2cm Peripheral Cutting Balloon® M001PCB50201350Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Microsurgical Dilatation Device · Class 2
All models of 2cm Peripheral Cutting Balloon (12)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729813699), received between Feb 17, 2020 and Apr 16, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Rupture5
- Material Integrity Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 16, 2026Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED A BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION, EXHIBITING 100% STENOSIS, WAS LOCATED IN A MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND MODERATELY CALCIFIED PERIPHERAL ARTERY, INVOLVING IN-STENT RESTENOSIS WITHIN PREVIOUSLY PLACED STENTS IN THE P1 AND P2 SEGMENTS OF THE POPLITEAL ARTERY, WITH ADDITIONAL DISTAL DISEASE. THE AFFECTED SEGMENT WAS PRE-DILATED USING A 5.0 X 120 MM STERLING BALLOON INFLATED TO NOMINAL PRESSURE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STENT IN THE P2 SEGMENT WAS UNDERSIZED, RESULTING IN A FLOW-LIMITING NARROWING. A 5.0 MM X 20 MM X 135 CM OTW PERIPHERAL CUTTING BALLOON WAS ADVANCED OVER A V18 GUIDEWIRE TO TREAT THE LESION. DURING INFLATION AT 10 ATMOSPHERES FOR APPROXIMATELY 10 SECONDS WITHIN THE P2 SEGMENT, BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED WITHOUT COMPLICATION. A SECOND 6.0 MM X 20 MM OTW PERIPHERAL CUTTING BALLOON WAS SUBSEQUENTLY ADVANCED TO THE SAME SEGMENT AND INFLATED TO 10 ATMOSPHERES; BALLOON RUPTURE AGAIN OCCURRED DURING INFLATION. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED WITHOUT RESISTANCE. FOLLOWING THESE EVENTS, A 5.0 X 40 MM X 135 CM CHARGER BALLOON WAS ADVANCED AND INFLATED TO 20 ATMOSPHERES. THEREAFTER, A 5.0 X 150 MM X 150 CM RANGER DEVICE WAS USED TO TREAT THE DIS
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24896881 ↗MalfunctionMar 25, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON HAD A HOLE. THE 80% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MILDLY TORTUOUS AND MILDLY CALCIFIED ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA. A 5.00 MM/2.0 CM/135 CM PERIPHERAL CUTTING BALLOON CATHETER WAS PREPARED AND ADVANCED INTO THE PATIENT FOR ANGIOPLASTY. HOWEVER, UPON INFLATION, THE BALLOON DID NOT HOLD PRESSURE. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND EXAMINED ON THE BACK TABLE, WHERE A HOLE WAS FOUND IN THE BALLOON. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING AN ALTERNATE DEVICE. NO COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21689999 ↗MalfunctionSep 14, 2023Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. A 5.00MM/2.0CM/135CM PERIPHERAL CUTTING BALLOON WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON RUPTURED AT 7 ATMOSPHERES UPON SECOND INFLATION. THE DEVICE WAS COMPLETELY REMOVED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING AN ALTERNATE METHOD. THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17749034 ↗MalfunctionJan 7, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A BALLOON PUNCTURE OCCURRED. A 5.00MM/2.0CM/135 PERIPHERAL CUTTING BALLOON WAS SELECTED FOR USE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BALLOON WAS PUNCTURED PRIOR TO OPENING THE DEVICE. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13196546 ↗MalfunctionAug 18, 2020Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. A 5.00MM/2.0CM/135CM PERIPHERAL CUTTING BALLOON WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BALLOON RUPTURED AT A NOMINAL PRESSURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10420165 ↗MalfunctionFeb 17, 2020Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON BURST. A 5.00MM/2.0CM/135CM PERIPHERAL CUTTING BALLOON WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BALLOON BURST WHEN INFLATED AT 4ATM INSIDE PATIENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9716440 ↗
Other Catheter, percutaneous, cutting/scoring devices
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2092-6040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring41 reports
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2076-5040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring31 reports
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2092-5040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring28 reports
- 2cm Peripheral Cutting Balloon® M001PCB8020900Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous, cutting/scoring18 reports
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2076-6040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring17 reports
- AngioSculpt OTW PTA Scoring Balloon Catheter 2105-6040The Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Percutaneous, Cutting/Scoring17 reports
- ULTRASCORE US14150530Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cutting/scoring15 reports
- ULTRASCORE US14150615Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cutting/scoring14 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page