Skip to content

Ultraflex™ Tracheobronchial M00576620Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Distal Release Stent System · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Ultraflex Tracheobronchial (25)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729842422), received between Jan 8, 2021 and Feb 8, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Positioning Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Positioning Problem2
  • Activation Failure1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 8, 2023Positioning Problem; Activation Failure; Positioning Problem; Activation Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ON (B)(6) 2023, THAT AN ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL COVERED DISTAL RELEASE STENT WAS TO BE IMPLANTED TO TREAT A MALIGNANT AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION DURING A BRONCHIAL SELF-EXPANDING METAL STENT (SEMS) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL WAS DEPLOYED; HOWEVER, THE STENT WAS UNABLE TO COMPLETELY EXPAND, AND IT MOVED OUT OF THE TARGET ANATOMY LOCATION AFTER DEPLOYMENT. THE ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL STENT WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT CONDITION FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16330031 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2021Positioning Problem; Positioning Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ON (B)(6) 2020 THAT AN ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL COVERED DISTAL RELEASE STENT WAS TO BE IMPLANTED TO TREAT A 3 CM MALIGNANT STRICTURE IN THE TRACHEA DURING A TRACHEAL STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY WAS NOT TORTUOUS AND WAS NOT DILATED PRIOR TO STENT PLACEMENT. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE STENT WAS FULLY DEPLOYED; HOWEVER, IMMEDIATELY AFTER DEPLOYMENT, THE STENT MOVED INTO AN INCORRECT POSITION. THE STENT WAS REMOVED WITH FORCEPS AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 11138965 ↗

Other Prosthesis, tracheal, expandable devices

All Prosthesis, tracheal, expandable devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page