Skip to content

EndoVive Safety PEG Kit M00509010Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Kit ENFit · Class 2

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
16
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 16 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729880400), received between Nov 3, 2020 and Feb 5, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 15 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Obstruction of Flow” (11 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 7 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 2 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 3 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520267
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Feb 20, 2024Open, Classified

    Inability to advance the guidewire through the feeding tube during placement due to blocked lumen of the barb connector. May lead prolongation in the procedure to exchange the device for another leading to leading to a cascade of events which may include additional intervention to close the puncture site, bleeding, leakage of gastric contents, and aspiration

    Z-1513-2024 · Root cause: Process design · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Obstruction of Flow11
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component3
  • Break1
  • Defective Device1
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions15
  • No Code Available1
  • Perforation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 16 most recent of 16 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 5, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PUSH PEG KIT BROKE AT THE CONNECTION AS THEY WERE PULLING IT THROUGH THE SKIN. THEY WERE ABLE TO GET A HOLD OF THE PLASTIC PIECE AND GRADUALLY WORKED IT THROUGH THE INCISION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INCISION WAS ENLARGED. THE PLASTIC PIECE HOWEVER BROKE AGAIN IN TWO DIFFERENT PLACES. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21318331 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 8, 2024Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THREE ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT USED IN THE SAME PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED DURING PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) TUBE PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GUIDEWIRE WAS NOT ABLE TO ADVANCE THRU THE PEG TUBE DUE TO AN OCCLUSION. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT TWO ADDITIONAL PEG KITS WERE OPENED AND ATTEMPTED TO BE USED BUT THE SAME PROBLEM OCCURRED. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19690832 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 8, 2024Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THREE ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT USED IN THE SAME PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED DURING PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) TUBE PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GUIDEWIRE WAS NOT ABLE TO ADVANCE THRU THE PEG TUBE DUE TO AN OCCLUSION. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT TWO ADDITIONAL PEG KITS WERE OPENED AND ATTEMPTED TO BE USED BUT THE SAME PROBLEM OCCURRED. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19690786 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 5, 2024Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THREE ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT USED IN THE SAME PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED DURING PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) TUBE PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GUIDEWIRE WAS NOT ABLE TO ADVANCE THRU THE PEG TUBE DUE TO AN OCCLUSION. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT TWO ADDITIONAL PEG KITS WERE OPENED AND ATTEMPTED TO BE USED BUT THE SAME PROBLEM OCCURRED. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19684475 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 20, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED DURING PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) TUBE PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING INSERTION, THE TUBE BROKE APART AT THE MIDDLE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19354875 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 2, 2024Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED DURING PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) TUBE PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO PASS THE WIRE THROUGH THE INTRODUCER. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF THE INTRODUCER WAS CLOGGED. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19230451 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 28, 2024Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THE THIRD OF THREE ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KITS PUSH METHOD THAT WERE USED IN THE SAME PATIENT AND PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED DURING AN ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY (EGD) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GUIDEWIRE COULD NOT PASS THROUGH THE TRANSITION ZONE BETWEEN THE CONNECTOR, BETWEEN THE HARD AND SOFT PLASTIC. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT TWO ADDITIONAL PEG KITS WERE OPENED AND ATTEMPTED TO BE USED BUT THE SAME PROBLEM OCCURRED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A FOURTH ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18800174 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 28, 2024Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THE SECOND OF THREE ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KITS PUSH METHOD THAT WERE USED IN THE SAME PATIENT AND PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED DURING AN ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY (EGD) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GUIDEWIRE COULD NOT PASS THROUGH THE TRANSITION ZONE BETWEEN THE CONNECTOR, BETWEEN THE HARD AND SOFT PLASTIC. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT TWO ADDITIONAL PEG KITS WERE OPENED AND ATTEMPTED TO BE USED BUT THE SAME PROBLEM OCCURRED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A FOURTH ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18800154 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 28, 2024Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THE FIRST OF THREE ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KITS PUSH METHOD THAT WERE USED IN THE SAME PATIENT AND PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED DURING AN ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY (EGD) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GUIDEWIRE COULD NOT PASS THROUGH THE TRANSITION ZONE BETWEEN THE CONNECTOR, BETWEEN THE HARD AND SOFT PLASTIC. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT TWO ADDITIONAL PEG KITS WERE OPENED AND ATTEMPTED TO BE USED BUT THE SAME PROBLEM OCCURRED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A FOURTH ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18799508 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 15, 2024Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THE SECOND OF TWO ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KITS PUSH METHOD THAT WERE USED IN THE SAME PATIENT AND PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GUIDEWIRE COULD NOT PASS THROUGH THE TRANSITION ZONE BETWEEN THE CONNECTOR, BETWEEN THE HARD AND SOFT PLASTIC. ANOTHER PEG KIT WAS USED; HOWEVER, THE SAME PROBLEM OCCURRED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18716080 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 15, 2024Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THE FIRST OF TWO ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KITS PUSH METHOD THAT WERE USED IN THE SAME PATIENT AND PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GUIDEWIRE COULD NOT PASS THROUGH THE TRANSITION ZONE BETWEEN THE CONNECTOR, BETWEEN THE HARD AND SOFT PLASTIC. ANOTHER PEG KIT WAS USED; HOWEVER, THE SAME PROBLEM OCCURRED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18716071 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 15, 2024Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THE SECOND OF TWO ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KITS PUSH METHOD THAT WERE USED IN THE SAME PATIENT AND PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING AN ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY (EGD) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GUIDEWIRE COULD NOT PASS THROUGH THE TRANSITION ZONE BETWEEN THE CONNECTOR, BETWEEN THE HARD AND SOFT PLASTIC. ANOTHER PEG KIT WAS USED; HOWEVER, THE SAME PROBLEM OCCURRED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18715536 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 15, 2024Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THE FIRST OF TWO ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KITS PUSH METHOD THAT WERE USED IN THE SAME PATIENT AND PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING AN ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY (EGD) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GUIDEWIRE COULD NOT PASS THROUGH THE TRANSITION ZONE BETWEEN THE CONNECTOR, BETWEEN THE HARD AND SOFT PLASTIC. ANOTHER PEG KIT WAS USED; HOWEVER, THE SAME PROBLEM OCCURRED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18715209 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 21, 2023Break; Defective Device; Break; Defective Device

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6), 2023. NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED DESPITE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS. THIS EVENT HAS BEEN DEEMED A REPORTABLE EVENT BASED ON THE INVESTIGATION FINDING OF A LOOP WIRE DISTAL END SECTION OF THE FEEDING TUBE WAS DETACHED. PLEASE SEE BLOCK H10 FOR FULL INVESTIGATION DETAILS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17787638 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 26, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING AN ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY WITH PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PEG TUBE DETACHED AT THE TRANSITION ZONE BETWEEN THE HARD AND SOFT PLASTIC. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13360276 ↗
  • InjuryNov 3, 2020Use of Device Problem; Difficult to Advance; Use of Device Problem; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PULL METHOD USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2020. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PEG TUBE WAS DIFFICULT TO PULL THROUGH THE STOMA. THE PHYSICIAN INTRODUCED THE TROCAR HOWEVER AN INITIAL INCISION WAS NOT DONE FIRST. REPORTEDLY, PROBLEMS BEGAN WHEN INCISIONS WERE MADE ALONGSIDE THE TUBING WHILE TRYING TO PULL THE TUBE THROUGH THE SITE. THIS CREATED SEVERAL MICRO PERFORATIONS. THE PATIENT WENT TO SURGERY. PER PHYSICIAN ASSESSMENT, THE PEG TUBE CONTRIBUTE TO THE MICRO PERFORATIONS. THE IFU (INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE) ENDOVIVE SAFETY PEG KIT PULL METHOD FOURTH STEP STATES THE FOLLOWING: USING THE EXPOSED BLADE OF THE SAFETY SCALPEL PROVIDED, MAKE A 1 TO 1.5 CM INCISION AT THE SELECTED INCISION SITE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Perforation

    MAUDE report 10777112 ↗

Other Gastrointestinal Tubes with Enteral Specific Connectors devices

All Gastrointestinal Tubes with Enteral Specific Connectors devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.