Hornet™ 14 H749393071900Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Guidewire · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729887751), received between Dec 12, 2018 and Sep 24, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Failure to Advance1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- Perforation1
- Pericardial Effusion1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 24, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT TIP DETACHMENT OCCURRED. DURING AN ATTEMPT TO ADVANCE A 190CM STRAIGHT TIP, HORNET 14 GUIDEWIRE THROUGH A CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION IN THE CORONARY ARTERY, THE DISTAL TIP OF THE WIRE FRACTURED AND REMAINED WITHIN THE VESSEL. THE FRAGMENT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY EMBEDDED BY THE DEPLOYED STENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 23137462 ↗InjuryNov 28, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE GUIDEWIRE TIP DETACHED AND WAS UNRETRIEVED, REQUIRING ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (CTO) OF THE CIRCUMFLEX ARTERY. THE 100% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND MODERATELY CALCIFIED CIRCUMFLEX ARTERY. A 190CM STRAIGHT TIP POUCH HORNET 14 GUIDEWIRE WAS SELECTED FOR USE. HOWEVER, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE WIRE TIP BECAME STUCK IN THE CALCIFIED LESION AND WITH FURTHER MANIPULATION, THE TIP OF THE WIRE BROKE OFF AND REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. THE REST OF THE WIRE WAS REMOVED SUCCESSFULLY. THE DECISION WAS MADE TO NOT RETRIEVE THE DETACHED GUIDEWIRE TO PREVENT FURTHER INJURY. THE INTENDED STENT WAS PLACED AND ADDITIONALLY STABILIZED THE WIRE TIP FRAGMENT TO THE VESSEL WALL WITH STENT PLACEMENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AND THE PATIENT WAS FULLY RECOVERED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 18221906 ↗InjuryJan 29, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT VESSEL PERFORATION OCCURRED WHICH LED TO PERICARDIAL EFFUSION REQUIRING ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. THE 100% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MODERATELY CALCIFIED LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY. A 190CM STRAIGHT TIP HORNET 14 GUIDEWIRE WAS ATTEMPTED TO CROSS THE LESION. THE 190CM STRAIGHT TIP HORNET 14 GUIDEWIRE THEN PERFORATED THE VESSEL. PERICARDIAL EFFUSION WAS OBSERVED AND WAS TREATED WITH PERICARDIOCENTESIS. THE PROCEDURE WAS ABORTED DUE TO THE PERFORATION AND IT IS PLANNED TO RESCHEDULE THE TREATMENT FOR A LATER DATE. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: Perforation; Pericardial Effusion
MAUDE report 11255362 ↗InjuryDec 12, 2018Fracture; Failure to Advance; Fracture; Failure to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT TIP DETACHMENT OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE CALCIFIED LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY. A 190CM STRAIGHT TIP HORNET 14 GUIDEWIRE WAS ADVANCED BUT FAILED TO CROSS THE LESION AND THE TIP GOT FRACTURED. NO FRAGMENT WAS LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY. A SPRING COIL BROUGHT THE REMAINING PORTION OF THE WIRE BACK TOGETHER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NON BSC DEVICE. NO PATIENT SERIOUS INJURY OR ADVERSE EVENT WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS GOOD.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8156534 ↗
Other WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices
- HI-TORQUE BALANCE MIDDLEWEIGHT UNIVERSAL II 1009664Abbott Vascular Inc. · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER321 reports
- SYNCHRO 14 M00313010Stryker Corporation · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER2 recalls220 reports
- PressureWire™ C12059Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER1 death296 reports
- SYNCHRO 2 M00326410Stryker Corporation · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER2 recalls155 reports
- ENROUTE .014" Guidewire 11686-01Silk Road Medical, Inc. · Wire, Guide, Catheter2 deaths228 reports
- ARROW IPN035915Teleflex Incorporated · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER217 reports
- OmniWire Pressure guide wire 89185Philips Image Guided Therapy Corporation · Wire, Guide, Catheter1 recall1 death160 reports
- ARROW IPN055780Teleflex Incorporated · Wire, guide, catheter4 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page