WallFlex™ Duodenal M00555880Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Stent System with Anchor Lock Delivery System · Class 2 · Implant
All models of WallFlex Duodenal (6)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08714729902515), received between Jul 27, 2022 and Jul 27, 2022 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Activation Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 27, 2022Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ON (B)(6) 2022 THAT A WALLFLEX DUODENAL SOFT UNCOVERED STENT WAS IMPLANTED TO TREAT A 10CM DUODENAL STRICTURE DURING A DUODENAL STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY WAS VERY TIGHT IN THE SECOND AND THIRD PORTION OF THE DUODENUM. ON (B)(6) 2022, THE WALLFLEX DUODENAL STENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED INSIDE THE PATIENT. HOWEVER, POST PROCEDURE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT DECOMPRESSED AND DID NOT RESPOND TO STENT PLACEMENT. ON (B)(6) 2022, IMAGING WAS TAKEN AND THE WALLFLEX DUODENAL STENT WAS FOUND TO BE IN GOOD POSITION; HOWEVER, THE MID PORTION OF THE WALLFLEX DUODENAL STENT WAS NOT FULLY EXPANDED. THE PHYSICIAN REASSESSED THE PATIENT STATUS FOR A SECOND STENT PLACEMENT AND A NASAL GASTRIC TUBE WAS PLACED. REPORTEDLY, 4 TO 5 DAYS AFTER THE INITIAL PLACEMENT, A 22 X 12 WALLFLEX DUODENAL STENT WAS IMPLANTED TO HELP EXPAND THE FIRST WALLFLEX DUODENAL STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AND THE PATIENT WAS SENT TO HOSPICE FOR PALLIATIVE CARE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15116879 ↗
Other Stent, metallic, expandable, duodenal devices
- Evolution G48026Cook Ireland Ltd · STENT,METALLIC,EXPANDABLE,DUODENAL1 death57 reports
- WallFlex™ Duodenal M00565020Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT,METALLIC,EXPANDABLE,DUODENAL42 reports
- WallFlex™ Duodenal M00565030Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT,METALLIC,EXPANDABLE,DUODENAL2 deaths38 reports
- WallFlex™ Duodenal M00565010Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT,METALLIC,EXPANDABLE,DUODENAL1 death30 reports
- Evolution G48027Cook Ireland Ltd · STENT,METALLIC,EXPANDABLE,DUODENAL30 reports
- Evolution G48025Cook Ireland Ltd · STENT,METALLIC,EXPANDABLE,DUODENAL14 reports
- WallFlex™ Duodenal M00555860Boston Scientific Corporation · Stent, metallic, expandable, duodenal2 reports
- WallFlex™ Duodenal M00555870Boston Scientific Corporation · Stent, metallic, expandable, duodenal1 death2 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page