Skip to content

EMBOLD™ Fibered M001394240050080Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Detachable Coil System · Class 2 · Implant

All models of EMBOLD Fibered (23)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08714729983583), received between Jun 10, 2025 and Jun 10, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Difficult or Delayed Separation1
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Malposition of Device1
  • Stretched1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 10, 2025Break; Stretched; Malposition of Device; Difficult to Advance; Difficult or Delayed Separation; Break; Stretched; Malposition of Device; Difficult to Advance; Difficult or Delayed Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DEPLOYMENT ISSUES OCCURRED, THE COIL WAS SNARED, AND THE COIL BROKE. A 5MM X 8CM EMBOLD FIBERED COIL WAS SELECTED FOR USE IN A RIGHT RENAL MASS EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE. SEVERAL 4MM X 8CM COILS AND ONE 5MM X 8CM COIL WERE PLACED. WHILE ATTEMPTING TO PLACE THE LAST COIL (THIS 5MM X 8CM EMBOLD FIBERED COIL), IT WAS DIFFICULT TO GET THE LAST BIT OF THE COIL INTO THE VESSEL. ONCE THEY DID, UPON DEPLOYING THE COIL, THE COIL WANTED TO COME BACK INTO THE MICROCATHETER AND FAILED TO DETACH. WHILE ATTEMPTING TO SLOWLY RECAPTURE THE COIL IN ORDER TO REMOVE IT, THE COIL DEPLOYED BUT WAS NO LONGER WHERE IT NEEDED TO BE; THE COIL WAS IN THE MAIN RENAL ARTERY. TO AVOID EMBOLIZING THE ENTIRE RIGHT KIDNEY, THE COIL WAS SNARED BUT BROKE INTO TWO PIECES WHEN PULLING IT OUT. BOTH PIECES WERE RETRIEVED. THE CATHETER, SNARE, AND COIL WERE REMOVED ALL TOGETHER. IMAGING WAS ABLE TO CONFIRM THAT THE COIL WAS FULLY REMOVED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22175791 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page