EMBOLD™ Fibered M001394240100200Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Detachable Coil System · Class 2 · Implant
All models of EMBOLD Fibered (23)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729983637), received between Mar 5, 2025 and Jul 7, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Advance” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Advance2
- Material Protrusion/Extrusion2
- Stretched2
- Difficult or Delayed Separation1
- Premature Activation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 7, 2026Premature Activation; Difficult to Advance
REPORTABLE BASED ON DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON 08JUN2026. IT WAS REPORTED THAT PREMATURE DEPLOYMENT OCCURRED. A 10X20 EMBOLD FIBERED WAS SELECTED FOR AN EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE. THE COIL WAS DIFFICULT TO ADVANCE AND DEPLOYED IN THE CATHETER BEFORE 25 PERCENT OF THE COIL WAS DEPLOYED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. AN ALTERNATE DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. HOWEVER, DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED COIL SEPARATION FROM THE DISTAL COUPLER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25738424 ↗MalfunctionFeb 26, 2026Stretched; Material Protrusion/Extrusion; Difficult or Delayed Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS PROTRUDING FROM THE TARGET LOCATION. THIS 10X20 EMBOLD? FIBERED DEVICE WAS SELECTED FOR USE DURING A SPLENIC ARTERY EMBOLIZATION. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE COIL DID NOT DETACH FROM THE DELIVERY WIRE WHEN THE PROXIMAL RELEASE MECHANISM WAS ACTIVATED. THE COIL WAS AT THE TARGET LOCATION WITH A PIECE OF THE COIL THAT DID NOT FULLY DETACH. WHEN THE SYSTEM WAS BEING PULLED BACK, THE COIL PULLED BACK WITH IT. WITH TIME AND MANEUVERING THEY WERE ABLE TO DETACH THE COIL ENOUGH WHERE ONLY A SHORT PIECE WAS LEFT DANGLING. IT WAS ADDITIONALLY NOTED THAT THE COIL BECAME STRETCHED AS A RESULT OF THIS. A ROAD RUNNER GUIDEWIRE AND ENVOY GUIDEWIRE WERE USED TO BREAK THE FILAMENT/TETHER STRING FROM THE DISTAL END OF THE COIL. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24462584 ↗MalfunctionMar 5, 2025Stretched; Difficult to Advance; Material Protrusion/Extrusion; Stretched; Difficult to Advance; Material Protrusion/Extrusion
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL STRETCHED AND WAS PROTRUDING FROM THE TARGET LOCATION. TWO 10X20 EMBOLD FIBERED DEVICES WERE SELECTED FOR USE FOR AN EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, UPON ADVANCING ONE OF THE COILS FORWARD THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER, THE COILS NORMAL RESISTANCE WHEN PUSHING FORWARD DISAPPEARED. IT APPEARED VIA IMAGING THAT THE COIL STRETCHED, AND THE COUPLER COULD BE SEEN AS WELL AS A LONG AREA OF STRETCHED COIL EXTENDING INTO AN AREA THEY DID NOT INTEND TO COIL. BOTH COILS REMAIN IMPLANTED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21527508 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page