Skip to content

HI-TORQUE IRON MAN 1001309Recalls & reported problems

Abbott Vascular Inc. · HI-TORQUE IRON MAN Guide Wire .014 Straight Tip 3.0 cm x 190 cm · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648013645), received between Sep 18, 2018 and Mar 4, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Separation3
  • Difficult to Advance2
  • Difficult to Remove2
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • Off-Label Use1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 4, 2025Material Separation; Difficult to Advance; Material Separation; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A MODERATE TORTUOUS AND HEAVILY CALCIFIED LESION IN THE MID RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY. THE IRONMAN GUIDEWIRE WAS ADVANCED HOWEVER MET RESISTANCE WITH THE GUIDING CATHETER AND THE TIP BROKE OFF. THE GUIDING CATHETER AND GUIDE WIRE WERE SIMPLY REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING NEW DEVICES. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21513598 ↗
  • InjuryOct 1, 2019Difficult to Remove; Material Separation; Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Remove; Material Separation; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A RIGHT INFERIOR PULMONARY VEIN WITH NOTED OBSTRUCTION. BALLOON DILATATION WAS PERFORMED. AN IRON MAN GUIDE WIRE (GW) WAS INSERTED INTO A 6FR LONG SHEATH THAT WAS CONNECTED WITH A VALVE Y-CONNECTOR, IN ORDER TO CROSS THE LESION. HOWEVER, THE GW INTERFERED WITH THE DISTAL END OF THE LONG SHEATH, THE COILED PART OF GW THEN BECAME SEPARATED. THE SEPARATED PORTION OF THE GW REMAINED INSIDE THE LONG SHEATH, AND WAS RETRIEVED BY USING A SNARE CATHETER. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW IRON MAN GW TO CONTINUE TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. 10/8/2019: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED CONFIRMS THAT THE GUIDE WIRE FELT RESISTANCE WITH THE SHEATH DURING REMOVAL AND THEN BECAME SEPARATED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9142445 ↗
  • InjurySep 18, 2018Off-Label Use; Difficult to Remove; Material Separation; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Off-Label Use; Difficult to Remove; Material Separation; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT A CORONARY SINUS. A 014 IRONMAN GUIDE WIRE WAS ADVANCED TO THE CORONARY SINUS. THE LEAD OF THE PACEMAKER WAS ADVANCED OVER THE GUIDE WIRE AND THE PACE MAKER WAS PLACED IN THE CORONARY SINUS. DURING REMOVAL OF THE GUIDE WIRE, THE GUIDE WIRE BECAME STUCK WITH THE LEAD OF THE PACEMAKER. EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS APPLIED WHEN THE TIP OF THE GUIDE WIRE BROKE OFF [DETACHED]. THE REMAINDER OF THE GUIDE WIRE WAS SIMPLY REMOVED, BUT THE BROKEN TIP REMAINED EMBEDDED IN THE CORONARY SINUS, ENDING THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELA AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In

    MAUDE report 7885659 ↗

Other WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices

All WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page