Skip to content

HI-TORQUE BALANCE MIDDLEWEIGHT 1001782Recalls & reported problems

Abbott Vascular Inc. · HI-TORQUE BALANCE MIDDLEWEIGHT Guide Wire .014 Straight Tip 3.0 cm x 300 cm · Class 2

All models of HI-TORQUE BALANCE MIDDLEWEIGHT (13)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648013843), received between Jan 8, 2019 and Jun 30, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Separation5
  • Difficult to Advance3
  • Difficult to Remove2
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method2
  • Device Damaged by Another Device1
  • Entrapment of Device1
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Stretched1

Patient problems

  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 30, 2025Material Separation; Failure to Advance; Difficult to Advance; Material Separation; Failure to Advance; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A HIGHLY CALCIFIED LESION IN THE RIGHT PERONEAL ARTERY. THE BMW GUIDE WIRE WAS ADVANCED HOWEVER FAILED TO CROSS THE LESION. THE GUIDE WIRE WAS REMOVED AND SET ASIDE. LATER IN THE PROCEDURE THE GUIDE WIRE WAS ADVANCED AGAIN WITH A CATHETER HOWEVER THE PHYSICIAN FELT AN ODD RESPONSE FROM THE GUIDE WIRE AND NOTICED THE GUIDE WIRE HAD SEPARATED INSIDE THE CATHETER. THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED WITH BOTH PIECES OF THE GUIDE WIRE INSIDE. ANOTHER BMW GUIDE WIRE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22358049 ↗
  • InjuryAug 29, 2022Entrapment of Device; Material Separation; Stretched; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Device Damaged by Another Device; Entrapment of Device; Material Separation; Stretched; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Device Damaged by Another Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A BIFURCATION LESION IN THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) ARTERY WITH MODERATE TO HEAVY CALCIFICATION AND >70% STENOSIS. AFTER IMPLANTATION OF THE STENT, THE HI-TORQUE (HT) BALANCE MIDDLE WEIGHT (BMW) GUIDE WIRE BECAME JAILED AND WHEN PULLED IT WAS PULLED BACK, THE GUIDE WIRE BECAME TRAPPED. IT WAS NOTED TO BE UNCOILED [UNRAVELED] AND THE TIP SEPARATED INSIDE THE ANATOMY. THE PROCEDURE WAS DONE UNDER FLUOROSCOPY BUT NO CINE IMAGES WERE TAKEN. ATTEMPTED TO SNARE THE SEPARATED TIP BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL AND WAS LEFT IN THE BODY. NO FINAL IMAGES WERE TAKEN OF THE MATERIAL LEFT IN THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 15311022 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 17, 2021Difficult to Remove; Material Separation; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Difficult to Remove; Material Separation; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    SUBSEQUENT TO THE INITIAL MEDWATCH REPORT, THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED:FORCE WAS APPLIED DURING DEVICE REMOVAL. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11341105 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 24, 2019Material Separation; Difficult to Advance; Material Separation; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT A HEAVILY CALCIFIED AND CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION LESION IN THE RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. A 014 BMW GUIDE WIRE WAS BEING ADVANCED INTO A MICRO-CATHETER; HOWEVER, RESISTANCE BETWEEN THE DEVICES WAS FELT AND THE GUIDE WIRE SEPARATED. THE SEPARATED GUIDE WIRE REMAINED IN THE MICRO-CATHETER AND WERE REMOVED AS A UNIT. A NEW UNSPECIFIED GUIDE WIRE AND A NEW MICRO CATHETER WERE USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9111956 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2019Difficult to Remove; Material Separation; Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Remove; Material Separation; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALANCE MIDDLE WEIGHT (BMW) GUIDE WIRE AS ADVANCED TO THE HEAVILY CALCIFIED DISTAL RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). THERE WAS RESISTANCE ADVANCING RAPID EXCHANGE BALLOON DILATATION CATHETERS (BDC) OVER THIS WIRE, SO THE PLAN WAS TO SWITCH THIS BMW OUT FOR A MORE SUPPORTIVE WIRE. AN OTW BDC WAS LOADED OVER THIS BMW AS A PLACEHOLDER FOR THE OTHER WIRE. DURING ATTEMPTS TO REMOVE THE BMW, RESISTANCE WAS MET AND THE DISTAL TIP OF THE BMW SEPARATED IN THE RCA. DEVICE INTERACTION WITH THE BDC ALONG WITH THE HEAVY CALCIUM WAS SUSPECTED TO HAVE CAUSED THE TIP SEPARATION OF THE BMW GUIDE WIRE. ATTEMPTS TO REMOVE THE BMW TIP WITH A SNARE WERE MADE, BUT WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. THE TIP WAS LODGED IN THE CALCIUM OVER AN AREA THAT WAS INTENDED TO BE TREATED WITH A STENT. A 3.0X12 MM XIENCE SIERRA STENT WAS IMPLANTED IN THE RCA COVERING THE SEPARATED TIP OF THE BMW. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELA. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In

    MAUDE report 8228321 ↗

Other WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices

All WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page