Skip to content

HI-TORQUE FLOPPY 22359MRecalls & reported problems

Abbott Vascular Inc. · HI-TORQUE FLOPPY II Guide Wire .014 Straight Tip 2.0 cm x 300 cm · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648080319), received between Jul 25, 2018 and Dec 5, 2018 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Remove2
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • Material Separation1
  • Off-Label Use1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 5, 2018Off-Label Use; Difficult to Remove; Off-Label Use; Difficult to Remove

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT A LESION IN THE LEG. A HI-TORQUE FLOPPY II GUIDE WIRE WAS ADVANCED FOR AN ATHERECTOMY PROCEDURE. ON REMOVAL OF THE NON-ABBOTT ATHERECTOMY CATHETER RESISTANCE WAS MET WITH THE GUIDE WIRE. THE GUIDE WIRE AND ATHERECTOMY CATHETER WERE REMOVED TOGETHER AS A SINGLE UNIT. AN ADDITIONAL NON-ABBOTT GUIDE WIRE AND AN UNSPECIFIED BALLOON CATHETER WERE USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO REPORTED CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8134502 ↗
  • InjuryJul 25, 2018Difficult to Remove; Material Separation; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Remove; Material Separation; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A LESION IN THE HEAVILY TORTUOSITY, MODERATELY CALCIFIED RAMOUS CORONARY ARTERY. RESISTANCE WAS FELT WITH THE ANATOMY DURING ADVANCEMENT OF THE FLOPPY II EXCHANGE GUIDE WIRE. DURING REMOVAL, RESISTANCE WAS FELT AGAIN WITH THE ANATOMY. FORCE WAS USED DURING REMOVAL AND THE GUIDE WIRE TIP SEPARATED IN THE ANATOMY. A STENT WAS IMPLANTED EMBEDDING THE GUIDE WIRE TIP AGAINST THE VESSEL WALL. THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY DURING THE PROCEDURE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 7719874 ↗

Other WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices

All WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page