PROGRESS 1011838Recalls & reported problems
Abbott Vascular Inc. · HI-TORQUE PROGRESS 80 Guide Wire .014 Straight Tip 3.0cm x 190 cm · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648144103), received between Jun 14, 2018 and Dec 21, 2020 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment Of Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Detachment Of Device Component1
- Failure to Advance1
Patient problems
- Intimal Dissection1
- Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 21, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) ARTERY. DURING USE OF A 014 HT PROGRESS GUIDE WIRE A DISSECTION OCCURRED; HOWEVER, DUE TO THE MINOR EXTENT, NO TREATMENT WAS NECESSARY. THE DEVICE WAS ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Intimal Dissection
MAUDE report 11048191 ↗InjuryJun 14, 2018Detachment Of Device Component; Failure to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION OF THE DISTAL RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY. A 190 CM HT PROGRESS 80 GUIDE WIRE WAS USED; HOWEVER, THE DEVICE FAILED TO CROSS THE LESION DUE TO THE ANATOMY. ADDITIONALLY, THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS NOTED TO BE SEPARATED AND WAS STUCK IN THE PATIENT ANATOMY AND WAS NOT FREE-FLOATING. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELA REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED FROM THE HOSPITAL AND IS STABLE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In
MAUDE report 7603830 ↗
Other WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices
- HI-TORQUE BALANCE MIDDLEWEIGHT UNIVERSAL II 1009664Abbott Vascular Inc. · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER321 reports
- SYNCHRO 14 M00313010Stryker Corporation · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER2 recalls220 reports
- PressureWire™ C12059Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER1 death296 reports
- SYNCHRO 2 M00326410Stryker Corporation · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER2 recalls155 reports
- ENROUTE .014" Guidewire 11686-01Silk Road Medical, Inc. · Wire, Guide, Catheter2 deaths228 reports
- ARROW IPN035915Teleflex Incorporated · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER217 reports
- OmniWire Pressure guide wire 89185Philips Image Guided Therapy Corporation · Wire, Guide, Catheter1 recall1 death160 reports
- ARROW IPN055780Teleflex Incorporated · Wire, guide, catheter4 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page