Skip to content

Supera™ S-75-060-120-P6Recalls & reported problems

Abbott Vascular Inc. · Supera™ Peripheral Stent System 7.5 mm x 60 mm x 120 cm 6 F · Class 3 · Implant

All models of SUPERA (55)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648294488), received between Nov 13, 2024 and Feb 13, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Activation Failure1
  • Difficult or Delayed Positioning1
  • Stretched1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 13, 2025Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Stretched; Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Stretched

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A LEFT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY WITH DISSECTION FROM A PREVIOUS PROCEDURE. A 7.5X60MM SUPERA SELF-EXPANDING STENT WAS NOTED TO BE DIFFICULT TO VISUALIZE DURING DEPLOYMENT RESULTING IN SEVERE ELONGATION OF THE STENT EXTENDING INTO THE ILIAC ARTERY. THE DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS REMOVED UNDER FLUOROSCOPY. NO FURTHER TREATMENT WAS PROVIDED. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21376147 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 13, 2024Activation Failure; Activation Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) WITH MILD CALCIFICATION, NO TORTUOSITY AND 95% STENOSIS. THE VESSEL DIAMETER IS 7.5 MM CONFIRMED WITH INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND (IVUS) AND THE VESSEL WAS PREPARED WITH A 7 MM BALLOON AT 12 ATMOSPHERES FOR 30 SECONDS. THE 7.5X60 MM SUPERA SELF EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM (SESS) WAS ADVANCED TO THE LESION VIA A CONTRALATERAL APPROACH AND DEPLOYMENT WAS STARTED. THE DEVICE RELEASED ABOUT 2 CM OF THE STENT BUT WOULD NOT DEPLOY ANY MORE. SLIGHT TORQUE WAS APPLIED TO THE SHAFT AND AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO SLIDE THE THUMBSLIDE BUT THE STENT STILL DID NOT DEPLOY. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED WITH THE STENT WITHOUT ISSUE AND A NEW SUPERA SESS WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20676074 ↗

Other STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY devices

All STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page