CARDINAL HEALTH SU130-0323 (UDI 10192253022247)Recalls & reported problems
Cardinal Health 200, LLC · DRAIN JACKSON PRATT 15FR · Class 1
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10192253022247), received between May 24, 2024 and May 15, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Separation6
- Break1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient5
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 15, 2026Material Separation
PATIENT HAD AN ELECTIVE LAMINECTOMY AND FUSION SURGERY. PATIENT RETURNED TO THE HOSPITAL POST PROCEDURE AFTER BEING DISCHARGED. CT IMAGING REVEALED A SURGICAL DRAIN FRAGMENT IN THE LAMINECTOMY BED REGION WITH ITS PROXIMAL END IN THE SUBCUTANEOUS SOFT TISSUES JUST BENEATH THE SKIN. PATIENT RETURNED TO SURGERY FOR REMOVAL OF RETAINED DRAIN FRAGMENT. A SURGICAL DRAIN/DRAIN FRAGMENT IS SUGGESTED IN THE REGION OF THE LAMINECTOMY BED WITH ITS PROXIMAL END IN THE SUBCUTANEOUS SOFT TISSUES JUST BENEATH THE SKIN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 25194342 ↗InjuryMar 24, 2026Material Separation
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE DRAIN BROKE OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT. INITIAL LUMBAR SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026 WITH A DRAIN PLACEMENT. ON (B)(6) 2026, SURGERY FOR EXPLORATION POST SURGICAL LUMBAR WOUND REPAIR FOR DURAL TEAR WAS PERFORMED. PROVIDER STATED HE REMOVED A PIECE OF RETAINED DRAIN YESTERDAY ON (B)(6) 2026. NO FURTHER DETAILS WERE PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24676906 ↗InjuryMar 20, 2026Material Separation
ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL SURGERY FOR L5-S1 TLIF. CUSTOMER REPORTED THE DRAIN BROKE OFF AND WAS RETAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT. ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT WAS BROUGHT BACK TO SURGERY FOR I&D OF LUMBAR WOUND. THE SURGEON DID NOT STATE THAT HE REMOVED ANY RETAINED DRAIN PIECES AND IT IS NOT DOCUMENTED IN THE SPECIMEN PORTION OF THE INTRAOPERATIVE RECORD. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE CUSTOMER.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24654783 ↗InjuryMar 20, 2026Material Separation
CUSTOMER REPORTED THE DRAIN BROKE OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT. ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL SURGERY FOR NERVE MONITORED L3-S1 HEMILAMINECTOMY, LEFT FUSION WITH NAVIGATION. ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT WAS BOUGHT BACK TO SURGERY FOR REMOVAL OF RETAINED DRAIN THAT BROKE IN THE SURGICAL LUMBAR REGION. SPECIMEN WAS SENT TO THE HOSPITAL LAB. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24654666 ↗InjuryMar 20, 2026Material Separation
CUSTOMER REPORTED THE DRAINS ARE BREAKING OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT. ON (B)(6) 2026, PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL SURGERY FOR NERVE MONITORED LEFT L4 HEMILAMINECTOMY WITH NAVIGATION AND FUSION L4-5. ON (B)(6) 2026, NURSING NOTES STATED THAT SOME RESISTANCE WAS MET ON DRAIN REMOVAL, HOWEVER, JP DRAIN TIP NOT INTACT. THE NURSE WAS UNABLE TO SEE THE TIP IN VIEW. ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT WAS BROUGHT BACK TO SURGERY FOR REMOVAL OF THE JP DRAIN TIP FROM THE BACK. SPECIMEN SENT TO THE HOSPITAL LAB. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24653286 ↗MalfunctionNov 19, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE DRAIN WAS BEING MILKED WHILE EMPTYING, AND THE DRAIN TUBING BROKE LEADING TO IT NEEDING TO BE REMOVED. DRAIN WAS NOT REPLACED. ONE NURSE EVEN NOTES THE TUBING LOOKED "OFF". WHEN QUESTIONED SHE SAID IT LOOKED WORN, ALMOST LIKE IT WAS OLD.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23597294 ↗MalfunctionMay 24, 2024Break; Break
CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE WOUND DRAIN WAS FOUND FRACTURED IN THE MIDDLE DURING A BREAST SURGERY AND WAS REPLACED DURING THAT INITIAL SURGERY. THE PRODUCT WAS CONNECTED WITH SU130-1305 100CC RESERVOIR TO PROCESS WOUND DRAIN. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19397762 ↗
Other CATHETER, IRRIGATION devices
- Navarre Opti-Drain NOD8LPTBard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION901 reports
- Navarre NNU8LPTBard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION736 reports
- BLAKE 2227Ethicon Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION331 reports
- Navarre NNU6LPTBard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION211 reports
- Navarre Opti-Drain NOD10LPTBard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION178 reports
- Navarre NNU10LPTBard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION127 reports
- BLAKE 2233Ethicon Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION114 reports
- Vasoshield VH-5001Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Catheter, Irrigation1 recall27 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page