Skip to content

MEDLINE AVT0270Recalls & reported problems

Medline Industries, Inc. · GLOVE,SURG,ADVANTAGE PI UNDRGLV,LF,PF,7 · Class 1

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10197344099702), received between Sep 10, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Fragmentation1
  • Material Separation1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 10, 2026Material Fragmentation; Material Separation; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    It was reported that, product tears when donning gloves, and the product was flaking off during use. The portion of shredded surgical glove fell into patient's mediastinum. The surgeon noticed at 1106 but unaware of when glove became contaminated and whose glove had a hole in it. The surgeon, medical student and first assist removed and replaced gloves. The wound class changed to contaminated from break in sterile technique. What was the original intended procedure? cabg (coronary artery bypass graft), coronary artery bypass grafting times, left internal mammary artery takedown, endoscopic left saphenous vein harvesting; transesophageal echocardiogram; cystoscopy, foley placement by urology service.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 50713481 ↗

Other Surgeon's gloves devices

All Surgeon's gloves devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page