Skip to content

Varnish Pen - Assorted 295782Recalls & reported problems

Young Dental Manufacturing I, LLC · 45 count · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10302732957827), received between May 14, 2018 and May 14, 2018 — classified as 1 injury.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Inflammation1
  • Local Reaction1
  • Rash1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 14, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT RETURNED FOR A FOLLOW UP APPOINTMENT AFTER HER HYGIENE APPOINTMENT A WEEK BEFORE. FOLLOWING THE APPOINTMENT, SHE BROKE OUT IN SORES ON THE INSIDE OF HER LIPS AND THINKS IT IS DUE TO THE VARNISH PEN. SHE HASN'T HAD VARNISH USED FOR OVER 2 YEARS AND HAS A KNOWN HISTORY OF LATEX/RUBBER ALLERGY. THE VARNISH PEN WAS USED ON HER, WHICH WAS THE ONLY NEW THING USED. ALL OTHER PRODUCTS USED HAVE BEEN USED ON HER BEFORE. THE PATIENT IS FEMALE IN HER (B)(6) AND HAS BEEN TAKING BENADRYL TO TREAT THE SORES. THE SORES WERE STILL PRESENT DURING THE FOLLOW UP APPOINTMENT. THE VARNISH PEN IS COMPRISED OF VARNISH, AN ALUMINUM TUBE, AND PLASTIC. THERE IS NO KNOWN PRESENCE OF LATEX IN THE MAKEUP OF THESE PARTS. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT SUGGESTS THE POSSIBLE REACTION WAS DUE TO THE VARNISH PEN. BENADRYL WAS USED TO REDUCE THE EFFECTS OF THE POSSIBLE ALLERGIC REACTION THAT OCCURED AFTER THE HYGIENE APPOINTMENT. IT HAS NOT BEEN CONCLUDED THAT IMPAIRMENT OR PERMANENT DAMAGE COULD HAVE OCCURRED IF MEDICATION HAD NOT BEEN USED. HOWEVER, SINCE AN ADDITIONAL PRECAUTION WAS USED, WE BELIEVE THE EVENT IS REPORTABLE. THIS EVENT DID NOT RESULT IN SERIOUS INJURY TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Local Reaction; Rash

    MAUDE report 7512257 ↗

Other Varnish, Cavity devices

All Varnish, Cavity devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page