Integra® Jarit® 277274TIRecalls & reported problems
Integra Lifesciences Production Corporation · Integra® Jarit® Rhoton-Type Ball Dissector, 7-1/2", No. 16, Angled 90°, 3mm, Titanium · Class 1
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10381780208525), received between Oct 16, 2025 and Oct 16, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 16, 2025Break; Break
A FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE RHOTON-TYPE BALL DISS 71/2 90D TT (277274TI) INSTRUMENT BROKE AT A 90-DEGREE ANGLE AT THE TIP AND WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT. ACCORDING TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE STERILE PROCESSING SUPERVISOR, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE NEUROSURGERY RESIDENT AND THE OPERATING ROOM TEAM WHO WORKED ON THE CASE STATED THAT THE BROKEN PART WAS NOT RECOVERED, AND THE FLUOROSCOPY X-RAY THAT WAS PERFORMED DID NOT DETECT ANY BROKEN PIECES. IT WAS ALSO CONVEYED THAT THE PATIENT WAS UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA DURING THE PROCEDURE, AND THE OPERATING ROOM TEAM TRIED TO RETRIEVE THE BROKEN PIECE AFTER "COMMITTING A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME TRYING TO TAKE THE BROKEN PIECE OUT, " BUT IT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. ACCORDING TO THE NEUROSURGERY RESIDENT, THE PIECE MIGHT HAVE BEEN SUCTIONED OUT WHEN HE WAS DISSECTING TO REMOVE IT, AND THE PATIENT WAS NOTIFIED OF THE INCIDENT." A DIFFERENT INSTRUMENT THAT WAS AVAILABLE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. POSTOPERATIVELY, THE PATIENT HAD THE SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025, WAS DISCHARGED ON (B)(6) 2025, AND HAD A RE-ADMISSION DUE TO A COMPLAINT OF NECK PAIN ON (B)(6) 2025 AND DISCHARGED ON (B)(6) 2025.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 23318716 ↗
Other INSTRUMENT, MICROSURGICAL devices
- Synergetics 20.04.25SSynergetics USA, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, MICROSURGICAL5 reports
- Integra® Ruggles®-Redmond™ RN6202Integra Lifesciences Production Corporation · INSTRUMENT, MICROSURGICAL2 reports
- V. Mueller NL3785-009Steris Corporation · INSTRUMENT, MICROSURGICAL1 report
- Avalign VM82-7222Avalign Technologies, Inc. · INSTRUMENT, MICROSURGICAL1 report
- Symmetry Surgical 57-2610Aspen Surgical Products, Inc. · Instrument, Microsurgical1 report
- Integra® Ruggles®-Redmond™ RN6206Integra Lifesciences Production Corporation · INSTRUMENT, MICROSURGICAL1 report
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.