Skip to content

PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-16-054Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PINNACLE GRIPTION ACETABULAR SHELL REVISION 54mm OD 48 LINER · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PINNACLE GRIPTION (57)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295009313), received between May 12, 2021 and Oct 18, 2021 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Insert” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Insert1
  • Migration1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 18, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Migration; Osseointegration Problem; Migration

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS MIGRATION AND LOOSENING OF THE CUP AT THE BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE. CANCER PATIENT. CONVERTED TO TRI-FLANGE. PROXIMAL FEMUR AND SEGMENT REMOVED TO RE-ESTABLISH LEG LENGTH. DOI: (B)(6) 2018, DOR: (B)(6) 2021 AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 12646632 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 12, 2021Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PDM LINER WOULD NOT STAY SEATED WITH MULTIPLE TRIAL REDUCTIONS, THERE MAY HAVE BEEN TISSUE IN THE VIP TAPER. THE DECISION WAS MADE TO PUT IN ANOTHER PINNACLE POLY LINER. THE BROKEN STEM WAS THE REASON FOR THE SECOND REVISION. THE ONLY IMPLANT THAT WAS NOT EXPLANTED WAS THE 54 MM PINNACLE REVISION CUP.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11813323 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page