Skip to content

PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-16-058Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PINNACLE GRIPTION ACETABULAR SHELL REVISION 58mm OD 52 LINER · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PINNACLE GRIPTION (57)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295009337), received between Nov 9, 2017 and Mar 23, 2021 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 23, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    MEDICAL RECORDS RECEIVED AD 10 MAR 2021. AFTER REVIEW OF MEDICAL RECORDS, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS COMPLAINING OF PAIN AND WAS REVISED DUE TO FAILED LEFT THA WITH MEDICAL PROTRUSION OF THE ACETABULUM INTO THE PELVIS. OPERATIVE NOTES REPORTED THAT THE ACETABULUM HAD MEDIALIZED INTO THE PELVIS AND THE BALL WAS SITTING DEEP IN THE PELVIS. INSPECTION OF THE ACETABULUM, THERE WAS NOTED TO BE ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR COLUMNS INTACT, HOWEVER THERE WAS A SIGNIFICANT MEDIAL WALL, ANTERIOR WALL AND POSTERIOR WALL DEFECT. THERE WAS A SIGNIFICANT MEDIAL BONE GRAFT THAT HAD NOT INCORPORATED AND WAS LOOSE IN THE CAVITY. DOI: (B)(6) 2018, DOR: (B)(6) 2019, LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Pain

    MAUDE report 11558768 ↗
  • InjuryNov 9, 2017Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS LOOSENING OF THE CUP AT THE BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE. IT ALSO STATES THE PATIENT FELL AND DISLODGED HER CUP.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 7014643 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page