PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-16-062Recalls & reported problems
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PINNACLE GRIPTION ACETABULAR SHELL REVISION 62mm OD 56 LINER · Class 2 · Implant
All models of PINNACLE GRIPTION (57)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295009351), received between Nov 14, 2018 and Aug 20, 2024 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Osseointegration Problem4
- Migration2
- Loss of Osseointegration1
- Loss of or Failure to Bond1
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration5
- Discomfort1
- Inflammation1
- No Code Available1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 20, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE PATIENT'S PINNACLE REVISION CUP AND CONSTRAINED LINER PARTIALLY PULLED OUT OF THE ACETABULUM. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE CONSTRAINED LINER, ACETABULAR CUP AND FIVE SCREWS. A NEW REVISION CUP AND DUAL MOBILITY LINER WERE PLACED.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 20003390 ↗InjuryOct 31, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT HAD REVISION OF HARDWARE DUE TO LOOSE CUP. DOI: (B)(6) 2021. DOR: (B)(6) 2022. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 15699565 ↗InjuryApr 21, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Migration; Osseointegration Problem; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED AS ACETABULAR SHELL IMPLANT LOOSENING/MOVEMENT. IT WAS INDICATED THAT THERE WAS LOOSENING OF THE CUP AT THE BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE. DOI: (B)(6) 2020, DOR: (B)(6) 2021, AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 11704521 ↗InjuryNov 14, 2019Loss of Osseointegration; Migration; Loss of Osseointegration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENTS ACETABULAR COMPONENT FAILED AND COLLAPSED INTO THE PATIENTS PELVIS. DR (B)(6) WAS UNSURE OF ORIGINAL IMPLANT DATE, BUT THE FIRST REVISION DATE WAS (B)(6) 2019. DR LES PERFORMED THAT REVISION AS WELL. THE PINNACLE REVISION CUP WAS LOOSENED AT BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE AND WAS TAKEN OUT, ALONG WITH THE SCREWS, LINER, AND 40MM +15.5 FEMORAL HEAD. DR (B)(6) PREPARED THE ACETABULUM FOR A 74MM REVISION PINNACLE CUP AND PLACED SEVERAL SCREWS IN TO SECURE THE CUP. A 40MM +5 FEMORAL HEAD WAS TRIALED AND FOUND TO BE SATISFACTORY. THE REAL HEAD WAS IMPLANTED AND THE CLOSING PROCESS BEGAN. DOI: (B)(6) 2019; DOR: (B)(6) 2019; RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; No Code Available
MAUDE report 9324267 ↗InjuryNov 14, 2018Loss of or Failure to Bond; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of or Failure to Bond; Osseointegration Problem
PATIENT ALLEGES PAIN, DISCOMFORT, INFLAMMATION, POPPING AND SNAPPING AND ELEVATED METAL ION LEVELS, PSEUDOTUMOR, LOOSENING OF CUP, METAL WEAR METALLOSIS, AND ELEVATED METAL IONS. DOI: (B)(6) 2009 - DOR: (B)(6) 2014 (RIGHT HIP).
Patient problems: Discomfort; Inadequate Osseointegration; Inflammation; Pain
MAUDE report 8070420 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page