Skip to content

PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-17-058Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PINNACLE GRIPTION ACETABULAR SHELL REVISION (DPX) 58mm OD 52 LINER · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PINNACLE GRIPTION (57)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295009474), received between Sep 20, 2017 and Oct 1, 2018 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loss of Osseointegration3
  • Disassembly1
  • Failure to Osseointegrate1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration3
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Fall1
  • No Code Available1
  • Not Applicable1
  • Pain1
  • Tissue Damage1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 1, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUP CAME LOOSE AT THE BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE AND BOTH PERIPHERAL SCREWS BROKE.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7923246 ↗
  • InjurySep 4, 2018Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    REASON FOR ORIGINAL COMPLAINT.- PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS A PAINFUL LEG. A LITTLE BIT OF CORROSION WAS NOTICED INSIDE THE FEMORAL HEAD. DOI: (B)(6) 1998; (STEM & SLEEVE); (B)(6) 2010; (HEAD & LINER); DOR: (B)(6) 2012; (LEFT HIP). UPDATE AD 25 APRIL 2018: (B)(4) HAS BEEN RE-OPENED UNDER (B)(4) DUE TO THE RECEIPT OF PPF AND STICKER SHEETS. IN ADDITION TO WHAT WERE PREVIOUSLY ALLEGED, PPF ALLEGES PSEUDOTUMOR, LOOSENING OF CUP, INFECTION AND LOOSENING OF STEM. ADDED BONE SCREWS DUE TO ALLEGED LOOSENING OF CUP. ADDED LAWYER AND LAW FIRM. DOI: (B)(6) 2010; DOR: (B)(6) 2012; (LEFT HIP).

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Not Applicable; Pain; Tissue Damage; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7841940 ↗
  • InjuryJun 26, 2018Disassembly; Loss of Osseointegration; Disassembly; Loss of Osseointegration

    DER STATES THAT THE PATIENT DISLOCATED HIS HIP, PULLING CONSTRAINED LINER FROM ACETABULAR CUP AND SUBSEQUENTLY LOOSENING ACETABULAR CUP AT THE BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE. IT WAS ALSO INDICATED THAT THERE WAS POLY WEAR AND THE LINER WAS BROKEN. DOI: UNKNOWN; DOR: (B)(6) 2018; RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 7637533 ↗
  • InjurySep 20, 2017Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS BROKEN PELVIS ABOVE THE CUP AND CUP LOOSENING DUE TO FALL. LOOSENING OCCURRED FROM BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Fall

    MAUDE report 6879722 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page