Skip to content

PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-31-044Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PINNACLE 100 ACETABULAR SHELL GRIPTION 100 44mm OD · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PINNACLE GRIPTION (57)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295010166), received between Mar 17, 2022 and Jun 7, 2022 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Noise, Audible1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 7, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Noise, Audible; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Noise, Audible

    PATIENT ACCOUNT OF EXPERIENCE: I FELT AN IMBALANCE WITH PAIN IN THE LEG WHERE I WAS PLACED THE PROSTHESIS, AFTER THE PAIN A SQUEAK HAS INCREASED, I WENT TO CONSULT WITH THE TREATING DOCTOR AND HIS DIAGNOSIS IS THAT THE PROSTHESIS HAD A BREAK IN THE POLYETHYLENE PART, (THAT THE PIECE CAME OUT WRONG). HOSPITAL REPORT: HEREBY INFORM YOU THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGICAL TREATMENT; THE SURGERY WAS LEFT HIP TOTAL ARTHROPLASTY AND WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS. THE PROSTHESIS THAT WAS PLACED IN THIS PROCEDURE WAS JOHNSON'S PROSTHESIS, SUMMIT STEM PINACLE ACETABULUM, AND CORAIL.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Pain

    MAUDE report 14621234 ↗
  • InjuryMar 17, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A TOTAL HIP DONE AT (B)(6) ON (B)(6) 2022. SOMETIME BETWEEN THEN AND (B)(6) THE LINER DISASSOCIATED FROM THE CUP. THE SURGEON NOTICED IT ON X-RAY WHEN SHE WAS IN FOR HER 2 WEEKS FOLLOW UP AND SHE WAS IMMEDIATELY BOOKED FOR REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2022 THE SURGEON WOULD LIKE THE LINER ANALYSED AND THE MECHANISM OVER FAILURE LOOKED INTO. DOI: (B)(6) 2022, DOR: (B)(6) 2022, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP AFFECTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 13800697 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page