Skip to content

PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-058Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PINNACLE GRIPTION ACETABULAR SHELL SECTOR 58mm OD · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PINNACLE GRIPTION (57)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This DePuy Pinnacle Gription hip cup is an implant used in hip replacement surgery. Its 102 FDA reports include 97 injuries and no deaths, and often describe pain, infections, and poor bonding with the bone, with some reports of the cup shifting, the liner separating, or dislocation. Several reports describe revision surgery. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
103
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
98
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 103 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295010333), received between Jul 19, 2017 and Sep 14, 2026 — classified as 98 injuries, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (10 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 2 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 2 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 3 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 2 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem52
  • Osseointegration Problem10
  • Use of Device Problem10
  • Loss of Osseointegration9
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information8
  • Malposition of Device7
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated6
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection3

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection38
  • No Code Available30
  • Pain25
  • Inadequate Osseointegration19
  • Insufficient Information11
  • Joint Laxity6
  • Limited Mobility Of The Implanted Joint5
  • Tissue Damage5

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 103 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 14, 2026Use of Device Problem

    It was reported that the patient was dislocating do to poor cup placement incl/Ante per the doctor. Doctor removed the cup and revised to a new cup with DM.DOI: (b)(6) 2026.DOR: (b)(6) 2026.Affected side: Right Hip.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 50752075 ↗
  • InjuryApr 3, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT WAS REVISED FOR PAIN. AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 24778939 ↗
  • InjuryMar 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT HIP REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6) 2023. HIP BECAME PAINFUL. CUP WAS REVISED TO A LARGER SIZE 60 FROM A 58. SURGERY WENT WITHOUT INCIDENT. DOI: (B)(6) 2023. DOR: (B)(6) 2026. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 24716327 ↗
  • InjuryDec 18, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION DUE TO INSTABILITY/DISLOCATION. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS KNOWN. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2025. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23838170 ↗
  • InjuryDec 1, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR COULD NOT GET LINER TO SIT IN THE CUP CORRECTLY. ACTIVITY LEVEL - YES. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23682169 ↗
  • InjuryOct 23, 2025Migration; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD AN ACETABULAR CUP IMPLANTED THAT HAS SHIFTED HORIZONTALLY AND NEEDED TO BE REVISED. SURGEON REPLACED CUP/LINER/HEAD TO LARGER SIZES. AFFECTED SIDE- LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23366463 ↗
  • InjuryAug 1, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS INFECTED, ALL IMPLANTS WERE EXTRACTED AND ANTIBIOTIC BEADS WERE IMPLANTED. DOI: (B)(6) 2022. DOR: (B)(6) 2025. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 22686944 ↗
  • InjuryMay 9, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION DUE TO DISASSOCIATION OF THE LINER AND CUP. DEPUY CUP, HOLE, ELIMINATOR, HEAD, AND LINER REVISED. COMPETITOR PRODUCTS PLACED WITHIN THE ACETABULUM WITH A NEW DEPUY FEMORAL HEAD AND EXISTING FEMORAL STEM. DOI: (B)(6) 2023 (CUP AND STEM), DOI: (B)(6) 2023 (HEAD AND LINER), DOR: (B)(6) 2024, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP. THIS IS A LINK PC OF (B)(4).

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21997883 ↗
  • InjuryMay 9, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023 PATIENT WAS ADMITTED FOR TREATMENT OF A PULMONARY EMBOLISM 17 DAYS AFTER A REVISION HIP SURGERY (TO TREAT IMPLANT LINER-CUP DISASSOCIATION). DOE: NOV 20, 2023. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP. THIS IS A LINK (B)(4).

    Patient problems: Pulmonary Embolism

    MAUDE report 21996256 ↗
  • InjuryMay 2, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024, THE THA WAS INFECTED. I&D OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2024 BUT FAILED. THE FEMUR WAS LOOSE. DURING THE HIP EXPLANT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025, THE WATSON FEMORAL SLAP HAMMER WAS BENT TRYING TO REMOVE THE STEM. THIS REPORT CAPTURES THE INFECTION. RELATED COMPLAINT (B)(4) CAPTURED THE I&D FAILURE. RELATED COMPLAINT (B)(4) CAPTURES THE REVISION PROCEDURE. DOI: (B)(6) 2024. DOR: (B)(6) 2025. AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 21949823 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 3, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SURGEON REVISED CUP FOR INSTABILITY FOLLOWING LUMBAR/PELVIS FUSION. THERE WAS NO IMPLANT FAILURE AND NO BROKEN PIECES. THERE WAS NO LOOSENING AND NO CASE DELAY. THERE WAS NO SURGEON CONCERNS. NO OTHER INFORMATION KNOWN. DOI: (B)(6) 2024; DOR: (B)(6) 2025; AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 21297431 ↗
  • InjuryNov 26, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2024, DUE TO INFECTED HIP. ONE STAGE WASHOUT/REVISION PERFORMED. SURGICAL DELAY UNKNOWN. DATE OF IMPLANT (B)(6) 2024. DOI: (B)(6) 2024. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20779229 ↗
  • InjuryOct 3, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION ONE STAGE. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN HIP SIDE.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20361845 ↗
  • InjurySep 20, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON REMOVED THE IMPLANTS DUE TO INFECTION. SURGICAL DELAY WAS UNKNOWN. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN HIP.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20272082 ↗
  • InjuryAug 23, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED, THAT THE PATIENT HAD DISLOCATED, DUE TO CUP IMPLANTED VERTICALLY. S/N CUP WAS IMPLANTED WITH OUR HEAD. NO SURGICAL DELAY. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. DOI: UNKNOWN; DOR: (B)(6) 2024; AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 20057459 ↗
  • InjuryJul 15, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THIS IS THE SECOND REVISION OF THIS ACETABULUM, THE FIRST PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED WITH (B)(4). THE POLYETHYLENE LINER BECAME DISSOCIATED FROM THE PINNACLE SECTOR CUP IN THAT INSTANCE, AND THE SAME HAS HAPPENED HERE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19742691 ↗
  • InjuryJun 26, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT DEVELOPED A HEMATOMA IN HIP. DOCTOR REMOVED CUP, LINER AND HEAD AND CHANGE POSITION OF CUP. DOI: (B)(6) 2019. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN HIP SIDE.

    Patient problems: Hematoma

    MAUDE report 19616803 ↗
  • InjuryJun 6, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION. THERE WAS A LOOSENING REPORTED AT STEM. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE : RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 19477823 ↗
  • InjuryApr 10, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD MULTIPLE DISLOCATIONS POST TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT. SHE WAS SCHEDULED FOR CONVERSION FROM A STANDARD BEARING TO A DUAL MOBILITY BEARING TO INCREASE STABILITY. PATIENT MENTIONS TO SURGEON DURING PREOP THAT SHE IS EXPERIENCING SOME GROIN PAIN ALSO. INTRAOPERATIVELY THE HIP IS FOUND TO BE RELATIVELY STABLE. HOWEVER WHEN THE CUP IS CHECKED, THERE APPEARS TO BE SOME MOVEMENT AND IS REMOVED SHOWING FIBROUS INGROWTH ONLY. THE ACETABULUM IS PREPARED AND A NEW CUP IS PLACED ALONG WITH A SCREW FOR ADJUNCT FIXATION. A DUAL MOBILITY BEARING IS PLACED AND A SLIGHTLY LONGER CONSTRUCT IS CHOSEN AS IT CREATED A MORE STABILE CONSTRUCT FOR THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO DELAY OR HARM TO THE PATIENT. DOI: (B)(6) 2022; DOR: (B)(6) 2024; AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Joint Laxity; Pain

    MAUDE report 19080174 ↗
  • InjuryMar 26, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024 THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PSOAS IMPINGEMENT. SO THE CUP WAS EXPLANTED AND NEW ONE WAS IMPLANTED. DOI: UNKNOWN; DOR: (B)(6) 2024; AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 18979451 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 27, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED: A. WAS THERE ANY SURGICAL DELAY RELATED TO THE EVENT? NO. B. WHAT IS THE LOOSENING INTERFACE? BONE PROTHESIS. C. WAS THERE ANY INFECTION? EPIDERMIS GERME & PNEUMONIE. D. CLARIFY WHAT IMPLANT(S) WERE REVISED? ALL CUP & STEM. D. PLEASE CONFIRM IF THERE WAS AN INFECTION. THE EVENT DESCRIPTION IS UNCLEAR. SKIN GERMS ONLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 18789777 ↗
  • InjuryJan 23, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT WAS REVISED AND INSERTION OF ANTIBIOTIC SPACER FOR SUSPECTED INFECTION. NO WAY TO CONFIRM INFECTION. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY. DOI: (B)(6) 2022 DOR: (B)(6) 2024 AFFECTED SIDE : RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 18562824 ↗
  • InjuryNov 27, 2023Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO DISLOCATION AND COULD NOT BE STABILIZED DURING CLOSED REDUCTION. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY. DOI: (B)(6) 2023. DOR: (B)(6) 2023. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP. ADDITIONAL EVENT INFORMATION: THE CUP HAD MORE ANTEVERSION THAN USUAL. THE DEPUY IMPLANTS HAD NOT MIGRATED. CUP WAS SOLID. DUAL MOBILITY IMPLANT WAS EXCHANGED AND PATIENT WAS STABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18212135 ↗
  • InjuryNov 8, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION. DOR: (B)(6) 2023, (B)(6) 2023. DOI: (B)(6) 2023. RIGHT HIP. DID THE PATIENT EXPERIENCE AN ADVERSE EVENT SUCH AS INFECTION, NON-UNION, ALLERGIC REACTION, OSTEOPOROSIS, OVERLOADING, PAIN, DEGENERATIVE DISEASES, BLEEDING OR OOZING? UNKNOWN. DID THE PATIENT REQUIRE REVISION SURGERY OR HARDWARE REMOVAL? UNKNOWN. PATIENT STATUS/ OUTCOME / CONSEQUENCES. WAS OTHER MEDICAL INTERVENTION (E.G. X-RAYS, ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES, PRESCRIPTIONS, OTC, REVISION) REQUIRED: UNKNOWN. IS THE PATIENT PART OF A CLINICAL STUDY UNKNOWN. (B)(4). DEVICE PROPERTY OF NONE. DEVICE IN POSSESSION OF NONE. (B)(4). DEVICE PROPERTY OF NONE. DEVICE IN POSSESSION OF NONE. (B)(4). DEVICE PROPERTY OF NONE. DEVICE IN POSSESSION OF NONE. (B)(4). DEVICE PROPERTY OF NONE. DEVICE IN POSSESSION OF NONE. BY CHECKING THIS BOX I CERTIFY THAT ALL INFORMATION THAT ARE KNOWN/AVAILABLE HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ANY NEW INFORMATION WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE, THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE SUBMITTED THROUGH CST. TRUE.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 18092994 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 30, 2023Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A 58 N LINER WAS OPENED FOR A 58 CUP. SURGEON POSITIONED IT WITH A TONSIL AND IMPACTED. CHECKED FOR STABILITY AGAIN WITH TONSIL. LINER DID NOT SEAT. REPOSITIONED AND IMPACTED, THE LINER WOULD NOT SEAT. IMPLANT BOXES WERE CHECKED AND AFTER DETERMINING THE RIGHT IMPLANT WAS OPENED, AN IDENTICAL LINER WAS PLACED ON THE FIELD AND IMPACTED. EVERYTHING WENT ACCORDINGLY AND SURGERY CARRIED ON. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH 5MIN OF SURGICAL DELAY. DOI: (B)(6) 2023. AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN HIP.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18028287 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page