S-ROM MARATHON 1220-70-128Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295015840), received between Feb 23, 2018 and Apr 6, 2026 — classified as 12 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryApr 6, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Naturally Worn

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT HAD A RIGHT TOTAL HIP DONE WITH A SROM STEM AND SROM CUP PLACED AROUND THIRTY YEARS AGO. PATIENT DEVELOPED POLY WEAR, SO PATIENT HAD A HEAD AND LINER EXCHANGE DONE ON (B)(6) 2019. WAS DOING GREAT UNTIL RECENTLY; THE PATIENT FELL AND DISLOCATED. THE SURGEON WANTED TO REMOVE THE CUP. DID A COMPLETE ACETABULAR REVISION UTILIZING DUAL MOBILITY KEEPING THE SROM HEAD IN PLACE. DOI: (B)(6) 2019. DOR: (B)(6) 2026. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

  Patient problems: Fall; Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 24790755 ↗
• InjuryJul 29, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD OLD SROM CUP WITH SROM STEM. THERE WAS POLY WEAR AND THE PATIENT NEEDED HEAD AND LINER EXCHANGE. ALL PIECES WERE RETRIEVED. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 22642105 ↗
• InjuryDec 1, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2022. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: Pain

  MAUDE report 15894045 ↗
• InjuryNov 2, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  REVISION COMPLETED DUE TO PAIN. DOI: UNKNOWN, DOR: OCT 19, 2022, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: Pain

  MAUDE report 15716633 ↗
• InjuryApr 1, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. DOI: UNKNOWN; DOR: (B)(6) 2022; AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.

  Patient problems: Pain

  MAUDE report 13977060 ↗
• InjuryJul 8, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS PATIENT HAD HER HIP REPLACED 20+ YEARS AGO, THE SURGEON AND HOSPITAL WHERE THE ORIGINAL PRIMARY HIP TOOK PLACE IS UNKNOWN. DR. (B)(6) REVISED THIS PATIENT'S HIP ON (B)(6) 2021 FOR A WORN OUT ACETABULAR LINER. THE PATIENT DID FINE UNTIL RECENTLY ACCORDING TO DR. (B)(6) BUT HAS DISLOCATED SEVERAL TIMES AFTER BENDING INTO A POSITION TRYING TO CATCH AN ITEM FALLING. WHAT THE ITEM AND POSITION ARE UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE HIP AND EXPLANTED THE LINER AND REPLACED IT WITH A CONSTRAINED LINER AND THE SUPERCUP WAS LEFT IN VITRO. THE STEM AND HIP BALL ARE NOT A DEPUY PRODUCT. THIS IS ALL OF THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO ME AT THIS TIME. DOI: (B)(6) , 2021 DOR: (B)(6) 2021 AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 12137973 ↗
• InjuryMar 5, 2020Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT¿S HIP BECAME SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE AFTER 25+ YEARS OF STABILITY. THE LINER HAS SOME SUPERIOR WEAR SO THE SURGEON ELECTED TO RETAIN THE STEM AND CUP COMPONENTS AND REPLACE THE HEAD/LINER TO RESTORE STABILITY. ORIGINAL IMPLANT DATE UNKNOWN. DOI: 25+ YEARS. DOR: (B)(6) 2020, RIGHT SIDE.

  Patient problems: No Code Available

  MAUDE report 9793029 ↗
• InjuryNov 26, 2019Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS POLY CHANGED DUE TO WEAR. DOI: (B)(6) 1994; DOR: (B)(6) 2019; LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: No Code Available

  MAUDE report 9378113 ↗
• InjurySep 19, 2019Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO WORN POLY. ORIGINAL IMPLANT DATE UNKNOWN. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2019, RIGHT HIP.

  Patient problems: No Code Available; Pain

  MAUDE report 9087794 ↗
• InjuryMar 7, 2019Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A RIGHT THA PERFORMED APPROXIMATELY 20 YEARS AGO. THE SURGEON FELT FROM X-RAY THAT THE PATIENT HAD DEVELOPED POLY WEAR. AFTER THE SURGEON SENT ME A PICTURE OF THE X-RAY, IT WAS DETERMINED TO BE AN SROM STEM AND SROM CUP. DURING THE SURGERY, THE SURGEON REMOVED THE SROM LINER AND 2 LOCKING PINS. THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT POLY WEAR, BUT THE SURGEON DIDN'T THINK IT WAS EXCESSIVE CONSIDERING IT HAS BEEN IN APPROXIMATELY 20 YEARS. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO IDENTIFY THE POLY AS A M SERIES. HE TRIALED A 10DEG TRIAL AND LIKED THE STABILITY AND LEG LENGTH. HE IMPLANTED THE NEW 28MM 10DEG M SERIES LINER AND USED 3-5.0 LINER LOCKING PINS. HE ALSO USED A CERAMIC SROM HEAD 28MM +0. HE WAS HAPPY WITH THE OUTCOME OF THE SURGERY. DOI: (B)(6) 1999; DOR: (B)(6) 2019, RIGHT HIP.

  Patient problems: No Code Available

  MAUDE report 8400297 ↗
• InjuryJun 19, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

  REVISION HIP: UNKNOWN PRIMARY DETAILS: THIS CASE IS LOGGED TO CAPTURE 1ST REVISION: WE HAD A SURGEON REPLACE A LINER 122070128 S-ROM MARATHON LINER M 28 10 DEGREE NON-CONSTRAINED INTO AN S-ROM 51MM OBLONG SHELL.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; Not Applicable

  MAUDE report 7613516 ↗
• InjuryFeb 23, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

  THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PAIN. IT WAS STATED THAT THE PATIENT HAD THR OVER 20 YEARS AGO. DOI: 20 YEARS AGO; DOR: (B)(6) 2018; LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: Pain

  MAUDE report 7291825 ↗