Skip to content

LCS 1278-05-000Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · LCS TIBIAL INSERT MENISCAL BEARING BRIDGING BEARING SM+/STD 10mm · Class 3 · Implant

All models of LCS (45)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295020134), received between Sep 9, 2019 and Aug 29, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn2

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 29, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A SURGERY VIA TKA. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY. AFTER THE SURGERY, IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE TIBIAL INSERT WAS SCHEDULED FOR REVISION DUE TO AGE-RELATED DETERIORATION. A SPECIFIC DATE FOR THE REVISION HAS NOT YET BEEN SET. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20096381 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 9, 2019Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    THE PRIMARY SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2004 VIA TKA. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE REVISION SURGERY WAS SCHEDULED TO BE PERFORMED BY REPLACING THE TIBIAL INSERT (P/N: 127805000) DUE TO WEAR OF THE TIBIAL INSERT CAUSED BY DETERIORATION OVER TIME (DATE OF REVISION SURGERY WAS UNKNOWN). NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8974830 ↗

Other Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing devices

All Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page