Skip to content

SIGMA LCS COMPLETE POROCOAT 1294-32-120Recalls & reported problems

Depuy (Ireland) · SIGMA LCS COMPLETE TIBIAL TRAY ROTATING PLATFORM M.B.T. CONE POROCOAT SIZE 2 CEMENTLESS · Class 3 · Implant

All models of SIGMA LCS COMPLETE POROCOAT (11)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295025672), received between Jan 6, 2020 and Nov 9, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Migration1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • Pain3
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • Limited Mobility Of The Implanted Joint1
  • No Code Available1
  • Unspecified Infection1
  • Unspecified Tissue Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 9, 2023Migration; Migration

    LITIGATION COMPLAINT RECEIVED 24 OCT 2023 WAS REVIEWED BY CLINICIAN. ON (B)(6) 2002, THE PATIENT HAD A LEFT NON-CEMENTED LCS TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, TO ADDRESS LEFT KNEE MEDIAL FEMORAL CONDYLE CHONDRAL DEFECT WITH THE PATELLOFEMORAL CHONDRAL DEFECT. DEPUY COMPONENTS WERE IMPLANTED DURING THIS PROCEDURE. ON (B)(6) 2023 THE PATIENT HAD A LEFT TOTAL KNEE REVISION TO ADDRESS ARTHROPLASTY MECHANICAL FAILURE. THE SURGICAL FINDINGS INCLUDED TIBIAL SUBSIDENCE WITHOUT LOOSENING, AND PATELLAR BUTTON POLY WEAR. THE TIBIA WAS NOTED TO HAVE SUBSIDED 10MM. COMPETITOR COMPONENTS WERE IMPLANTED DURING THIS PROCEDURE. DOI:(B)(6) 2002. DOR:(B)(6) 2023 (LEFT KNEE).

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Pain; Unspecified Tissue Injury

    MAUDE report 18101182 ↗
  • InjuryJun 28, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED FOR DEEP INFECTION AND SEVERE PAIN. EVENT IS SERIOUS AND IS CONSIDERED SEVERE. EVENT IS NOT RELATED TO EITHER DEVICE AND PROCEDURE. DATE OF IMPLANT: (B)(6) 2018. DATE OF REVISION: UNK. DATE OF EVENT: (B)(6) 2023. (LEFT KNEE). TREATMENT: REVISION; FEMORAL COMPONENT, TIBIAL BASE, AND PATELLA WERE REMOVED.

    Patient problems: Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 17216879 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 6, 2020Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    UPDATE 20 DEC 2019. MEDICAL RECORDS WERE REVIEWED TO IDENTIFY PATIENT HARMS/PRODUCT ISSUES. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE PATIENT PRESENTED FOR A LEFT KNEE EVALUATION DUE TO PAIN, DECREASED RANGE OF MOTION, INSTABILITY, AND DIFFICULTY WALKING FOLLOWING A FALL. THE PHYSICIAN SUSPECTED A POSSIBLE TIBIAL BONE FRACTURE AND POSSIBLE PATELLAR TENDON INJURY. AN X-RAY OF THE LEFT KNEE REVEALED A VALGUS ALIGNMENT OF ABOUT 3 DEGREES AS WELL AS A SMALL SCLEROTIC AREA ON THE TIBIA. THE PHYSICIAN INDICATED THE PATIENT WOULD UNDERGO AN MRI TO RULE OUT POSSIBLE INJURIES. THE PATIENT WAS PUT IN A KNEE IMMOBILIZER AND GIVEN CRUTCHES. THE PRIMARY OPERATIVE NOTE INDICATED TWO DEPUY CEMENT PRODUCTS WERE USED DURING THE PRIMARY OPERATION. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF REVISION OR INVASIVE INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Limited Mobility Of The Implanted Joint; No Code Available; Pain

    MAUDE report 9553908 ↗

Other Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing devices

All Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page