SIGMA LCS COMPLETE POROCOAT 1294-34-130Recalls & reported problems
Depuy (Ireland) · SIGMA LCS COMPLETE TIBIAL TRAY ROTATING PLATFORM M.B.T. KEEL POROCOAT SIZE 3 CEMENTLESS · Class 3 · Implant
All models of SIGMA LCS COMPLETE POROCOAT (11)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 11
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295025870), received between Aug 18, 2017 and Sep 26, 2024 — classified as 11 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
- Loss of Osseointegration3
- Osseointegration Problem2
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
Patient problems
- Pain6
- Inadequate Osseointegration4
- No Code Available3
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
- Joint Laxity1
- Muscular Rigidity1
- Swelling/ Edema1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 26, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT HAD A REVISION DONE FOR FLEXION INSTABILITY. UNFORTUNATELY NO IMPLANT RECORD WAS AVAILABLE. SOME OF THE IMPLANTS HAD LEGIBLE IMPLANT, BUT OTHERS WERE NOT. THE METAL BACKED PATELLA WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW POLY. UNKNOWN SURGICAL DELAY. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT KNEE.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 20312065 ↗InjuryApr 22, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
PATIENT WAS REVISED FOR AESEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE NON-CEMENTED TIBIAL COMPONENT. IT DID NOT COME OUT EASY. THERE WAS MOSTLY FIBROUS INGROWTH IN THE POROUS COATED SIGMA IMPLANTS. DOI: UNKNOWN; DOR: (B)(6) 2022; AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT KNEE.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 14186602 ↗InjuryDec 1, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
PRIMARY OPERATIVE NOTES (B)(6) 2009 INDICATE THE PATIENT RECEIVED A RIGHT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT DUE TO END STAGE OSTEOARTHRITIS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT INDICATION OF COMPLICATION BY THE SURGEON. OFFICE NOTES (B)(6) 2021 INDICATE THE PATIENT IS EXPERIENCING PAIN AND SWELLING OF THE RIGHT KNEE IN ADDITION TO THE PREVIOUSLY NOTED AE. NO ADDITIONAL TREATMENT PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Pain; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 12908030 ↗InjuryNov 9, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. DOI: UNKNOWN, DOR: (B)(6) 2021, RIGHT KNEE.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 12780007 ↗InjuryApr 7, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN AND LOOSENING OF THE TIBIAL TRAY AT THE IMPLANT TO BONE INTERFACE. PATIENT HAD A RIGHT KNEE REPLACEMENT WITH A DIFFERENT SURGEON IN 2019, WITH SIGMA CRUCIATE RETAINING POROUS COATED TIBIAL AND FEMORAL COMPONENTS. PATIENT REPORTED HAVING PAIN AS EARLY AS THREE MONTHS AFTER SURGERY, INCREASING TO THE POINT THAT PATIENT VISITED THE SURGEON FOR A SOLUTION. SURGEON SUGGESTED A REVISION TO CEMENTED COMPONENTS. THE FEMORAL COMPONENTS WAS WELL FIXED, THE TIBIAL COMPONENT LESS SO BUT DID NOT APPEAR GROSSLY LOOSE. THE RP CURVED INSERT SHOWED NO WEAR ON GROSS EXAMINATION. SURGEON RE-IMPLANTED A PRIMARY ATTUNE PS FEMORAL COMPONENT, WITH A STATEMENT REVISION TIBIAL TRAY AND A 14 MM PS FIXED BEARING INSERT. SURGEON WENT WELL, WITH A SATISFACTORY OUTCOME. DOI: (B)(6) 2019 DOR: (B)(6) 2021 RIGHT KNEE.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain
MAUDE report 11628833 ↗InjuryMay 29, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS INSTABILITY. NO SURGICAL DELAY. DOI: (B)(6) 2019. DOR: (B)(6) 2020; LEFT KNEE.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 10102698 ↗InjuryDec 4, 2019Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS LOOSENING OF THE TIBIAL COMPONENT AT THE BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE. CEMENT MANUFACTURER IS UNKNOWN. FAILURE OF INGROWTH IN THE TIBIAL COMPONENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. DOI: UNKNOWN; DOR: (B)(6) 2019 LEFT KNEE.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; No Code Available
MAUDE report 9412636 ↗InjuryNov 14, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. DOI: (B)(6) 2019; DOR: (B)(6) 2019; RIGHT KNEE.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Pain
MAUDE report 9324142 ↗InjuryAug 8, 2018Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS LOOSENING OF THE FEMORAL AND TIBIAL COMPONENT AT THE BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE. REVISED TO TC3 AND PATELLA WAS WELL FIXED AND REMAINED IMPLANTED. DOI: (B)(6) 2010; DOR: (B)(6) 2018; LEFT KNEE.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 7761706 ↗InjuryAug 28, 2017Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PAIN. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE CEMENTLESS TIBIAL TRAY APPEARED TO BE LOOSE AT UNKNOWN INTERFACE.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 6824707 ↗InjuryAug 18, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PAIN AND STIFFNESS.
Patient problems: Muscular Rigidity; Pain
MAUDE report 6805198 ↗
Other Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing devices
- ATTUNE 1506-10-005Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing442 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-10-004Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing442 reports
- ATTUNE 1518-20-038Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing3 deaths393 reports
- LCS SIGMA 1294-33-130Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing1 recall310 reports
- ATTUNE 1518-20-035Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing342 reports
- P.F.C. SIGMA 96-0102Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing1 death319 reports
- ATTUNE 1518-20-041Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing308 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-10-007Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing284 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page