Skip to content

SIGMA LCS COMPLETE POROCOAT 1294-34-140Recalls & reported problems

Depuy (Ireland) · SIGMA LCS COMPLETE TIBIAL TRAY ROTATING PLATFORM M.B.T. KEEL POROCOAT SIZE 4 CEMENTLESS · Class 3 · Implant

All models of SIGMA LCS COMPLETE POROCOAT (11)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295025887), received between Mar 1, 2018 and Oct 19, 2023 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
  • Loss of Osseointegration2
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration4
  • Pain4
  • No Code Available3
  • Unspecified Infection2
  • Abscess1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 19, 2023Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN AND LOOSENING OF THE FEMUR AND TIBIA AT BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE. CEMENT MANUFACTURER IS DEPUY. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2023. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain

    MAUDE report 17967535 ↗
  • InjuryApr 25, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    CLINICAL NOTIFICATION RECEIVED FOR REVISION DUE TO INFECTION. REMOVAL OF ALL COMPONENTS. DATE OF IMPLANT: (B)(6) 2016. DATE OF IMPLANT (INSERT): (B)(6) 2022, DATE OF REVISION: (B)(6) 2022, (RIGHT KNEE).

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 14193982 ↗
  • InjuryApr 12, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED FOR LATERAL ABSCESS. EVENT IS SERIOUS AND IS CONSIDERED MODERATE. EVENT IS NOT RELATED TO DEVICE AND POSSIBLY RELATED TO PROCEDURE. DATE OF IMPLANT: (B)(6) 2009, DATE OF IMPLANT INSERT: (B)(6) 2016, DATE OF EVENT: (B)(6) 2022, (RIGHT KNEE). TREATMENT: IRRIGATION AND DEBRIDEMENT.

    Patient problems: Abscess; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 14083842 ↗
  • InjurySep 27, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PAIN. DOI: UNKNOWN, DOR: (B)(6) 2021, RIGHT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 12533816 ↗
  • InjuryDec 13, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO FLEXION CONTRACTURE AND STABILITY ISSUES. ALL COMPONENTS WERE REMOVED AND ATTUNE REVISION COMPONENTS WERE IMPLANTED. THE LOT NUMBERS ON THESE EXPLANTED COMPONENTS WERE NOT LEGIBLE EXCEPT FOR THE POLYETHYLENE BEARING. POROCOATED IMPLANTS WERE USED. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2019. RIGHT KNEE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9467169 ↗
  • InjuryJan 31, 2019Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS TO PAIN AND LOOSENING OF THE TIBIAL COMPONENT AT THE BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; No Code Available; Pain

    MAUDE report 8292703 ↗
  • InjuryNov 13, 2018Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PAIN AND LOOSENING OF THE TIBIAL COMPONENT AT NON-CEMENTED INTERFACE.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; No Code Available; Pain

    MAUDE report 8064043 ↗
  • InjuryMar 1, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection; Loose or Intermittent Connection

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PAIN AND LOOSENING OF THE TIBIA AT THE BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE AND PATELLA AT THE UNKNOWN INTERFACE. DEPUY CEMENT WAS USED. DOI: (B)(6) 2005, DOR: (B)(6) 2018, RIGHT SIDE.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 7306083 ↗

Other Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing devices

All Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page