Skip to content

SIGMA 1960-50-200Recalls & reported problems

Depuy (Ireland) · SIGMA FEMORAL POSTERIOR STABILIZED CEMENTED SIZE 2 RIGHT · Class 3 · Implant

All models of SIGMA (380)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
12
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
10
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295075110), received between Sep 7, 2017 and Feb 3, 2026 — classified as 10 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Delivered as Unsterile Product” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem7
  • Delivered as Unsterile Product1
  • Device Damaged Prior to Use1
  • Fracture1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Loss of or Failure to Bond1
  • Malposition of Device1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • Joint Laxity4
  • Pain4
  • No Code Available2
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Information1
  • Not Applicable1

Recent adverse event reports

The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 3, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INSTABILITY OF PREVIOUS IMPLANTS. REMOVED OLD IMPLANTS AND REVISED WITH NEW. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 24245692 ↗
  • InjuryDec 9, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INSTABILITY. POSTERIOR LATER WEAR ON INSERT. UNKNOWN LOT NUMBERS. SURGEON REMOVED FEMUR, TIBIA, INSERT.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 23756280 ↗
  • InjuryDec 8, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IMPLANTS REMOVED DUE TO INSTABILITY AND ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN. SURGEON BELIEVES THE JOINT LINE WAS RAISED TOO MUCH RESULTING IN PATELLA BAJA. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Pain

    MAUDE report 15939128 ↗
  • InjuryApr 25, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION COMPLETED TO ADDRESS PAIN DUE TO OVERSTUFFED TIBIAL IMPLANT. ISSUE WAS WITH THE SIZING OF THE IMPLANT. NO LOOSENING WAS PRESENT.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 14196703 ↗
  • InjuryMar 1, 2022Loss of or Failure to Bond; Fracture; Use of Device Problem; Loss of or Failure to Bond; Fracture; Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, 2003, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT THE TKA SURGERY WITH THE P.F.C SIGUMA FEMORAL COMPONENT IN QUESTION. AFTER THE SURGERY, IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE MEDIAL CONDYLE OF FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS CRUSHED AND MISALIGNED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. THE REVISION SURGERY IS PLANED ON (B)(6) 2022. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. AS OF THIS REPORT, THERE HAS BEEN NO RECORD OF REVISION.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 13632882 ↗
  • InjuryApr 21, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS INSTABILITY. NO LOOSENING REPORTED. NO DELAY TO SURGERY. DOI: (B)(6) 2014, DOR: (B)(6) 2021, RIGHT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 11699626 ↗
  • InjuryAug 27, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO FLEXION INSTABILITY WITH HER PREVIOUS KNEE REPLACEMENT. SURGEON TIGHTENED HER FLEXION GAP WITH A TC3 FEMUR, +2 BOLT AND TC3 RP INSERT. DOI: (B)(6) 2015 DOR: (B)(6) 2020 RIGHT KNEE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 10461207 ↗
  • InjuryMar 4, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE REASON FOR REVISION WAS INSTABILITY. THE MEDIAL FEMORAL CONDYLE WAS FRACTURED AT ONE POINT. IT WAS HEALED AT TIME OF REVISION.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); No Code Available; Pain

    MAUDE report 9785517 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 2, 2019Delivered as Unsterile Product; Delivered as Unsterile Product

    ON SUNDAY THE 13TH IN THE SURGERY PROCESS THE J&J INHOUSE INSTRUMENTALIST DETECTED THAT THE PRODUCT SIGMA PS FEMUR SZ2 R (CODE 196050200 AND LOT: 8014599), HAD THE PLASTIC PROTECTOR OPEN. AFTER SURGICAL PROCEDURE HAS ADVANCED 10 MINUTES AND BEFORE PLACING THE DEFINITIVE PROSTHESIS ASKS THE CIRCULATOR TO PASS THE PROSTHESES AND THEY REALIZE THAT WHEN THEY OPENED THE BOX OF THE FEMORAL COMPONENT THEY WERE OPEN AND THEREFORE WERE NOT STERILE, THIS CAUSED DISCOMFORT WITH THE SURGEON. SO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE J&J EXECUTIVE TO URGENTLY MANAGE YOUR REPLACEMENT. THIS CLAIM WAS ACCEPTED BY THE DELIVER TEAM AS A DISTRIBUTION CLAIM. THIS DELAY IN REPLACING THE PRODUCT IN THE INSTITUTION CAUSED THE PATIENT TO BE EXPOSED AT AN ADDITIONAL TIME TO THE ANESTHESIA OF THE PLANNED.   DATE OF AWARENESS OF ADVERSE INCIDENT: NOVEMBER 5.

    Patient problems: Not Applicable

    MAUDE report 9398288 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 17, 2019Device Damaged Prior to Use; Device Damaged Prior to Use

    CUSTOMER SENT IMPLANT TO DOT TO HAVE IT COATED WITH TINI. AT INCOMING INSPECTION DOT IDENTIFIED SOME SCRATCHES ON THE IMPLANT AND REFUSED IT TO UNDERGO THE TINI COATING-PROCESS. NO SURGERY DELAY, NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES FOR PATIENT REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8799297 ↗
  • InjurySep 26, 2017Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    IT WAS INDICATED THAT FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS IMPLANTED IN EXCESSIVE VALGUS DUE TO A CORTICAL PERFORATION WITH THE IM T-HANDLE.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 6893492 ↗
  • InjurySep 7, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PAIN.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 6847815 ↗

Other Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing devices

All Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page