Skip to content

DELTA XTEND 2307-88-027Recalls & reported problems

Depuy (Ireland) · DELTA Xtend GLENOID RESURFACING REAMER DIA 27 MM · Class 1

All models of DELTA XTEND (194)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This DePuy Delta Xtend glenoid resurfacing reamer is a surgical instrument used to prepare the shoulder socket. Most of the 60 reports describe reamers that would not cut or had become dull or worn out, with a few mentioning blades or handles breaking or snapping during surgery or cleaning. Two injuries were reported and no deaths. There are no recalls for this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
60
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 60 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295116479), received between Jan 9, 2018 and Jan 2, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 58 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Cut” (33 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 2 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 2 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 4 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 2 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520264
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Cut33
  • Dull, Blunt20
  • Naturally Worn9
  • Break6
  • Contamination /Decontamination Problem1
  • Crack1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions35
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient20
  • Insufficient Information3
  • Bone Fracture(s)2
  • Not Applicable2

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 60 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 2, 2026Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THE END OF THE IMPACTOR HANDLE BROKE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23944343 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 24, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING WASHING A STAFF MEMBER FORCED THE WHITE SHEATH OF THE REAMER OFF AND WHEN TRAYING TO PUT IT BACK TOGETHER THE SHEATH SNAPPED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21230576 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 4, 2024Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    IT WAS REPORTED "DOCTOR STATES THAT THE HUB IN THE SET WOULD NOT SCREW ONTO THE CATHETER ONCE TUNNELLING WAS COMPLETED AND THEY WERE ATTACHING THE HUBS. COLLAR WAS USED." THE DEVICE WAS NOT REMOVED OR REPLACED THE CATHETER WAS LEFT IN SITU. ANOTHER HUBSET WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION NEEDED. THE PATIENT'S CURRENT CONDITION IS REPORTED AS "FINE".

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20370419 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 4, 2024Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED AND STATES THAT: AS IN MY ORIGINAL REPORT, THEY WERE REPORTED AS BEING BLUNT ON THE (B)(6) 2024 DURING AN OPERATION ON THAT DAY. BOTH REAMERS WERE CODE 2307-88-027 GLENOID RESURFACING REAMERS Ø 27 MM BAND THERE WERE 2 USED OFF 2 DIFFERENT SETS AND THEY WERE BOTH REPORTED AS BEING BLUNT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20370125 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 17, 2024Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT THE GLENOID REAMER WAS BLUNT - NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT AND MINIMAL DELAY TO THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19548286 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 13, 2024Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    THE GLENOID RESURFACING REAMER 27 MM BLADES ARE DULLED AND HAZARDOUS WHEN REAMING THE GLENOID.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19533189 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 13, 2024Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    THE GLENOID RESURFACING REAMER 27 MM BLADES ARE DULLED AND HAZARDOUS WHEN REAMING THE GLENOID.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19533184 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 13, 2024Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    THE GLENOID RESURFACING REAMER 27 MM BLADES ARE DULLED AND HAZARDOUS WHEN REAMING THE GLENOID.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19533181 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 18, 2024Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    THE GLENOID RESURFACING REAMERS WERE BLUNT ON BOTH OF THEIR CONSIGNED TRAYS. NO DELAY AND NO DETRIMENT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18926521 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 19, 2024Break; Break

    1. WAS THERE A SURGICAL DELAY? IF YES, WHAT IS THE DURATION OF THE DELAY? NO 2. WAS THERE ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES THAT AFFECTED THE PATIENT BECAUSE OF THE REPORTED EVENT? NO 3. CAN YOU PLEASE CONFIRM THE DATE OF EVENT WAS FEB 13, 2024? IT WAS WHEN IT WAS REPORTED TO ME 4. DID IT BREAK INTO TWO OR MORE PIECES? IF NO, PLEASE SPECIFY THE ALLEGED DEFICIENCY OF THE INSTRUMENTS. WERE THEY BENT, STRIPPED, CROSS THREADED, ETC.? TIP APPEARED BROKEN.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18731208 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 7, 2024Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    THE GLENOID RESURFACING REAMER WAS BLUNT ON THE CONSIGNED TRAY. CASE COMPLETED (REVERSE SHOULDER REPLACEMENT) WITHOUT ANY DELAY AND TO NO KNOWN DETRIMENT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18661360 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 3, 2024Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Contamination /Decontamination Problem

    THE TRAY HAS A VERY TINY BREAK, AND THIS DO NOT AFFECT ANY FUNCTIONALITY OF THE INSTRUMENTS. ADDITIONAL EVENT INFORMATION: ON A PLASTIC RACK/CONTAINER, THERE IS PRINTED TEXT ATTACHED COMING OUT FROM THE PAPER TABLE OF CONTENTS ON THE BOTTOM (230799923). THAT RACK IS ALSO BROKEN. THERE WERE INSTRUMENTS THAT WERE DIRTY INSIDE, INCLUDING GLEN RESURFACING REAMER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18440833 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 3, 2023Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED. A. WAS THERE ANY SPECIFIC ALLEGATION AGAINST THE METAGLENE POSITIONER PLATE AND APG+ QC DRIVER SHAFT? NO. B. WAS/WERE THERE ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE/S THAT AFFECTED THE PATIENT, BECAUSE OF THE REPORTED EVENT? NO. C. WAS THERE A SURGICAL DELAY? IF YES, WHAT IS THE DURATION OF THE DELAY? NO. D. DID THIS EVENT HAPPEN INTRA-OP? YES, AS PART OF REAMING THE GLENOID SURFACE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18065405 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 1, 2023Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    DURING REAMING OF THE PATIENTS GLENOID, IT BECAME APPARENT THAT THE GLENOID REAMER WAS NOT SHARP AND SURGEON HAD TO USE A DIFFERENT REAMER IN ORDER FOR THE IMPLANT TO SIT ON THE BLEEDING BONE. THERE WAS NO DELAY IN SURGERY OR ANY PATIENT SAFETY CONCERNS. THE REAMER SIMPLY NEEDS TO BE REPLACED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18050904 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 3, 2023Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE GLENOID REAMER WAS BECOMING DULL AND NEEDS TO BE REPLACED. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17859978 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 12, 2023Failure to Cut; Naturally Worn; Failure to Cut; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INSTRUMENT HAD DETERIORATED OVER TIME DURING NUMEROUS OPERATIONS IN THEATRE. THE INSTRUMENT HAD BECOME VERY BLUNT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17304606 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 10, 2023Failure to Cut; Naturally Worn; Failure to Cut; Naturally Worn

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED. INDICATED, THAT THE REAMER JUST SPINS. AS OPPOSED TO FORWARD AND BACKWARD REAMING ACTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17287631 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 10, 2023Failure to Cut; Naturally Worn; Failure to Cut; Naturally Worn

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED INDICATED THAT THE REAMER JUST SPINS AS OPPOSED TO FORWARD AND BACKWARD REAMING ACTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17287544 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 10, 2023Failure to Cut; Naturally Worn; Failure to Cut; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE GLENOID RESURFACING REAMER HAS GENERAL WEAR AND TEAR OVER TIME, THE SHARPNESS OF THE REAMER HAS DETERIORATED AND IS NO LONGER USABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17287408 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 10, 2023Failure to Cut; Naturally Worn; Failure to Cut; Naturally Worn

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED. INDICATED, THAT THE REAMER JUST SPINS. AS OPPOSED TO FORWARD AND BACKWARD REAMING ACTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17287289 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 27, 2023Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE GLENOID REAMERS WERE REMARKED AS DULL DURING CASES. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16823970 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 27, 2023Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE GLENOID REAMERS WERE REMARKED AS DULL DURING CASES. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16823967 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 4, 2023Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DEVICE WAS DULL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16674159 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 4, 2023Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS DULL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16673975 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 31, 2023Failure to Cut; Naturally Worn; Failure to Cut; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE REAMER WAS BLUNT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16273189 ↗

Other REAMER devices

All REAMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page