S-ROM 53-4700Recalls & reported problems
Depuy (Ireland) · S-ROM CONE REAMER SIZE 1N 12 B · Class 1
All models of S-ROM (185)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10603295172031), received between Apr 23, 2020 and Apr 23, 2020 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device-Device Incompatibility1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
Patient problems
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 23, 2020Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent
THE PRIMARY SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020 VIA THA. DURING THE SURGERY, WHEN THE SURGEON CONNECTED THE REAMER (P/N: 534700) TO THE SHAFT (P/N: 534107) AND REAMED BONE-MARROW CAVITY, THE SHAFT CAME OFF FROM THE REAMER AND REMAINED IN THE BONE CAVITY. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE SHAFT WITH A LONG PEAN FORCEPS UNDER X-RAY. AFTER THAT, WHEN THE SURGEON REAMED PROXIMAL BONE BECAUSE HE HAD DIFFICULTY IN REDUCING IN THE TRIALING, THE SHAFT CAME OFF FROM THE REAMER AGAIN AND REMAINED IN THE BODY. THE SECOND TIME, IT TOOK TIME TO REMOVE THE SHAFT BECAUSE THE SHAFT CAME OFF AT DEEP POINT OF THE BONE-MARROW CAVITY DESPITE THE NURSE TIGHTEN THE REAMER AND THE SHAFT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITHIN 30 MINUTES DELAY. IT WAS POSSIBLE THAT THE PATIENT WAS INVERSION POSITION WHEN THE SURGEON REAMED. AFTER THE SURGERY, WHEN THE SURGEON CHECKED THE DEVICES, HE COULD NOT INSERT THE SHAFT INTO THE REAMER FOR APPROPRIATELY DEPTH (SOME SOFT TISSUE OR BONE CHIPS MIGHT ADHERE THE SHAFT OR THE REAMER BECAUSE THE DEVICES WERE BEFORE CLEANING.). THE DEVICES HAD NO PROBLEM WHEN THE HOSPITAL CHECKED BEFORE THE SURGERY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 9991372 ↗
Other REAMER devices
- QUICKSET 2440-00-551Depuy (Ireland) · REAMER1,150 reports
- QUICKSET 2440-00-549Depuy (Ireland) · REAMER1,113 reports
- QUICKSET 2440-00-553Depuy (Ireland) · REAMER1,105 reports
- QUICKSET 2440-00-547Depuy (Ireland) · REAMER1,073 reports
- QUICKSET 2440-00-555Depuy (Ireland) · REAMER1,065 reports
- QUICKSET 2440-00-557Depuy (Ireland) · REAMER1,031 reports
- QUICKSET 2440-00-545Depuy (Ireland) · REAMER947 reports
- QUICKSET 2440-00-552Depuy (Ireland) · REAMER888 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page