DELTA XTEND 140760025Recalls & reported problems
Depuy (Ireland) · DELTA XTEND Cementless Metaglene +15mm HA · Class 2 · Implant
All models of DELTA XTEND (194)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295423652), received between Sep 1, 2017 and May 1, 2026 — classified as 9 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (2 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K120174, K192448, K192855); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
- Loss of Osseointegration2
- Osseointegration Problem2
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
Patient problems
- No Code Available3
- Inadequate Osseointegration2
- Pain2
- Unspecified Infection2
- Discomfort1
- Joint Laxity1
- Not Applicable1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 1, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REMOVAL OF ALL GLENOID IMPLANTS AND IMPLANTATION OF A CTA HEAD ONTO THE STEM DUE TO INFECTION. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2026. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT SHOULDER.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 25059197 ↗InjuryNov 12, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO BASEPLATE CAME LOOSE. DOCTOR DID THE ORIGINAL CASE WITH BONE GRAFT BEHIND THE METAGLEEN AND IF FAILED. HE REVISED IT TO A CTA HEMI AND REMOVED THE BASE PLATE AND POLY. DOI: (B)(6) 2022. DOR: UNKNOWN. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT SHOULDER.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 23531661 ↗InjuryJan 10, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INSTABILITY. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN SHOULDER.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 18483541 ↗InjuryJun 16, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A +15 LONG PEGGED METAGLENE, 3 SCREWS THROUGH BASEPLATE, A 42 STANDARD GLENOSPHERE, AND A 42/+3 POLY. THE ENTIRE HUMERAL STEM WAS RETAINED AND NOT CHANGED. UNFORTUNATELY HE IS CONFIRMED FOR AN INFECTION IN SURGERY TODAY. ALL PARTS AND PIECES WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER WAS PLACED TO TREAT THE INFECTION. DOI: ON (B)(6) 2020, DOR: ON (B)(6) 2023, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT SHOULDER.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 17144483 ↗InjurySep 9, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS INSTABILITY. DOI: UNKNOWN, DOR: (B)(6) 2020, UNKNOWN AFFECTED SIDE.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 10509727 ↗InjurySep 3, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS INSTABILITY. NO SURGICAL DELAY IS NOTED. DOI: (B)(6) 2020. DOR: (B)(6) 2020; RIGHT SHOULDER.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 10491937 ↗InjuryNov 26, 2019Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS LOOSENING OF THE METAGLENE AT THE BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE. A FAILED GLENOID REVISION RECONSTRUCTION CONVERTED TO DELTA CTA . DOI: (B)(6) 2019; DOR: (B)(6) 2019; RIGHT SHOULDER.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; No Code Available
MAUDE report 9377570 ↗InjuryJun 15, 2018Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device
DER STATES THAT THE PATIENT HAD A DELTA REVERSE SHOULDER IMPLANTED APPROXIMATELY 2 YEARS AGO AND RECENTLY BEGAN TO EXPERIENCE PAIN AND DISCOMFORT IN HER SHOULDER. SURGEON EVALUATED THE PATIENT AND FOUND OUT THAT THE X-RAY¿S INDICATED THAT THE METAGLENE BASE PLATE WAS LOOSE, A BASE PLATE SCREW WAS BROKEN, AND THIS PATIENT WOULD NEED A REVISION. SURGEON WAS ASKED WHY HE THOUGHT THE METAGLENE CAME LOOSE AND HE SUSPECTED THAT DUE TO THE PATIENT USING HER ARM TO WALK WITH A CANE AND WALKER BECAUSE PATIENT RECENTLY HAD A KNEE REPLACEMENT. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, SURGEON SAID THE COMPONENTS WEREN¿T REALLY LOOSE AND THAT THE BASE PLATE HAD MIGRATED DUE TO THE POOR BONE QUALITY. THE GLENOID WAS BONE GRAFTED AND A NEW METAGLENE, 4 SCREWS, GLENOSPHERE, AND HUMERAL CUP WERE IMPLANTED. DOI: APPROXIMATELY 2 YEARS AGO; DOR: (B)(6) 2018; RIGHT SHOULDER.
Patient problems: Discomfort; Not Applicable; Pain
MAUDE report 7605439 ↗InjurySep 1, 2017Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
DER STATES PATIENT HAD RIGHT REVERSE TSA LAST YEAR AND WENT TO DOCTOR BECAUSE HE SAID HE MOVED HIS SHOULDER AND HEARD A "POP" AND FELT PAIN. SURGEON TOOK X-RAYS AND SAW A BROKEN SCREW AND METAGLENE HAD COME LOOSE AT THE BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 6838244 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K120174, K192448, K192855. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0833-2018 · Aug 31, 2017 · TerminatedDELTA XTEND" Reverse Shoulder System Modular Centered and Eccentric Epiphysis Implants are intended for use in total shoulder or hemi-shoulder replacement procedures in patients wi
- Z-0834-2018 · Aug 31, 2017 · TerminatedDELTA XTEND" Reverse Shoulder System Modular Centered and Eccentric Epiphysis Implants intended for use in total shoulder or hemi-shoulder replacement procedures in patients with n
Other PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED devices
- DJO SURGICAL 508-32-204Encore Medical, L.P. · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED1 recall544 reports
- Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder 010000589Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED1 recall142 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130738203Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED175 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-432Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented1 recall117 reports
- Alliance® SBGL3007Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED162 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130760138Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED146 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130790030Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED132 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-436Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented124 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page