Skip to content

TruMatch 431001Recalls & reported problems

Depuy (Ireland) · TruMatch CT Plan · Class 1

All models of TRUMATCH (10)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295451907), received between Apr 21, 2022 and Oct 23, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient-Device Incompatibility” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Patient-Device Incompatibility2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 23, 2025Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MEDIAL SIDE FROM MEMORY STATED 3MM ISH CUT AND 9 FROM HIGH. BECAUSE OF TIBIAL WEAR MEDIAL/POSTERIOR IT WAS A 12MM CUT TO AVOID AIR SWING. WE FOUND THIS OUT INTRAOPERATIVELY BUT DID SAY WHEN HE LOOKED AT PLAN IT WAS NOT ACCURATE AND QUESTIONED WHERE YOU TOOK LANDMARKS PARTICULARLY ON THE MEDIAL SIDE OF TIBIA.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23366235 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 21, 2022Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SURGEON ONLY REMOVED 5MM OFF THE MEDIAL DISTAL FEMORAL CONDYLE LEAVING THE PATIENT FLEXED IN EXTENSION. THE DISTAL FEMORAL CUTTING GUIDE WAS SET AT 8 DEGREES OF VALGUS AND 9MM OFF THE DISTAL FEMORAL CONDYLE. WE NEEDED TO RECUT THE DISTAL FEMUR AND PROXIMAL TIBIA TWICE. THE PATIENT ALSO LOOKED LIKE HE HAD A SLIGHT FLEXION CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO OPERATING, WAS THIS MISSED IN THE CT?"

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14171309 ↗

Other TEMPLATE devices

All TEMPLATE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page