TRUMATCHRecalls & reported problems across all models

We found 10 models of TRUMATCH by Depuy (Ireland) in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 68 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Jul 30, 2018 and Apr 17, 2026 — classified as 68 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Incorrect Measurement” (25 reports).

6 FDA recall records name at least one of these models by its device identifier.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works

TRUMATCH recalls

FDA recall records that name at least one of these models by its device identifier, newest first. Each recall usually covers specific models or lots, so check the details.

1. Aug 10, 2021Terminated

   Software: A coding error associated with the Fast3D Segmentation software. During the scanning process the three images required of the hip, knee and ankle may not be aligned, causing the anatomic landmark locations to potentially result in limb malalignment.

   Z-2400-2021 · Root cause: Software Design Change · Recall details · FDA record ↗

2. Aug 10, 2021Terminated

   Software: A coding error associated with the Fast3D Segmentation software. During the scanning process the three images required of the hip, knee and ankle may not be aligned, causing the anatomic landmark locations to potentially result in limb malalignment.

   Z-2399-2021 · Root cause: Software Design Change · Recall details · FDA record ↗

3. Aug 10, 2021Terminated

   Software: A coding error associated with the Fast3D Segmentation software. During the scanning process the three images required of the hip, knee and ankle may not be aligned, causing the anatomic landmark locations to potentially result in limb malalignment.

   Z-2397-2021 · Root cause: Software Design Change · Recall details · FDA record ↗

4. Aug 10, 2021Terminated

   Software: A coding error associated with the Fast3D Segmentation software. During the scanning process the three images required of the hip, knee and ankle may not be aligned, causing the anatomic landmark locations to potentially result in limb malalignment.

   Z-2396-2021 · Root cause: Software Design Change · Recall details · FDA record ↗

5. Aug 10, 2021Terminated

   Software: A coding error associated with the Fast3D Segmentation software. During the scanning process the three images required of the hip, knee and ankle may not be aligned, causing the anatomic landmark locations to potentially result in limb malalignment.

   Z-2395-2021 · Root cause: Software Design Change · Recall details · FDA record ↗

6. Aug 10, 2021Terminated

   Software: A coding error associated with the Fast3D Segmentation software. During the scanning process the three images required of the hip, knee and ankle may not be aligned, causing the anatomic landmark locations to potentially result in limb malalignment.

   Z-2394-2021 · Root cause: Software Design Change · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported TRUMATCH problems

TRUMATCH models

10 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.

• TRUMATCH 420916

  Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing
  1 recall33 reports
• TRUMATCH 42-0907

  Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing
  1 recall11 reports
• TRUMATCH 420578

  Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing
  1 recall7 reports
• TRUMATCH 420579

  Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing
  1 recall6 reports
• TRUMATCH 420581

  Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing
  1 recall1 report
• TRUMATCH 420917

  Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing
  1 recall0 reports
• TRUMATCH 42-0906

  Knee arthroplasty implantation system
  5 reports
• TRUMATCH 420918

  Prosthesis, knee, patellofemorotibial, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, mobile bearing
  2 reports
• TruMatch 431001

  TEMPLATE
  2 reports
• TRUMATCH 2000-42-062

  TEMPLATE
  1 report

Recent TRUMATCH adverse event reports

The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• MalfunctionApr 17, 2026Device-Device Incompatibility; No Apparent Adverse Event

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCRUB TECHS WERE HAVING ISSUES ATTACHING THE 2-PRONGED ATTACHMENT PIECE TO THE TIBIAL PIN BLOCKS BECAUSE THE HOLES SEEM TO BE MANUFACTURED SMALLER THAN PREVIOUSLY. IT HAS ALSO CREATED ISSUES FOR THE SURGEONS NOT BEING ABLE TO VISUALIZE THEIR ALIGNMENT AND SLOPE BECAUSE THE METAL PIECE WON¿T SIT FLUSH. A COUPLE OF BLOCKS HAVE BROKEN AT THAT JUNCTURE, AS THE SCRUB TECHS USE METAL INSTRUMENTS ATTEMPTING TO TAP IT IN FLUSH.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 24916573 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 17, 2026Device-Device Incompatibility; No Apparent Adverse Event

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCRUB TECHS WERE HAVING ISSUES ATTACHING THE 2-PRONGED ATTACHMENT PIECE TO THE TIBIAL PIN BLOCKS BECAUSE THE HOLES SEEM TO BE MANUFACTURED SMALLER THAN PREVIOUSLY. IT HAS ALSO CREATED ISSUES FOR THE SURGEONS NOT BEING ABLE TO VISUALIZE THEIR ALIGNMENT AND SLOPE BECAUSE THE METAL PIECE WON¿T SIT FLUSH. A COUPLE OF BLOCKS HAVE BROKEN AT THAT JUNCTURE, AS THE SCRUB TECHS USE METAL INSTRUMENTS ATTEMPTING TO TAP IT IN FLUSH.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 24916572 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 11, 2026Nonstandard Device; Device-Device Incompatibility

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCRUB TECHS WERE HAVING ISSUES ATTACHING THE 2-PRONGED ATTACHMENT PIECE TO THE TIBIAL PIN BLOCKS BECAUSE THE HOLES SEEM TO BE MANUFACTURED SMALLER THAN PREVIOUSLY. IT HAS ALSO CREATED ISSUES FOR THE SURGEONS NOT BEING ABLE TO VISUALIZE THEIR ALIGNMENT AND SLOPE BECAUSE THE METAL PIECE WON¿T SIT FLUSH. A COUPLE OF BLOCKS HAVE BROKEN AT THAT JUNCTURE, AS THE SCRUB TECHS USE METAL INSTRUMENTS ATTEMPTING TO TAP IT IN FLUSH.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 24852785 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 11, 2026Nonstandard Device; Device-Device Incompatibility

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCRUB TECHS WERE HAVING ISSUES ATTACHING THE 2-PRONGED ATTACHMENT PIECE TO THE TIBIAL PIN BLOCKS BECAUSE THE HOLES SEEM TO BE MANUFACTURED SMALLER THAN PREVIOUSLY. IT HAS ALSO CREATED ISSUES FOR THE SURGEONS NOT BEING ABLE TO VISUALIZE THEIR ALIGNMENT AND SLOPE BECAUSE THE METAL PIECE WON¿T SIT FLUSH. A COUPLE OF BLOCKS HAVE BROKEN AT THAT JUNCTURE, AS THE SCRUB TECHS USE METAL INSTRUMENTS ATTEMPTING TO TAP IT IN FLUSH.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 24847975 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 10, 2026Nonstandard Device; Device-Device Incompatibility

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCRUB TECHS WERE HAVING ISSUES ATTACHING THE 2-PRONGED ATTACHMENT PIECE TO THE TIBIAL PIN BLOCKS BECAUSE THE HOLES SEEM TO BE MANUFACTURED SMALLER THAN PREVIOUSLY. IT HAS ALSO CREATED ISSUES FOR THE SURGEONS NOT BEING ABLE TO VISUALIZE THEIR ALIGNMENT AND SLOPE BECAUSE THE METAL PIECE WON¿T SIT FLUSH. A COUPLE OF BLOCKS HAVE BROKEN AT THAT JUNCTURE, AS THE SCRUB TECHS USE METAL INSTRUMENTS ATTEMPTING TO TAP IT IN FLUSH.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 24840930 ↗
• MalfunctionFeb 26, 2026Patient-Device Incompatibility

  CASE TODAY THAT DID NOT GO GREAT. SEEMED TO UNDER RESECT, SEEMED EXCESSIVELY ER AND DISTAL FEMORAL CUT WAS LIGHT LATERALLY. HAD TO TAKE MORE TIBIA IN ORDER TO CREATE SPACE. JOINT RECONSTRUCTION SIDE AFFECTED: RIGHT SIDE QUANTITY AFFECTED: 1. WAS THERE ANY REPORTED PATIENT OR USER HARM? NO. WAS THERE A SIGNIFICANT DELAY? NO.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 24456131 ↗
• MalfunctionFeb 24, 2026Patient-Device Incompatibility

  SURGEON WAS NOT HAPPY WITH THE FIT OF THE TIBIAL BLOCK ON THIS PATIENT. WHEN THE LATERAL SIDE ENGAGED, THE MEDIAL SIDE WAS WAY OFF. WE WERE FORCED TO ABORT TO MANUAL INSTRUMENTATION. THERE WAS NO PATIENT OR USER HARM. AFFECTED: RIGHT SIDE.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 24431547 ↗
• MalfunctionFeb 20, 2026Device-Device Incompatibility

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT TRUMATCH CT FEM CUT TIB PIN R AND HP EM TIBIAL JIG UPROD WERE INVOLVED IN A REPORTED EVENT. DURING A PROCEDURE, THE HP DOWNROD DID NOT FULLY ENGAGE WITH THE TRUMATCH TIBIA PIN GUIDE, ONLY INSERTING ABOUT HALFWAY. DESPITE THIS, ALIGNMENT WAS ACHIEVED TO SATISFACTION, AND THERE WERE NO SURGICAL DELAYS OR ISSUES. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM OR SIGNIFICANT DELAY ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVENT.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 24402735 ↗
• MalfunctionOct 23, 2025Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MEDIAL SIDE FROM MEMORY STATED 3MM ISH CUT AND 9 FROM HIGH. BECAUSE OF TIBIAL WEAR MEDIAL/POSTERIOR IT WAS A 12MM CUT TO AVOID AIR SWING. WE FOUND THIS OUT INTRAOPERATIVELY BUT DID SAY WHEN HE LOOKED AT PLAN IT WAS NOT ACCURATE AND QUESTIONED WHERE YOU TOOK LANDMARKS PARTICULARLY ON THE MEDIAL SIDE OF TIBIA.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 23366235 ↗
• MalfunctionAug 5, 2025Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

  THE TIBIAL RESECTION WAS VERY CONSERVATIVE DESPITE THE PLAN RECOMMENDING A 10MM POLY. ALSO, IT LOOKED LIKE THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT INTERNAL ROTATION RATHER THAN THE 3D EXTERNAL PLANNED. SURGICAL TEAM HAD TO RESORT TO STANDARD INSTRUMENTS.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 22720019 ↗
• MalfunctionMay 1, 2025Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED AND STATED THAT THE LACK OF ACCURACY OF THE PIN GUIDE DUE TO THE POSTERIOR SLOPE OVER 10. EVENT OCCURRED DURING INTRA-OP.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 21941707 ↗
• MalfunctionMar 4, 2025Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6) 2025. CARTILAGE MODEL PREDICTED 2MM OF CARTILAGE ON THE MEDIAL PLATEAU OF THE PROXIMAL TIBIA. SALES REPRESENTATIVE STATED THAT THE MEDIAL FOOT OF THE PIN GUIDE WAS AIR BALLING AND THE PATIENT HAD NO CARTILAGE REMAINING ON MEDIAL SIDE. THEY ENDED UP RE-CUTTING THE TIBIA BY AN ADDITIONAL 4MM AND THE FEMUR BY 2MM. RELEASED PCL TO OPEN FLEXION GAP AND USED 5MM TIBIA POLY. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 21518309 ↗
• MalfunctionMar 3, 2025Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CARTILAGE MODEL PREDICTED 2MM OF CARTILAGE ON THE MEDIAL PLATEAU OF THE PROXIMAL TIBIA. THE SALES REP STATED THAT THE MEDIAL FOOT OF THE PIN GUIDE WAS AIRBALLING AND THE PATIENT HAD NO CARTILAGE REMAINING ON MEDIAL SIDE. THEY DISCOVERED A GOOD HOME FOR THE GUIDE DESPITE MEDIAL FOOT NOT CONTACTING. THE DOWN ROD WAS RUNNING INTO THE LEG WHEN CHECKING ALIGNMENT. AFTER PINNING, THE CUTTING BLOCK WAS PLACED AND DOWN ROD WAS CHECKED AGAIN, THE SLOPE AND ALIGNMENT APPEARED CORRECT. THEY MADE THE CUT AND SLOPE APPEARED CORRECT BUT WAS STILL TIGHT IN FLEXION, THEREFOR THE RECUT AND RELEASED PCL TO OPEN FLEXION GAP. IT WAS STATED THAT THE FEET OF THE GUIDE ARE SUPPOSED TO CONTACT THE PLATEAUS OF THE PROXIMAL TIBIA. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED AND ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED FOR REPORTING. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 21503669 ↗
• MalfunctionSep 24, 2024Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

  THE CASE STARTED AS USUAL, WITH A STANDARD APPROACH TO REMOVING SOFT TISSUES, FAT PAD ETC. SURGEON HAS DONE SEVERAL TRUMATCH CASES OVER THE YEARS AND UNDERSTANDS NOT TO REMOVE ANY OSTEOPHYTES BEFORE PLACING THE BLOCKS. BOTH FEMORAL AND TIBIAL GUIDES WERE OPENED AFTER CHECKING THAT THE PATIENT MATCHED THE TRUMATCH REFERENCE FOR THE CASE. THE FEMORAL BLOCK WAS OFFERED UP TO THE FEMUR FIRST AND IT BECAME CLEAR VERY QUICKLY THAT SOMETHING WAS INCORRECT ON THE ANTERIOR SURFACE. WE CHECKED THE PROPOSAL AND THEN CHECKED THE BLOCKS AND THE PROPOSAL DID NOT OFFER A PATHWAY TO SECURE THE BLOCKS. THE SURGEON TRIED TO MANIPULATE THE BLOCK TO FIT BUT IT BECAME CLEAR THAT HE WOULD NEED TO CUT OSTEOPHYTES FROM THE ANTERIOR MEDIAL COMPARTMENT OF THE KNEE. THIS WAS DONE WITH MINIMAL AMOUNTS BEING TAKEN THEN THE BLOCK WAS OFFERED UP FOR FITMENT, IT WOULDN'T FIT, SO MORE BONE WAS TAKEN ON ANOTHER 3 OCCASIONS, TO THE POINT WHERE THE SURGEON WAS UNABLE TO MAKE ANY ADDITIONAL CUTS AS HE HAD REACHED THE PATIENT'S TRUE ANATOMY. THE BLOCK AT THIS POINT WAS STILL SITTING PROUD OF THE POSTERIOR CONDYLES, THE DISTAL SURFACE AND THE ANTERIOR BY AROUND 12MM, SO NOT IDEAL FOR THE PIN POSITIONS. SURGEON THEN DECI

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 20289845 ↗
• MalfunctionMay 10, 2024Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROXIMAL TIBIA RESECTION WAS CUT WITH APPROXIMATELY 2.5 DEGREES OF ANTERIOR SLOPE. THE PROPOSED PLAN USING THE TIBIA PIN GUIDE WAS SET TO 3 DEGREES OF POSTERIOR SLOPE.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 19288208 ↗

Other Depuy (Ireland) products

• ATTUNE1,475 models · 41,078 reports · 35 recalls
• QUICKSET66 models · 21,038 reports
• PINNACLE198 models · 7,240 reports
• DELTA XTEND194 models · 5,353 reports
• P.F.C. SIGMA487 models · 5,192 reports · 1 recall
• INHANCE202 models · 4,578 reports
• SMARTSET7 models · 4,415 reports
• SIGMA380 models · 3,831 reports