Skip to content

DELTA XTEND 1307-20-111Recalls & reported problems

Depuy (Ireland) · DELTA XTEND Modular 145 Degree Epiphysis POROCOAT SIZE 1 - CENTERED · Class 2 · Implant

All models of DELTA XTEND (194)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295510215), received between May 11, 2023 and Sep 17, 2026 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 2 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
  • Osseointegration Problem3

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection6
  • Inadequate Osseointegration3
  • Pain2
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Joint Laxity1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 17, 2026Osseointegration Problem

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50807367 ↗
  • InjuryJan 26, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD INCREASED PAIN DUE TO HUMERAL FRACTURE. SURGEON REMOVED A SIZE 10 GLOBAL UNITE STEM, 145 SIZE 1 CENTERED EPIPHYSIS, AND A 38 +3 STANDARD HUMERAL CUP. SURGEON THEN CEMENTED A SIZE 10 GLOBAL UNITE REVISION STEM, 145 SIZE 1 CENTERED EPIPHYSIS, AND A 38 +3 STANDARD HUMERAL CUP. DOI: (B)(6) 2025. DOR: (B)(6) 2026. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT SHOULDER.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Pain

    MAUDE report 24179931 ↗
  • InjuryJan 6, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION. IT WAS STATED THAT THE METEGLENE WAS LOOSE. LOOSENING INTERFACE WAS MARKED AS BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. DOI: (B)(6) 2025. DOR: (B)(6) 2025. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23976173 ↗
  • InjuryJun 6, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S SHOULDER BECAME INFECTED AND HARDWARE NEEDED TO BE REMOVED. DOI: (B)(6) 2022. DOR: (B)(6) 2025. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT SHOULDER.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 22160845 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT CONTRACTED AN INFECTION, SO ALL IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED AND A ANTIBIOTIC SPACER WAS PUT IN PLACE. THERE WAS STEM LOOSENING AT NON-CEMENT INTERFACE. SURGICAL DELAY WAS UNKNOWN. DOI: (B)(6) 2024. DOE: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 21104835 ↗
  • InjuryJul 19, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED: A. WHAT WAS THE PRIMARY REASON FOR REVISION? WAS IT PAIN OR INFECTION OR INSTABILITY? B. WAS THE PATIENT REVISED FOR PAIN AND INFECTION FOUND UPON REVISION ? OR INFECTION WAS FOUND EARLIER? "IT WAS REVISED FOR PAIN AND FOUND INTRAOPERATIVELY TO BE GROSSLY INFECTED."

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 19781855 ↗
  • InjuryOct 9, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT UNDERWENT A RIGHT DELTA XTEND REVISION FOR INFECTION. ALL COMPONENTS REMOVED AND CEMENT SPACER PUT IN. PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY. DATE OF ORIGINAL SURGERY WAS (B)(6) 2023.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 17894120 ↗
  • InjuryMay 11, 2023Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    PATIENT REVISED DUE TO STEM LOOSENED. NO SURGICAL DELAY WAS THERE. DOI: (B)(6) ,2021. DOR: (B)(6) ,2023. AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 16910013 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page