Skip to content

INHANCE 5503-00-020Recalls & reported problems

Depuy (Ireland) · INHANCE SHOULDER SYSTEM NON-LOCKING SCREW 20mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of INHANCE (202)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295546849), received between Oct 31, 2022 and Mar 17, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Insert” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Insert4
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Joint Laxity1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 17, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    SUBJECT ID: (B)(6). STUDY NO: (B)(6). CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PERSISTENT INSTABILITY IN THE LEFT SHOULDER FOLLOWING A REVERSE TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY, DESPITE INITIAL POSTOPERATIVE IMPROVEMENT. IMAGING CONFIRMED STABLE ALIGNMENT OF THE IMPLANT, AND THE INSTABILITY DID NOT RESULT IN A TRUE GLENOHUMERAL DISLOCATION. PERSISTENT SYMPTOMS LED TO A DIAGNOSTIC CT SCAN TO ASSESS PROSTHESIS STABILITY AND POSITION. DEVICE RELATED: POSSIBLE (HUMERAL STEMLESS IMPLANT: YES); PROCEDURE RELATED: POSSIBLE; DATE OF EVENT: (B)(6) 2026; DATE OF IMPLANT: (B)(6) 2025; DATE OF REVISION: NO INFORMATION PROVIDED; DEVICE LOCATION: LEFT. TREATMENT/IMPACT: DIAGNOSTIC INTERVENTION (CT). DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS USED: CATALOG NUMBER: 520000036; LOT NUMBER: 662988; COMPONENT TYPE: HUMERAL; DESCRIPTION: INHANCE SHOULDER SYSTEM STEMLESS MEDIUM DIAMETER 36MM CEMENTLESS. CATALOG NUMBER: 550011240; LOT NUMBER: 664496; COMPONENT TYPE: : BASEPLATE; DESCRIPTION: INHANCE SHOULDER SYSTEM MODULAR UNITI PLATFORM BASEPLATE SMALL Ø24MM CEMENTLESS. CATALOG NUMBER: 550035600; LOT NUMBER: 206439; COMPONENT TYPE: SCREW; DESCRIPTION: INHANCE SHOULDER SYSTEM CENTRAL SCREW Ø6.0 X 35MM. CATALOG NUMB

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Pain

    MAUDE report 24616505 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 28, 2022Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW PENETRATED THE MODULAR BASEPLATE DURING REVERSE SHOULDER INHANCE PROCEDURE. 15MIN SURGICAL DELAY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16062306 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 20, 2022Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON HAD ANOTHER SCREW GO THROUGH A BASEPLATE. THE INCIDENT INVOLVED A SELF-DRILLING SCREW AND A LARGE BASEPLATE. HE DID NOT USE A NON-LOCKING SCREW PRIOR TO USING THE SELF-DRILLING SCREW. WHEN THINKING ABOUT WHY THE SURGEON IS THE ONLY ONE SEEING THIS ISSUE, IT WAS HYPOTHESIZED THAT HE IS DAMAGING THE THREADS WITH THE BASEPLATE IMPACTOR HANDLE WHEN IT IS USED WITHOUT THE INSERTER ROD. THE SURGEON'S TECHNIQUE IS AS FOLLOWS: INSERT THE BASEPLATE WITH THE BASEPLATE INSERTER ROD, WITHOUT THE IMPACTOR HANDLE ASSEMBLED REMOVE THE BASEPLATE INSERTER ROD AND USE THE IMPACTOR HANDLE TO SEAT THE BASEPLATE. OTHER SURGEONS REPORT THAT THEY USE THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCT (IMPACTOR HANDLE AND ROD) TO SEAT THE GLENOID. ANOTHER SURGEON ONLY USES THE IMPACTOR ROD TO SEAT THE GLENOID. THIS IS A SHOULDER RECONSTRUCTION INHANCE DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16013998 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 31, 2022Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON HAD IMPLANTED A SMALL BASEPLATE WITH A 25MM CENTRAL SCREW. HE WAS LOOKING TO GAIN SOME ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION, SO HE ASKED FOR THE PERIPHERAL DRILL SO HE COULD DRILL FOR SOME NON LOCKING SCREWS. THE DRILL GUIDE WAS USED, AND THEN THE SURGEON MEASURED FOR A 20MM SCREW. WHEN IMPLANTING THE SCREW, THE SURGEON SAID THAT THE SCREW WENT DIRECTLY THROUGH THE BASEPLATE. HE ASKED FOR A DIFFERENT 20MM NON-LOCKING SCREW, AND THAT SCREW ALSO WENT THROUGH THE BASEPLATE. AT THIS POINT, THE SURGEON OPTED TO IMPLANT LOCKING SCREWS, SO HE ASKED FOR THE SELF DRILLING & LOCKING SCREW PACK. WHEN IMPLANTING ONE OF THE LOCKING SCREWS, THAT ALSO WENT THROUGH THE BASEPLATE. WHEN THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO BACK THE LOCKING SCREW OUT, HE INFORMED ME THAT IT MUST HAVE CROSS THREADED ITSELF INTO THE PLATE, WHERE IT EVENTUALLY LOCKED INTO THE PLATE. HE ASKED THAT I WRITE THESE IMPLANTS UP AND HAVE THE SCREWS RETURNED TO BE ANALYZED. HE ALSO MENTIONED TO ME HIS DISAPPOINTMENT IN THE ¿PICK & STICK¿ ASPECT OF THE PERIPHERAL SCREWS. HE SAID THAT THEY JUST DON¿T SEEM TO LOCK ONTO THE T20 SCREWDRIVER THE WAY THAT THEY SHOULD. THERE WAS NO REPORTED LOOSENING. THERE WAS A REPORTED SURGIC

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15698614 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 31, 2022Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON HAD IMPLANTED A SMALL BASEPLATE WITH A 25MM CENTRAL SCREW. HE WAS LOOKING TO GAIN SOME ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION, SO HE ASKED FOR THE PERIPHERAL DRILL SO HE COULD DRILL FOR SOME NON LOCKING SCREWS. THE DRILL GUIDE WAS USED, AND THEN THE SURGEON MEASURED FOR A 20MM SCREW. WHEN IMPLANTING THE SCREW, THE SURGEON SAID THAT THE SCREW WENT DIRECTLY THROUGH THE BASEPLATE. HE ASKED FOR A DIFFERENT 20MM NON-LOCKING SCREW, AND THAT SCREW ALSO WENT THROUGH THE BASEPLATE. AT THIS POINT, THE SURGEON OPTED TO IMPLANT LOCKING SCREWS, SO HE ASKED FOR THE SELF DRILLING & LOCKING SCREW PACK. WHEN IMPLANTING ONE OF THE LOCKING SCREWS, THAT ALSO WENT THROUGH THE BASEPLATE. WHEN THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO BACK THE LOCKING SCREW OUT, HE INFORMED ME THAT IT MUST HAVE CROSS THREADED ITSELF INTO THE PLATE, WHERE IT EVENTUALLY LOCKED INTO THE PLATE. HE ASKED THAT I WRITE THESE IMPLANTS UP AND HAVE THE SCREWS RETURNED TO BE ANALYZED. HE ALSO MENTIONED TO ME HIS DISAPPOINTMENT IN THE ¿PICK & STICK¿ ASPECT OF THE PERIPHERAL SCREWS. HE SAID THAT THEY JUST DON¿T SEEM TO LOCK ONTO THE T20 SCREWDRIVER THE WAY THAT THEY SHOULD. THERE WAS NO REPORTED LOOSENING. THERE WAS A REPORTED SURGIC

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15698612 ↗

Other prosthesis, shoulder, semi-constrained, metal/polymer + additive, cemented devices

All prosthesis, shoulder, semi-constrained, metal/polymer + additive, cemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page