INHANCE 5507-06-100Recalls & reported problems
Depuy (Ireland) · INHANCE SHOULDER SYSTEM KICKSTAND Augment 6mm CEMENTLESS · Class 2 · Implant
All models of INHANCE (202)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295546948), received between Feb 6, 2024 and Aug 27, 2025 — classified as 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Insert” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Insert6
- Naturally Worn2
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information4
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 27, 2025Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE THREAD ON THE KICKSTAND WOULD NOT LOCK IN THE BASEPLATE. DOE: (B)(6) 2025. AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN SHOULDER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22906733 ↗MalfunctionOct 23, 2024Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LEFT REVERSE TSA FOR HUMERAL SIDED REVISION, GLENOID EROSION. THE ENHANCE GLENOID WAS PREPPED FOR A 6MM KICKSTAND VIA SURGICAL TECHNIQUE. KICKSTAND IMPLANT WOULD NOT SCREW INTO BASEPLATE. ANOTHER KICKSTAND IMPLANT WAS OPENED AND INSERTED AFTER REDRILLING FOR A 6MM AUGMENT.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 20513389 ↗MalfunctionSep 6, 2024Difficult to Insert; Naturally Worn; Difficult to Insert; Naturally Worn
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED: A. WAS THERE ANY PATIENT HARM RELATED TO THE EVENT? NO PATIENT HARM DUE TO EVENT. B. WAS THERE ANY SURGICAL DELAY RELATED TO THE EVENT? YES, THERE WAS A 15 MINUTE DELAY DUE TO EVENT. C. IS THERE ANY PATIENT CONSEQUENCE AGAINST THE REPORTED PRODUCT? YES, AUGMENT WAS UNABLE TO BE USED. AS A RESULT, SURGEON ESTIMATED THAT GLENOID COVERAGE WAS AT APPROXIMATELY 80%, THUS WARRANTING THE NEED FOR AUGMENTATION THAT WAS UNFORTUNATELY UNABLE TO BE PERFORMED. D. WAS THERE ANY ALLEGATION WITH THE BASEPLATE/METAGLENE? NO ALLEGATION WITH THE BASEPLATE. THE CENTRAL SCREW AND PERIMETER LOCKING SCREWS THAT WERE USED WENT IN WITH NO ISSUES AND APPEARED TO ENGAGE PROPERLY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20155645 ↗MalfunctionAug 15, 2024Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE AUGMENT ON DEMAND WAS PREPPED VIA SURGICAL PROTOCOL. KICKSTAND IMPLANT WOULD NOT ENGAGE THREADS OF IMPLANT. SECOND IMPLANT WAS PUT IN SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 19990086 ↗MalfunctionJul 2, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW STRIPPED OUT. AFTER 2 ATTEMPTS, A NEW SCREW WAS USED AND PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT SHOULDER.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 19656299 ↗MalfunctionMay 2, 2024Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A RIGHT RTSA, SURGEON COULD NOT GET KICKSTAND IMPLANT TO DEFINITIVELY LOCK IN BASEPLATE. REPORTED A 5 MINUTE DELAY AS THEY ATTEMPTED TO RE-DRILL, RE INSERT AND FINALLY OPENED ANOTHER IMPLANT WHICH LOCKED INTO THE BASE PLATE ON FIRST ATTEMPT. DOE: (B)(6) 2024 AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT SHOULDER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19228391 ↗MalfunctionFeb 6, 2024Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE AUGMENT WOULD NOT SCREW INTO THE BASEPLATE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18652857 ↗
Other prosthesis, shoulder, semi-constrained, metal/polymer + additive, cemented devices
- Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder 115310Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · prosthesis, shoulder, semi-constrained, metal/polymer + additive, cemented1 death99 reports
- INHANCE 5120-00-110Depuy (Ireland) · prosthesis, shoulder, semi-constrained, metal/polymer + additive, cemented75 reports
- Comprehensive® Reverse Shoulder XL-115364Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · prosthesis, shoulder, semi-constrained, metal/polymer + additive, cemented1 recall7 reports
- Comprehensive® Reverse Shoulder XL-115366Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · prosthesis, shoulder, semi-constrained, metal/polymer + additive, cemented1 recall4 reports
- Comprehensive® Reverse Shoulder 180550Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · prosthesis, shoulder, semi-constrained, metal/polymer + additive, cemented2 deaths43 reports
- Comprehensive® Reverse Shoulder 180551Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · prosthesis, shoulder, semi-constrained, metal/polymer + additive, cemented42 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 521-07-246Encore Medical, L.P. · prosthesis, shoulder, semi-constrained, metal/polymer + additive, cemented42 reports
- Comprehensive® 110031399Zimmer, Inc. · prosthesis, shoulder, semi-constrained, metal/polymer + additive, cemented1 death36 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page