Skip to content

CARDINAL HEALTH ASU1201Recalls & reported problems

Cardinal Health 200, LLC · Trumpet Valve, Hydroline, 5mm x 33cm Probe, Double Spike · Class 1

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
15
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 15 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10630140169700), received between Apr 18, 2018 and Sep 18, 2018 — classified as 15 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Suction Problem” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Suction Problem6
  • Failure to Read Input Signal4
  • Mechanical Problem2
  • Nonstandard Device2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Defective Device1
  • Device Inoperable1
  • Obstruction of Flow1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient9
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient4
  • No Information2

Recent adverse event reports

The 15 most recent of 15 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 18, 2018Nonstandard Device; Obstruction of Flow

    THE SUCTION CANNULA IS BLOCKED WHEN IT IS ON CONTINUOUS SUCTION.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 7887957 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 10, 2018Mechanical Problem

    THE ISSUE WAS MET WITH 3 MEDICAL DEVICES OF THIS TYPE: A LACK OF ASPIRATION AND WASHING.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7773297 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 19, 2018Partial Blockage; Nonstandard Device

    THE SUCTION BUTTON FOR ASPIRATION STAYS BLOCKED. THE BUTTON DOESN'T GO UP AFTER A PERIOD OF TIME WHEN THERE IS A LOT OF BLOOD ASPIRATION DURING INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7614975 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 1, 2018Failure to Read Input Signal

    CONTINUOUS SUCTION WITHOUT PRESSING THE SUCTION PISTON ON THE TRUMPET VALVE, THE RED CONTROL BUTTON DIDN'T WORK.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 7562833 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 16, 2018Defective Device

    HEPATECTOMY IN LAPAROSCOPY PROCEDURE. HYDROLINE PROBES TESTED PRIOR TO BE USE AND WERE REPORTED TO BE FUNCTIONAL, BUT AFTER FEW PRESSURES THE VALVE BECAME DEFECTIVE. 3 DIFFERENT PROBES USED ON THE SAME PATIENT. THE SUCTION PISTON HAS BEEN COMPLETELY BLOCKED 3 TIMES IN A ROW WITH 3 DIFFERENT DEVICES DURING AN INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7518918 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 20, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE COMPLAINT WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURING FACILITY FOR INVESTIGATION. ONCE THE INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETED A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE FILED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7447143 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 20, 2018Suction Problem

    THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7447140 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 19, 2018Suction Problem

    THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7444184 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 19, 2018Failure to Read Input Signal

    THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7444161 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 19, 2018Suction Problem

    THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7442908 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 19, 2018Device Inoperable; Suction Problem

    THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7442850 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 18, 2018Mechanical Problem; Failure to Read Input Signal

    THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7441470 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 18, 2018Suction Problem

    THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7440446 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 18, 2018Failure to Read Input Signal

    THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7440293 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 18, 2018Suction Problem

    THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7440085 ↗

Other CATHETER, IRRIGATION devices

All CATHETER, IRRIGATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page