CARDINAL HEALTH ASU1201Recalls & reported problems
Cardinal Health 200, LLC · Trumpet Valve, Hydroline, 5mm x 33cm Probe, Double Spike · Class 1
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 15
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 15 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10630140169700), received between Apr 18, 2018 and Sep 18, 2018 — classified as 15 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Suction Problem” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Suction Problem6
- Failure to Read Input Signal4
- Mechanical Problem2
- Nonstandard Device2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Defective Device1
- Device Inoperable1
- Obstruction of Flow1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient9
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient4
- No Information2
Recent adverse event reports
The 15 most recent of 15 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 18, 2018Nonstandard Device; Obstruction of Flow
THE SUCTION CANNULA IS BLOCKED WHEN IT IS ON CONTINUOUS SUCTION.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 7887957 ↗MalfunctionAug 10, 2018Mechanical Problem
THE ISSUE WAS MET WITH 3 MEDICAL DEVICES OF THIS TYPE: A LACK OF ASPIRATION AND WASHING.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7773297 ↗MalfunctionJun 19, 2018Partial Blockage; Nonstandard Device
THE SUCTION BUTTON FOR ASPIRATION STAYS BLOCKED. THE BUTTON DOESN'T GO UP AFTER A PERIOD OF TIME WHEN THERE IS A LOT OF BLOOD ASPIRATION DURING INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7614975 ↗MalfunctionJun 1, 2018Failure to Read Input Signal
CONTINUOUS SUCTION WITHOUT PRESSING THE SUCTION PISTON ON THE TRUMPET VALVE, THE RED CONTROL BUTTON DIDN'T WORK.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 7562833 ↗MalfunctionMay 16, 2018Defective Device
HEPATECTOMY IN LAPAROSCOPY PROCEDURE. HYDROLINE PROBES TESTED PRIOR TO BE USE AND WERE REPORTED TO BE FUNCTIONAL, BUT AFTER FEW PRESSURES THE VALVE BECAME DEFECTIVE. 3 DIFFERENT PROBES USED ON THE SAME PATIENT. THE SUCTION PISTON HAS BEEN COMPLETELY BLOCKED 3 TIMES IN A ROW WITH 3 DIFFERENT DEVICES DURING AN INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7518918 ↗MalfunctionApr 20, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE COMPLAINT WAS FORWARDED TO THE MANUFACTURING FACILITY FOR INVESTIGATION. ONCE THE INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETED A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE FILED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7447143 ↗MalfunctionApr 20, 2018Suction Problem
THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7447140 ↗MalfunctionApr 19, 2018Suction Problem
THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7444184 ↗MalfunctionApr 19, 2018Failure to Read Input Signal
THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7444161 ↗MalfunctionApr 19, 2018Suction Problem
THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7442908 ↗MalfunctionApr 19, 2018Device Inoperable; Suction Problem
THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7442850 ↗MalfunctionApr 18, 2018Mechanical Problem; Failure to Read Input Signal
THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7441470 ↗MalfunctionApr 18, 2018Suction Problem
THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7440446 ↗MalfunctionApr 18, 2018Failure to Read Input Signal
THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7440293 ↗MalfunctionApr 18, 2018Suction Problem
THE CUSTOMER CLAIMS THAT AFTER PRIMING THE DEVICE FOR USE, THE SUCTION BUTTON WOULD NOT RELEASE RESULTING IN CONTINUED SUCTION REQUIRING THEM TO REPLACE THE SYSTEM WITH A NEW ONE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NOT AT RISK. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AFTER THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7440085 ↗
Other CATHETER, IRRIGATION devices
- Navarre Opti-Drain NOD8LPTBard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION901 reports
- Navarre NNU8LPTBard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION736 reports
- BLAKE 2227Ethicon Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION331 reports
- Navarre NNU6LPTBard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION211 reports
- Navarre Opti-Drain NOD10LPTBard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION178 reports
- Navarre NNU10LPTBard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION127 reports
- BLAKE 2233Ethicon Inc. · CATHETER, IRRIGATION114 reports
- Vasoshield VH-5001Maquet Cardiovascular LLC · Catheter, Irrigation1 recall27 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page