Halyard 32771Recalls & reported problems
Avanos Medical, Inc. · HALYARD* ProLong Continuous Nerve Block Set - Block Bevel - 19 GA x 100 mm · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10680651327717), received between Oct 30, 2019 and Jan 10, 2020 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break3
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 10, 2020Break; Break
AVANOS MEDICAL, INC. RECEIVED A SINGLE REPORT THAT REFERENCED TWO DIFFERENT INCIDENCES, WHICH WERE ASSOCIATED WITH SEPARATE UNITS, INVOLVING TWO DIFFERENT EVENTS. THIS IS THE SECOND OF TWO REPORTS. REFER TO 2026095-2020-00006 FOR THE FIRST EVENT. PROCEDURE: ABDUCTOR CANAL BLOCK. IT WAS REPORTED THE PHYSICIAN WAS PERFORMING AN ABDUCTOR CANAL BLOCK ON A PATIENT'S LEG WHEN THE NERVE BLOCK NEEDLE BROKE. THE NEEDLE CRACKED IN TWO AT THE HUB OF THE NEEDLE, THE NEEDLE WAS RETRIEVED AND NOTHING WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT'S BODY. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9577048 ↗MalfunctionJan 10, 2020Break; Break
AVANOS MEDICAL, INC. RECEIVED A SINGLE REPORT THAT REFERENCED TWO DIFFERENT INCIDENCES, WHICH WERE ASSOCIATED WITH SEPARATE UNITS, INVOLVING TWO DIFFERENT EVENTS. THIS IS THE FIRST OF TWO REPORTS. REFER TO 2026095-2020-00007 FOR THE SECOND EVENT. PROCEDURE: ABDUCTOR CANAL BLOCK. IT WAS REPORTED THE PHYSICIAN WAS PERFORMING AN ABDUCTOR CANAL BLOCK ON A PATIENT'S LEG WHEN THE NERVE BLOCK NEEDLE BROKE. THE NEEDLE BROKE IN HALF, THE NEEDLE WAS RETRIEVED AND NOTHING WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT'S BODY. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9576992 ↗MalfunctionOct 30, 2019Break; Break
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED 31-OCT-2019 STATING "THE PATIENT WAS STUCK WITH THE NEEDLE THAT BROKE. IT DIDN'T BREAK CLOSE TO THE INSERTION SITE AND WAS REMOVED EASILY."
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9257161 ↗
Other Anesthesia conduction kit devices
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405671Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall68 reports
- ARROW IPN922678Teleflex Incorporated · Anesthesia conduction kit2 recalls0 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405672Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall27 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405673Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall10 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405637Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall7 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405707Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall4 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405609Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405735Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page