Halyard 39210Recalls & reported problems
Avanos Medical, Inc. · HALYARD* EchoLong 21? Bevel - 18 GA x 50 mm - Stimulating · Class 2
All models of Halyard (232)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10680651392104), received between Nov 7, 2017 and Nov 7, 2017 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 7, 2017Break; Break
FILL VOLUME: UNKNOWN; FLOW RATE: UNKNOWN ; PROCEDURE: SHOULDER ; CATHPLACE: INTERSCALENE CATHETER. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A CATHETER BREAK ASSOCIATED WITH PATIENT USAGE. A PATIENT'S WIFE REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED AND WAS MISSING. THE PATIENT HAD AN INTERSCALENE CATHETER PLACED FOR POST-OPERATIVE PAIN ON (B)(6) 2017. THE ANESTHESIOLOGIST PLACED THE CATHETER AND RECALLED THAT THERE WERE NO ISSUES AT THE TIME OF PLACEMENT. THE DOCTOR WAS UNSURE IF THE CATHETER TIP WAS GONE OR THE BLACK HAD WORN OFF. THE DOCTOR REQUESTED THAT THE PATIENT BRING IN THE CATHETER FOR INSPECTION DURING HIS POST-OPERATIVE VISIT ON (B)(6) 2017. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 01-NOV-2017 STATED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A FOLLOW-UP APPOINTMENT AND BROUGHT THE PUMP AND CATHETER TO THE APPOINTMENT. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS USED ON THE PATIENT WITH NO CONSEQUENCES OR INTERVENTIONS. NO DISCOMFORT OR RESISTANCE WAS EXPERIENCED DURING REMOVAL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7007832 ↗
Other Anesthesia conduction kit devices
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405671Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall68 reports
- ARROW IPN922678Teleflex Incorporated · Anesthesia conduction kit2 recalls0 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405672Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall27 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405673Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall10 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405637Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall7 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405707Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall4 reports
- BD Glaspak 405675Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405609Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page