Halyard 40787Recalls & reported problems
Avanos Medical, Inc. · HYHSURGPN,ON-Q-TBLOC,ECTUHY,-,4",5 · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10680651407877), received between Jul 20, 2017 and Mar 30, 2018 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 30, 2018Break; Break
FILL VOLUME: UNKNOWN. FLOW RATE: UNKNOWN . PROCEDURE: UNKNOWN . CATHPLACE: UNKNOWN. A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT A CATHETER SHEARED AWAY INSIDE OF A PATIENT DURING A NERVE BLOCK PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED 08-MAR-2018 STATED A SMALL PORTION OF THE DEVICE WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT. THIS OCCURRED WHILE PERFORMING A CONTINUOUS NERVE BLOC PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 7385859 ↗MalfunctionJul 20, 2017Break; Break
FILL VOLUME: 125 ML, FLOW RATE: UNKNOWN, PROCEDURE: "TKA", CATHPLACE: ADDUCTOR CANAL. IT WAS INITIALLY REPORTED THAT A CATHETER BROKE OFF IN A PATIENT UPON THE REMOVAL OF TEGADERM DRESSING. THE CATHETER TIP WAS ABLE TO BE REMOVED AND THERE WAS NO ASSOCIATED PATIENT INJURY TO NOTE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 11-JUL-2017 STATED THAT THE CATHETER BROKE DURING REMOVAL AND 9 CENTIMETERS OF THE DISTAL TIP REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. IT WAS REMOVED BY THE CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST WITH MOSQUITO FORCEPS. THERE WAS NO LONG TERM INJURY REPORTED FOR THE PATIENT. THE INITIAL PLACEMENT WAS EASY AND SMOOTH, WITH NO REPORTED ISSUES. THE REMOVAL WAS MET WITH NO RESISTANCE. THE DRESSING WAS QUICKLY REMOVED, AND WHEN THE CATHETER WAS VISUALIZED, IT SHEARED AND ONLY THE WIRE REMAINED VISIBLE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6727814 ↗
Other Anesthesia conduction kit devices
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405671Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall68 reports
- ARROW IPN922678Teleflex Incorporated · Anesthesia conduction kit2 recalls0 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405672Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall27 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405673Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall10 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405637Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall7 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405707Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall4 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405609Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
- BD Luer-Lok, BD Glaspak 405735Becton, Dickinson And Company · Anesthesia conduction kit1 recall3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page