Skip to content

BLAKE 2231Recalls & reported problems

Ethicon Inc. · Blake Silicone Drain, 19 FR round, hubless with 1/4" trocar · Class 1

All models of BLAKE (18)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031003590), received between Apr 12, 2018 and Nov 26, 2024 — classified as 6 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break4
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient5
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Not Applicable1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 26, 2024Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping; Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping

    IT WAS REPORTED A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RADICAL MASTECTOMY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024 AND A DRAIN WAS USED. DURING PROCEDURE, THAT WHEN THE STERILE PACKAGE WAS OPENED IN THE OR A HAIR WAS VISIBLE AND EMBEDDED IN THE PACKAGING. UNKNOWN AS TO HOW THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. DEVICE RETURNING.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20785178 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    TITLE: THE PREVENTIVE EFFECTS OF PERIOPERATIVE ORAL CARE ON SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS AFTER PANCREATIC CANCER SURGERY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. THE AIM OF THIS STUDY WAS TO INVESTIGATE THE PREVENTIVE EFFECTS OF PERIOPERATIVE ORAL CARE ON THE INCIDENCE OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS AFTER PANCREATIC CANCER SURGERY. BETWEEN FEBRUARY 1, 2011, AND DECEMBER 31, 2018, 103 PATIENTS WITH PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA WHO UNDERWENT PANCREATIC CANCER SURGERY WITH CURATIVE INTENT WERE INCLUDED IN THE STUDY. 75 PATIENTS RECEIVED PERIOPERATIVE ORAL CARE BY DENTISTS AND DENTAL HYGIENISTS (ORAL CARE GROUP), WHEREAS 28 DID NOT (CONTROL GROUP). IN THE ORAL CARE GROUP, THERE WERE 41 MALES AND 34 FEMALES WITH A MEAN AGE OF 70.4 +/-8.7 YEARS AND A MEAN BMI OF 22.3+/-3.2 KG/M2. IN THE CONTROL GROUP, THERE WERE 16 MALES AND 12 FEMALES WITH A MEAN AGE OF 64.6+/-10.0 YEARS AND A MEAN BMI OF 23.0+/-3.3 KG/M2. SURGICAL PROCEDURES THAT WERE PERFORMED INCLUDED PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY, DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY, AND STANDARD LYMPHADENECTOMY. BEFORE CLOSING THE SURGICAL INCISION, THE SURGEON REPLACED THEIR GLOVES, AND THE ABDOMINAL CAVITY WAS FLUSHED WITH 10 L OF SALINE SOLUTION. ABDOMINAL DRAINS (BLAKE DRAINS®,19 FR,

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 15114056 ↗
  • InjuryApr 26, 2021Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED A PATIENT UNDERWENT A HERNIA REPAIR ON (B)(6) 2021 AND A DRAIN WAS USED. WHEN THE DRAIN WAS REMOVED, IT BROKE AND PART OF IT REMAINED IN THE ABDOMEN. TO REMOVE THE PIECE THE PATIENT WAS RE-OPERATED ON. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 11723973 ↗
  • InjuryApr 26, 2021Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BILE DUCT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND A DRAIN WAS USED. WHEN THE DRAIN WAS REMOVED, IT BROKE AND PART OF IT REMAINED IN THE ABDOMEN. THE PATIENT WAS RE-OPERATED TO REMOVE THE PIECE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 11723409 ↗
  • InjuryApr 14, 2021Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED A RECIPIENT PATIENT UNDERWENT RENAL TRANSPLANT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND A DRAIN WAS USED. DURING DRAIN REMOVAL ON (B)(6) 2021, THE DRAIN BROKE AND WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT'S ABDOMEN (21CM). DEVICE BROKE AND WAS PARTIALLY LEFT WITHIN THE PATIENT. EMERGENCY OPERATION WAS DONE TO REMOVE THE DRAIN IN EMERGENCY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 11668276 ↗
  • InjuryApr 16, 2019Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2018 AND A DRAIN WAS USED. MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS TO REMOVE RECTUS SHEATH CATHETER (POST SURGERY TWO DAYS PRIOR) HOWEVER THIS RESULTED IN THE CATHETER BREAKING LEADING TO A FOREIGN BODY BEING LEFT IN PATIENT'S LOWER ABDOMEN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 8519916 ↗
  • InjuryApr 12, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE AND DRAIN WAS USED. THE DRAIN WAS REMOVED POSTOPERATIVELY BY AN CAREGIVER ON (B)(6) 2017. CT IMAGES WERE MADE ON (B)(6) 2017. THE CT IMAGES SHOWED THAT A PART OF THE DRAIN WAS LEFT IN THE ABDOMEN OF THE PATIENT. RE-OPERATION FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE DRAIN WAS NECESSARY, THIS WAS CARRIED OUT ON (B)(6) 2017.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Not Applicable

    MAUDE report 7425381 ↗

Other CATHETER, IRRIGATION devices

All CATHETER, IRRIGATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page