STRATAFIX SXPP1B113Recalls & reported problems
Ethicon, LLC · Knotless Tissue Control Device, Violet Unidirectional (Antibacterial) Synthetic Absorbable Device · Class 2 · Implant
All models of STRATAFIX (181)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Ethicon Stratafix knotless suture has 130 adverse event reports on record, with no deaths and 26 injuries. The reports mostly describe the barbed suture breaking, or the needle separating from the suture during use. Some mention wound opening, infection, or poor healing after surgery. Most say no clinical signs were reported. There are no recalls naming this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 131
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 26
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 131 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031236295), received between Oct 10, 2018 and Sep 16, 2026 — classified as 26 injuries, 105 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (81 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break81
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem28
- Material Separation13
- Positioning Failure7
- Material Integrity Problem6
- Difficult to Open or Remove Packaging Material1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions82
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient15
- Wound Dehiscence12
- Unspecified Infection10
- Pocket Erosion7
- Fluid Discharge6
- Impaired Healing6
- Scar Tissue4
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 131 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 16, 2026Break
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50789796 ↗MalfunctionAug 17, 2026Break
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50285442 ↗MalfunctionAug 5, 2026Material Separation
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50143111 ↗MalfunctionJul 7, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. NEEDLE AND THREAD SEPARATED DURING USE. THE REPORTED ISSUE DID NOT RESULT IN ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25735780 ↗MalfunctionJun 18, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A C-SECTION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING C-SECTION, THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE EASILY. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25548679 ↗InjuryJun 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A COLECTOMY ON (B)(6) 2026 AND A BARBED SUTURE WAS USED ON THE DERMIS. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A POSTOPERATIVE WOUND OPENING AFTER USING THE BARBED SUTURE IN AN INFECTION CASE. THE DOCTOR OPINED THAT IT WAS ORIGINALLY AN INFECTIOUS DISEASE CASE AND THERE WAS NO CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP WITH THE BARBED SUTURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection; Wound Dehiscence
MAUDE report 25474139 ↗MalfunctionApr 29, 2026Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A OB-GYN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, DURING AN UNKNOWN OB-GYN SURGERY, THERE WAS NO LOOP WHEN THE PRODUCT WAS CHECKED BEFORE USE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. WHEN WE SEND THE SAMPLE TO YOU, WE WILL LET YOU KNOW ITS RETURN DATE AND TRACKING NUMBER. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25035825 ↗MalfunctionApr 29, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE CUSTOMER'S STITCHES BROKE WHILE USING OUR PRODUCT. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25032992 ↗MalfunctionApr 29, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE CUSTOMER'S STITCHES BROKE WHILE USING OUR PRODUCT. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED. SFXSPI PDS+ UNI VIO 18IN 4-0 SA PS-2 PMP (SXPP1B113): UNKNOWN. SFXSPI PDS+ UNI VIO 18IN 4-0 SA PS-2 PMP (SXPP1B113): LOT CODE/LOT CODE: 100XJU. LIST OF OTHER J&J PRODUCTS (NON-CUSTOMER COMPLAINT PRODUCTS) USED IN THE CASE SURGERY. HAS THERE BEEN A PATIENT OR USER INJURY REPORT? NO. ARE THERE ANY NOTICEABLE DELAYS? NO. IF AVAILABLE, PROVIDE THE PRODUCT ORDER NUMBER (PO).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25032401 ↗MalfunctionApr 7, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. DURING SURGERY THE NEEDLE AT THE SWAGE PART WAS BROKEN. IT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED THAT NO PIECES WERE LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24808783 ↗MalfunctionMar 18, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (TKA) PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, DURING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, THE SUTURE BROKE WHEN THE KNEE WAS BENT AFTER SUTURING. THE PRODUCT WAS USED ON THE DERMIS. THIS ISSUE OCCURRED DURING USE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ADDITIONAL SUTURE WAS PERFORMED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24627203 ↗MalfunctionMar 17, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THE DOCTOR PASSED THE NEEDLE THROUGH THE LOOP, THE LOOP CAME UNTIED. THIS ISSUE OCCURRED DURING USE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24617764 ↗MalfunctionFeb 23, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE WAS BROKEN DURING USE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24418662 ↗MalfunctionFeb 20, 2026Positioning Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A HYSTERECTOMY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, DURING OPEN ABDOMINAL TOTAL HYSTERECTOMY, THE DOCTOR TRIED TO START SUTURING BY PASSING THE NEEDLE THOUGH THE LOOP, BUT TEMPORARY FIXING COULD NOT BE DONE, AND THE DOCTOR COULD NOT SUTURE. THE PRODUCT WAS USED ON THE DERMIS. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. WHEN WE SEND THE SAMPLE TO YOU, WE WILL LET YOU KNOW ITS RETURN DATE AND TRACKING NUMBER. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24402685 ↗MalfunctionJan 15, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE WAS BROKEN DURING USE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24084381 ↗MalfunctionDec 31, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A SEMI OPEN RIGHT VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY LOBECTOMY (BULLECTOMY (WEDGE RESECTION) FOR LUNG CANCER PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, DURING SEMI OPEN RIGHT VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY LOBECTOMY (BULLECTOMY (WEDGE RESECTION) FOR LUNG CANCER, IT WAS FOUND BY THE OPERATING ROOM STAFF BEFORE USING THE PRODUCT THAT WHEN THE PRODUCT WAS OPENED AND TRIED TO USE, THE SUTURE WAS BROKEN. THE PRODUCT WAS USED ON THE HYPODERMIS. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. WHEN WE SEND THE SAMPLE TO YOU, WE WILL LET YOU KNOW ITS RETURN DATE AND TRACKING NUMBER. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23936101 ↗MalfunctionDec 31, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A DECOMPRESSION AND FIXATION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025 AND A BARBED SUTURE WAS USED ON THE L3-5 VERTEBRAE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE WAS BROKEN FROM THE NEEDLE LIKE A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE-SUTURE AT THE 2ND STITCH DURING USE. THE DOCTOR SUTURED AGAIN TO FINISH THE WOUND CLOSURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23935108 ↗MalfunctionDec 18, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A C-SECTION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT, DURING C-SECTION, THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE. THE PRODUCT WAS USED ON THE DERMIS. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. WHEN WE SEND THE SAMPLE TO YOU, WE WILL LET YOU KNOW ITS RETURN DATE AND TRACKING NUMBER. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23840117 ↗MalfunctionDec 12, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (TKA) PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. DURING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, THE OPERATING ROOM NURSE REPORTED THAT DURING USE, THE CONNECTION PART BETWEEN THE NEEDLE AND THE SUTURE WERE DETACHED. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23790835 ↗MalfunctionSep 18, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. DURING AN UNKNOWN SURGERY, IT WAS FOUND THAT THERE HAD BEEN NO LOOP. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ADDITIONAL SUTURE WAS PERFORMED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23086170 ↗MalfunctionAug 4, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A C-SECTION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025 AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE LOOP WAS BROKEN WHEN STARTED TO USE IT AND THE SUTURE WAS BROKEN DURING USE. USE WAS STOPPED. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. FURTHER DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED FROM THE HP. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22703712 ↗MalfunctionMay 21, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. DURING A TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY, THE SUTURE WAS BROKEN DURING DERMOSTITCH. THE PRODUCT WAS USED ON THE DERMIS. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THE CUT PART WAS LIGATED AND ADDITIONAL SUTURE THAT THE REMAINING SKIN INCISION WAS SUTURED WITH ANOTHER SUTURE TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THE POSTOPERATIVE COURSE WAS UNEVENTFUL AFTER THE SURGERY. NO SAMPLE WILL BE RETURNED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22060409 ↗MalfunctionApr 17, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE BROKE HALFWAY THROUGH USE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21860104 ↗InjuryMar 31, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNI-COMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (UKA) ON AN UNKNOWN DATE IN (B)(6) 2025 AND A BARBED SUTURE WAS USED ON THE DERMIS. DURING THE PROCEDURE, A DIFFERENT SUTURE WAS USED ON THE SUBCUTANEOUS. WITHIN 2 WEEKS AFTER THE SURGERY, THE DERMIS WOUND DEHISCENCE OCCURRED ONCE BEFORE THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED. AT THAT TIME, AN ADDITIONAL SUTURE WAS PERFORMED WITH NYLON. THE SURGEON OPINED THAT THE BARBED SUTURE WAS NOT AT FAULT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence
MAUDE report 21730383 ↗MalfunctionMar 11, 2025Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CAESAREAN SECTION (C-SECTION) ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED FOR DERMIS SUTURING. THE BARB WAS NOT HOOKED ENOUGH, AND THE SUTURE WAS TURNED BACK EVEN WHEN SUTURING. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21580369 ↗
Other SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE devices
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A405Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE617 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A400Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE485 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A401Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE446 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A301Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE443 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP2B405Ethicon, LLC · Suture, surgical, absorbable, polydioxanone406 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A406Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE339 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A404Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE1 death319 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1B420Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE1 death229 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page