TEMPO 451403F5Recalls & reported problems
Cordis Corporation · CATH TEMPO 4F PIG 90CM 5SH · Class 2
All models of TEMPO (56)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705032007689), received between Jun 19, 2025 and Jun 20, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Degraded” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Degraded3
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 20, 2025Degraded; Degraded
AS REPORTED, WHEN INSERTING A 4F 90 CM TEMPO PIGTAIL (PIG) CATHETER INTO AN UNKNOWN SHEATH, THE PART ATTACHED TO THE HUB CAME LOOSE AND WAS BROKEN. THE TERM ¿LOOSE AND BROKEN¿ REFERRED TO A SPLIT IN AN AREA OF THE DEVICE. ONLY ONE DEVICE WAS USED IN THE PATIENT. THIS DEVICE DID NOT HAVE ANY PARTICLES NOTED. ALL THE ONES FROM THE SAME BATCH WERE COLLECTED, AND BASED ON THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED, TWO (2) STERILE DEVICES HAD PARTICLES INSIDE THE SEALED PACKAGING AND COULD NOT BE USED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE INVOLVED THE LEGS. THE TERM ¿LOOSE AND BROKEN¿ REFERRED TO A SPLIT IN AN AREA OF THE DEVICE. THE DAMAGE OBSERVED WAS DESCRIBED AS "FRAYED, SPLIT, OR TORN" AND WAS NOTICED DURING USE IN THE PATIENT. THE PRODUCT WAS STORED AND HANDLED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU), AND NO DAMAGE WAS NOTICED PRIOR TO OPENING THE PACKAGE. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE STERILE PACKAGING, WHICH WAS PREPPED PER THE IFU WITHOUT ANY ISSUES. ANOTHER TEMPO CATHETER WAS NOT USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE, SINCE TWO WERE FOUND TO CONTAIN PARTICLES INSIDE THE PACKAGING UPON INSPECTION; ONE OF THEM WAS SAVED, AND THE OTHER ONE WA
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22296524 ↗MalfunctionJun 20, 2025Degraded; Degraded
AS REPORTED, WHEN INSERTING A 4F 90 CM TEMPO PIGTAIL (PIG) CATHETER INTO AN UNKNOWN SHEATH, THE PART ATTACHED TO THE HUB CAME LOOSE AND WAS BROKEN. THE TERM ¿LOOSE AND BROKEN¿ REFERRED TO A SPLIT IN AN AREA OF THE DEVICE. ONLY ONE DEVICE WAS USED IN THE PATIENT. THIS DEVICE DID NOT HAVE ANY PARTICLES NOTED. ALL THE ONES FROM THE SAME BATCH WERE COLLECTED, AND BASED ON THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED, TWO (2) STERILE DEVICES HAD PARTICLES INSIDE THE SEALED PACKAGING AND COULD NOT BE USED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE INVOLVED THE LEGS. THE TERM ¿LOOSE AND BROKEN¿ REFERRED TO A SPLIT IN AN AREA OF THE DEVICE. THE DAMAGE OBSERVED WAS DESCRIBED AS "FRAYED, SPLIT, OR TORN" AND WAS NOTICED DURING USE IN THE PATIENT. THE PRODUCT WAS STORED AND HANDLED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU), AND NO DAMAGE WAS NOTICED PRIOR TO OPENING THE PACKAGE. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE STERILE PACKAGING, WHICH WAS PREPPED PER THE IFU WITHOUT ANY ISSUES. ANOTHER TEMPO CATHETER WAS NOT USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE, SINCE TWO WERE FOUND TO CONTAIN PARTICLES INSIDE THE PACKAGING UPON INSPECTION; ONE OF THEM WAS SAVED, AND THE OTHER ONE WA
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22296519 ↗MalfunctionJun 19, 2025Degraded; Degraded
AS REPORTED, WHEN INSERTING A 4F 90 CM TEMPO PIGTAIL (PIG) CATHETER INTO AN UNKNOWN SHEATH, THE PART ATTACHED TO THE HUB CAME LOOSE AND WAS BROKEN. THE TERM ¿LOOSE AND BROKEN¿ REFERRED TO A SPLIT IN AN AREA OF THE DEVICE. ONLY ONE DEVICE WAS USED IN THE PATIENT. THIS DEVICE DID NOT HAVE ANY PARTICLES NOTED. ALL THE ONES FROM THE SAME BATCH WERE COLLECTED, AND BASED ON THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED, TWO (2) STERILE DEVICES HAD PARTICLES INSIDE THE SEALED PACKAGING AND COULD NOT BE USED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE INVOLVED THE LEGS. THE TERM ¿LOOSE AND BROKEN¿ REFERRED TO A SPLIT IN AN AREA OF THE DEVICE. THE DAMAGE OBSERVED WAS DESCRIBED AS "FRAYED, SPLIT, OR TORN" AND WAS NOTICED DURING USE IN THE PATIENT. THE PRODUCT WAS STORED AND HANDLED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU), AND NO DAMAGE WAS NOTICED PRIOR TO OPENING THE PACKAGE. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE STERILE PACKAGING, WHICH WAS PREPPED PER THE IFU WITHOUT ANY ISSUES. ANOTHER TEMPO CATHETER WAS NOT USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE, SINCE TWO WERE FOUND TO CONTAIN PARTICLES INSIDE THE PACKAGING UPON INSPECTION; ONE OF THEM WAS SAVED, AND THE OTHER ONE WA
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22293744 ↗
Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- TrapEase Permanent Vena Cava Filter with the VisEase Angiographic Vessel Dilator 466P306AUCordis Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC6 deaths186 reports
- Dragonfly™ OPTIS™ C408646Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC4 deaths150 reports
- Dragonfly OpStar™ 1014651Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall87 reports
- LANGSTON IPN913559Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls14 reports
- Trevo 90238Stryker Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls5 reports
- Expo™ H749085263011Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls3 reports
- Expo™ H74908526501Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 report
- Expo™ H74908526031Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page