TEMPO 451442V0Recalls & reported problems
Cordis Corporation · CATH TEMPO 4F C1 65CM · Class 2
All models of TEMPO (56)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10705032008020), received between Jun 29, 2023 and Jun 29, 2023 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Leak/Splash” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Leak/Splash1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 29, 2023Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash
AS REPORTED, A 4F 65CM TEMPO COBRA ¿ CHILD 1 (C1) DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER WAS DRAWING BACK AIR WHEN CONNECTED TO A MECHANICAL CONTRAST PUMP. AS A RESULT, A NEW 4F 65CM TEMPO COBRA C1 DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER WAS USED AS A REPLACEMENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED INJURY TO THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE WAS IN THE ILIAC ARTERY WHEN THE DRAW BACK WAS BEING PERFORMED AND THE TIP OF THE CATHETER WAS SITTING FREELY WITHIN THE VESSEL. THERE WERE NO SIGNS OF CALCIFICATION, STENOSIS, OR TORTUOSITY PRESENT IN THE TARGET VESSEL. A NON-CORDIS HIGH PRESSURE TUBING WAS USED. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY CONNECTING THE TUBING TO THE TEMPO CATHETER AND NO LEAKAGE WAS OBSERVED AT EITHER END OF THE HIGH-PRESSURE TUBING. THE MALFUNCTION OCCURRED PRIOR TO TAKING AN ANGIOGRAM WITH THE C1 CATHETER; HOWEVER, ONE ¿PIGTAIL RUN¿ WAS PERFORMED PRIOR TO THE USE OF THE C1 CATHETER. THE DEVICE WAS STORED AND PREPPED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU) AND THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY FLUSHING THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17228380 ↗
Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- TrapEase Permanent Vena Cava Filter with the VisEase Angiographic Vessel Dilator 466P306AUCordis Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC6 deaths186 reports
- Dragonfly™ OPTIS™ C408646Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC4 deaths150 reports
- Dragonfly OpStar™ 1014651Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall87 reports
- LANGSTON IPN913559Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls14 reports
- Trevo 90238Stryker Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls5 reports
- Expo™ H749085263011Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls3 reports
- Expo™ H74908526501Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 report
- Expo™ H74908526031Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page