Skip to content

TEMPO 451543V0Recalls & reported problems

Cordis Corporation · CATH TEMPO 5F C2 65CM · Class 2

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705032008679), received between Aug 9, 2019 and Nov 10, 2025 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 2 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Crack3
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component3
  • Material Frayed2
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn2
  • Degraded1
  • Difficult to Remove1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 10, 2025Degraded; Degraded

    AS REPORTED, THE BODY OF A 5F TEMPO ANGIOGRAPHIC CATHETERS WAS PEELING OFF, APPEARING AS THOUGH IT WAS DECOMPOSING. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT ADDITIONAL DEVICES FROM THE SAME LOTS AND SKUS EXHIBITED SIMILAR PEELING, WITH APPROXIMATELY NINETEEN DEVICES AFFECTED. IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE REMAINING DEVICES WERE STERILE AND EXHIBITED THE SAME FAILURE. DEVICES ARE STORED IN THE WAREHOUSE ALONG WITH OTHER MEDICAL DEVICES. OZONE IS NOT USED TO DISINFECT, AND IT IS NOT USED IN ANY AREAS SUCH AS PROCEDURE OR STORAGE ROOMS. FOUR IMAGES WERE PROVIDED, SHOWING BLUE FLAKES ON A BLOOD-SOAKED SURGICAL TOWEL, CRACKS ON THE CATHETER BODY AND STRAIN RELIEF, AND YELLOWISH DISCOLORATION TO THE HUB. THE DEVICES WILL BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23510622 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 5, 2024Material Frayed; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Frayed; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    AS REPORTED, BY THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT, A 5F 65CM TEMPO DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER WAS USED IN A PATIENT AND THE PRODUCT "BROKE". THE DAMAGE WAS DESCRIBED AS FRAYED, SPLIT TORN DURING USE IN THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE BROKE OFF AT THE BASE DURING ROTATION OF THE CATHETER AFTER A FEW ATTEMPTS, TRYING TO STEER THE CATHETER. ANOTHER PRODUCT WITH THE SAME LOT WAS TAKEN AND IT BROKE AGAIN. A THIRD PRODUCT WAS THEN TAKEN WHICH DID NOT BREAK. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED AS ILIAC- SIDE BRANCH, PROBING OF THE VESSEL OF THE LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA). THE PRODUCT WAS STORED AND HANDLED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THERE WAS NO DEVICE DAMAGE NOTICED PRIOR TO OPENING THE PACKAGE OR DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE STERILE PACKAGING. THERE WAS SEVERE LESION CALCIFICATION AND TORTUOSITY. THE DEVICES WERE DISCARDED AND WILL NOT BE RETURNED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19684981 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 5, 2024Material Frayed; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Frayed; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    AS REPORTED, BY THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT, A 5F 65CM TEMPO DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER WAS USED IN A PATIENT AND THE PRODUCT "BROKE". THE DAMAGE WAS DESCRIBED AS FRAYED, SPLIT TORN DURING USE IN THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE BROKE OFF AT THE BASE DURING ROTATION OF THE CATHETER AFTER A FEW ATTEMPTS, TRYING TO STEER THE CATHETER. ANOTHER PRODUCT WITH THE SAME LOT WAS TAKEN AND IT BROKE AGAIN. A THIRD PRODUCT WAS THEN TAKEN WHICH DID NOT BREAK. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED AS ILIAC- SIDE BRANCH, PROBING OF THE VESSEL OF THE LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA). THE PRODUCT WAS STORED AND HANDLED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THERE WAS NO DEVICE DAMAGE NOTICED PRIOR TO OPENING THE PACKAGE OR DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE STERILE PACKAGING. THERE WAS SEVERE LESION CALCIFICATION AND TORTUOSITY. THE DEVICES WERE DISCARDED AND WILL NOT BE RETURNED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19684967 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 2, 2021Crack; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Crack; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    AS REPORTED, THE 5F 65CM COBRA (C2) TEMPO DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER WAS INTACT WHEN TAKEN OUT OF THE PACKAGING, BUT IT KINKED (SNAPPED) DURING PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE CATHETER WAS STORED CORRECTLY AND HANDLED WITH CARE WHILST REMOVING FROM THE PACKAGING. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS A BRONCHIAL ARTERY EMBOLIZATION. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE STERILE PACKAGING. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY EXPERIENCED IN PREPPING THE DEVICE. THE PRODUCT, OR ANY OF THE OTHER DEVICES USED WITH IT, HAD NOT BEEN RESTERILIZED. A CONTRALATERAL APPROACH WAS NOT USED. THE TARGET SITE WAS THE BRONCHIAL ARTERIES. THE ACCESS SITE WAS A FEMORAL APPROACH. THE LESION WAS NOT CALCIFIED. THERE WAS NO VESSEL TORTUOSITY. THERE WAS NO STENOSIS. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED FOR A CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (TOTAL OCCLUSION >3 MONTHS). THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY ADVANCING THE DEVICE THROUGH THE INTRODUCER OR THE GUIDEWIRE. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY ADVANCING THE DEVICE TO THE TARGET LESION. THERE WERE NO OTHER DEVICES USED WITH THE PRODUCT. NO EXCESSIVE TORQUING WAS REQUIRED. THERE WAS NO UNUSUAL FORCE USED AT ANY TIME DURING THE PROCEDURE. ANOTHER PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12257799 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 27, 2021Crack; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Crack; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    AS REPORTED, TWO (2) 5F 65CM COBRA (C2) TEMPO DIAGNOSTIC CATHETERS WERE KINKED/CRACKED (SNAPPED) WHEN REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. BOTH CATHETERS WERE INTACT WHEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGING AND HANDED TO THE DOCTOR BUT WHEN REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT THEY CAME OUT SNAPPED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE DEVICES WERE STORED PER LABELLING AND OPENED IN STERILE FIELD. THE PRODUCT WAS STORED AND HANDLED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE STERILE PACKAGING. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER THE IFU. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY EXPERIENCED IN PREPPING THE DEVICE. THE PRODUCT, OR ANY OF THE OTHER DEVICES USED WITH IT, HAD NOT BEEN RESTERILIZED. A CONTRALATERAL APPROACH WAS NOT USED. THE TARGET SITE WAS THE COMMON ILIAC. THE ACCESS SITE WAS FEMORAL. THE LESION WAS NOT CALCIFIED. THERE WAS NO VESSEL TORTUOSITY. THE WAS NO STENOSIS. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED FOR A CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (TOTAL OCCLUSION >3 MONTHS). THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY ADVANCING THE DEVICE THROUGH THE INTRODUCER, OVER THE GUIDEWIRE, OR TO THE TARGET LESION. THE OTHER DEVICES USED WITH THE PRODUCT DID NOT KINK NOR BEND AT ANY TIME. THERE WAS NO UNUSUAL FORCE USED AT

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12230794 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 27, 2021Crack; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Crack; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    AS REPORTED, TWO (2) 5F 65CM COBRA (C2) TEMPO DIAGNOSTIC CATHETERS WERE KINKED/CRACKED (SNAPPED) WHEN REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. BOTH CATHETERS WERE INTACT WHEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGING AND HANDED TO THE DOCTOR BUT WHEN REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT THEY CAME OUT SNAPPED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE DEVICES WERE STORED PER LABELLING AND OPENED IN STERILE FIELD. THE PRODUCT WAS STORED AND HANDLED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE STERILE PACKAGING. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER THE IFU. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY EXPERIENCED IN PREPPING THE DEVICE. THE PRODUCT, OR ANY OF THE OTHER DEVICES USED WITH IT, HAD NOT BEEN RESTERILIZED. A CONTRALATERAL APPROACH WAS NOT USED. THE TARGET SITE WAS THE COMMON ILIAC. THE ACCESS SITE WAS FEMORAL. THE LESION WAS NOT CALCIFIED. THERE WAS NO VESSEL TORTUOSITY. THE WAS NO STENOSIS. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED FOR A CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (TOTAL OCCLUSION >3 MONTHS). THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY ADVANCING THE DEVICE THROUGH THE INTRODUCER, OVER THE GUIDEWIRE, OR TO THE TARGET LESION. THE OTHER DEVICES USED WITH THE PRODUCT DID NOT KINK NOR BEND AT ANY TIME. THERE WAS NO UNUSUAL FORCE USED AT

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12230754 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 9, 2019Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove

    AS REPORTED, A 5F C2 65CM TEMPO CATHETER COLLAPSED TWICE AND DID NOT RECOVER ITS ORIGINAL SHAPE WHICH HAS HINDERED THE REMOVAL OF THE CATHETER BY USING THE INTRODUCER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE PRODUCT WAS WITHDRAWN FROM THE PATIENT AND A PUNCTURE SITE HAS BEEN MADE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8879351 ↗

Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices

All CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.