Skip to content

SUPER TORQUE 533551Recalls & reported problems

Cordis Corporation · CATH F5.2+ JL3.5 100CM · Class 2

All models of SUPER TORQUE (11)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705032012669), received between Jan 7, 2022 and Aug 20, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Puncture/Hole” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Puncture/Hole2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
  • Leak/Splash1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 20, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    AS REPORTED, THE WHITE TIP OF A 5.2F JUDKINS LEFT 3.5 (JL3.5) SUPER TORQUE PLUS DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER BROKE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. PER PRELIMINARY IMAGE REVIEW, PICTURES OF THE DEVICE SHOW THAT THE HUB OF THE CATHETER WAS BROKEN INTO SEPARATE PIECES. THE DEVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22853866 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 11, 2022Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Material Puncture/Hole

    AS REPORTED, WHEN THE SUPER TORQUE CATHETER (CATH F5.2+ JL3.5 100CM) WAS BEING PREPARED BEFORE INSERTION, THE CUSTOMER NOTICED A HOLE IN THE BODY OF THE CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE DAMAGE WAS NOTED ON THE CATHETER (BODY/SHAFT AND DESCRIBED AS PUNCTURE/CUT. THE PRODUCT WAS STORED, HANDLED AND PREPPED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTICED TO THE DEVICE PRIOR TO OPENING THE PACKAGE. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE STERILE PACKAGING OR PREPPING THE DEVICE. NEITHER THE PRODUCT NOR ANY OF THE OTHER DEVICES USED WITH IT HAD BEEN RESTERILIZED. THE DEVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE RETURN FOR INVESTIGATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14670633 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 7, 2022Leak/Splash; Material Puncture/Hole; Leak/Splash; Material Puncture/Hole

    AS REPORTED, A 5F JUDKINS LEFT 3.5 100CM SUPER TORQUE PLUS DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER LEAKED EXTERNALLY INTO THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER UNKNOWN CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE EVENT DID NOT CAUSE A CLINICALLY RELEVANT INCREASE IN THE DURATION OF THE PROCEDURE. THE EVENT DID NOT CAUSE A CONDITION THAT REQUIRES HOSPITALIZATION OR SIGNIFICANT PROLONGATION OF EXISTING HOSPITALIZATION. THE INCIDENT EXTENDED THE PROCEDURE NO MORE THAN 15 MINUTES. THE PROCEDURE WAS A CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY. THE INTENDED VESSEL WAS THE MIDDLE ANTERIOR INTERVENTRICULAR ARTERY. THIS WAS NOT FOR A CTO. THE VESSEL DIAMETER WAS 3MM WITH NORMAL CORONARY FLOW BUT HAD A VERY TIGHT STENOSIS. THE PERCENTAGE OF STENOSIS WAS 70-90%. THERE WERE NO ANOMALIES NOTED WHEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE NOR DURING PREP. THE DEVICE WAS NOT INSERTED THROUGH A STOPCOCK INSTEAD OF A HEMOSTATIC VALVE. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE MET WHILE ADVANCING THE DEVICE. EXCESSIVE TORQUEING WAS NOT REQUIRED. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE MET WHILE ADVANCING THE DEVICE OVER THE GUIDEWIRE. THE DEVICE DID NOT KINK AT ANY PART. OTHER PROCEDURAL DETAILS WERE REQUESTED BUT ARE UNKNOWN, UNAVAILABLE, OR NOT APPLICABLE. THE D

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13190406 ↗

Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices

All CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page