SUPER TORQUE 533551Recalls & reported problems
Cordis Corporation · CATH F5.2+ JL3.5 100CM · Class 2
All models of SUPER TORQUE (11)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705032012669), received between Jan 7, 2022 and Aug 20, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Puncture/Hole” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Puncture/Hole2
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
- Leak/Splash1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 20, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
AS REPORTED, THE WHITE TIP OF A 5.2F JUDKINS LEFT 3.5 (JL3.5) SUPER TORQUE PLUS DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER BROKE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. PER PRELIMINARY IMAGE REVIEW, PICTURES OF THE DEVICE SHOW THAT THE HUB OF THE CATHETER WAS BROKEN INTO SEPARATE PIECES. THE DEVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22853866 ↗MalfunctionJun 11, 2022Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Material Puncture/Hole
AS REPORTED, WHEN THE SUPER TORQUE CATHETER (CATH F5.2+ JL3.5 100CM) WAS BEING PREPARED BEFORE INSERTION, THE CUSTOMER NOTICED A HOLE IN THE BODY OF THE CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE DAMAGE WAS NOTED ON THE CATHETER (BODY/SHAFT AND DESCRIBED AS PUNCTURE/CUT. THE PRODUCT WAS STORED, HANDLED AND PREPPED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTICED TO THE DEVICE PRIOR TO OPENING THE PACKAGE. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE STERILE PACKAGING OR PREPPING THE DEVICE. NEITHER THE PRODUCT NOR ANY OF THE OTHER DEVICES USED WITH IT HAD BEEN RESTERILIZED. THE DEVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE RETURN FOR INVESTIGATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14670633 ↗MalfunctionJan 7, 2022Leak/Splash; Material Puncture/Hole; Leak/Splash; Material Puncture/Hole
AS REPORTED, A 5F JUDKINS LEFT 3.5 100CM SUPER TORQUE PLUS DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER LEAKED EXTERNALLY INTO THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER UNKNOWN CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE EVENT DID NOT CAUSE A CLINICALLY RELEVANT INCREASE IN THE DURATION OF THE PROCEDURE. THE EVENT DID NOT CAUSE A CONDITION THAT REQUIRES HOSPITALIZATION OR SIGNIFICANT PROLONGATION OF EXISTING HOSPITALIZATION. THE INCIDENT EXTENDED THE PROCEDURE NO MORE THAN 15 MINUTES. THE PROCEDURE WAS A CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY. THE INTENDED VESSEL WAS THE MIDDLE ANTERIOR INTERVENTRICULAR ARTERY. THIS WAS NOT FOR A CTO. THE VESSEL DIAMETER WAS 3MM WITH NORMAL CORONARY FLOW BUT HAD A VERY TIGHT STENOSIS. THE PERCENTAGE OF STENOSIS WAS 70-90%. THERE WERE NO ANOMALIES NOTED WHEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE NOR DURING PREP. THE DEVICE WAS NOT INSERTED THROUGH A STOPCOCK INSTEAD OF A HEMOSTATIC VALVE. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE MET WHILE ADVANCING THE DEVICE. EXCESSIVE TORQUEING WAS NOT REQUIRED. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE MET WHILE ADVANCING THE DEVICE OVER THE GUIDEWIRE. THE DEVICE DID NOT KINK AT ANY PART. OTHER PROCEDURAL DETAILS WERE REQUESTED BUT ARE UNKNOWN, UNAVAILABLE, OR NOT APPLICABLE. THE D
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13190406 ↗
Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- TrapEase Permanent Vena Cava Filter with the VisEase Angiographic Vessel Dilator 466P306AUCordis Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC6 deaths186 reports
- Dragonfly™ OPTIS™ C408646Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC4 deaths150 reports
- Dragonfly OpStar™ 1014651Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall87 reports
- LANGSTON IPN913559Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls14 reports
- Trevo 90238Stryker Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls5 reports
- Expo™ H749085263011Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls3 reports
- Expo™ H74908526501Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 report
- Expo™ H74908526031Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page