TEMPO SRD5602Recalls & reported problems
Cordis Corporation · 5F TEMPO 0.038 100CM BL · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705032048644), received between Jun 27, 2022 and Jun 28, 2022 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Vascular Dissection4
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 28, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure
AS REPORTED, CARDIOLOGISTS REPORTED 4 (FOUR) DIFFERENT CASES OF AORTIC DISSECTIONS WHILE USING THE 5F TEMPO (5F TEMPO 0.038 100C BL) BRACHIAL LEFT CATHETER. THREE (3) DIFFERENT CARDIOLOGISTS FROM THE SAME HOSPITAL RECENTLY REPORTED THE SAME KIND OF COMPLICATION ALL WITH PRODUCT CODE SRD5602. THEY HAVE BEEN USING THIS PRODUCT FOR YEARS. THE INCIDENT WAS REPORTED AT THE DUTCH HEALTH CARE INSPECTORATE AND CARDIOLOGISTS ARE CALLING OTHER DOCTORS TO SEE IF THEY HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SAME KIND OF COMPLICATION WITH THIS CATHETER. THE DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. THIS CASE IS RELATED TO (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 14841079 ↗InjuryJun 27, 2022Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure
AS REPORTED, CARDIOLOGISTS REPORTED 4 (FOUR) DIFFERENT CASES OF AORTIC DISSECTIONS WHILE USING THE 5F TEMPO (5F TEMPO 0.038 100C BL) BRACHIAL LEFT CATHETER. THREE (3) DIFFERENT CARDIOLOGISTS FROM THE SAME HOSPITAL RECENTLY REPORTED THE SAME KIND OF COMPLICATION ALL WITH PRODUCT CODE SRD5602. THEY HAVE BEEN USING THIS PRODUCT FOR YEARS. THE INCIDENT WAS REPORTED AT THE DUTCH HEALTH CARE INSPECTORATE AND CARDIOLOGISTS ARE CALLING OTHER DOCTORS TO SEE IF THEY HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SAME KIND OF COMPLICATION WITH THIS CATHETER. THE DEVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE RETURN FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 14832164 ↗InjuryJun 27, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure
AS REPORTED, CARDIOLOGISTS REPORTED 4 (FOUR) DIFFERENT CASES OF AORTIC DISSECTION WHILE USING THE 5F TEMPO (5F TEMPO 0.038 100C BL) BRACHIAL LEFT CATHETER. THREE (3) DIFFERENT CARDIOLOGISTS FROM THE SAME HOSPITAL RECENTLY REPORTED THE SAME KIND OF COMPLICATION ALL WITH PRODUCT CODE SRD5602. THEY HAVE BEEN USING THIS PRODUCT FOR YEARS. THE INCIDENT WAS REPORTED AT THE DUTCH HEALTH CARE INSPECTORATE AND CARDIOLOGISTS ARE CALLING OTHER DOCTORS TO SEE IF THEY HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SAME KIND OF COMPLICATION WITH THIS CATHETER. THE DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. THIS CASE IS RELATED TO (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 14831088 ↗InjuryJun 27, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure
AS REPORTED, CARDIOLOGISTS REPORTED 4 (FOUR) DIFFERENT CASES OF AORTIC DISSECTION WHILE USING THE 5F TEMPO (5F TEMPO 0.038 100C BL) BRACHIAL LEFT CATHETER. THREE (3) DIFFERENT CARDIOLOGISTS FROM THE SAME HOSPITAL RECENTLY REPORTED THE SAME KIND OF COMPLICATION ALL WITH PRODUCT CODE SRD5602. THEY HAVE BEEN USING THIS PRODUCT FOR YEARS. THE INCIDENT WAS REPORTED AT THE (B)(6) HEALTH CARE INSPECTORATE AND CARDIOLOGISTS ARE CALLING OTHER DOCTORS TO SEE IF THEY HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SAME KIND OF COMPLICATION WITH THIS CATHETER. THE DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. THIS CASE IS RELATED TO (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 14830911 ↗
Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- TrapEase Permanent Vena Cava Filter with the VisEase Angiographic Vessel Dilator 466P306AUCordis Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC6 deaths186 reports
- Dragonfly™ OPTIS™ C408646Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC4 deaths150 reports
- Dragonfly OpStar™ 1014651Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall87 reports
- LANGSTON IPN913559Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls14 reports
- Trevo 90238Stryker Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls5 reports
- Expo™ H749085263011Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls3 reports
- Expo™ H74908526501Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 report
- Expo™ H74908526031Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page