Skip to content

TEMPO AQUA SRD6109Recalls & reported problems

Cordis Corporation · CATHETER 5F TEMPO AQUA 125CM · Class 2

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705032049795), received between Dec 27, 2024 and Jun 24, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 2 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Crack4
  • Degraded2
  • Leak/Splash2
  • Difficult to Remove1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 24, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove

    AS REPORTED, DURING AN INTERVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAM PERFORMED IN THE NORTH ZONE, IT WAS NOTED INTRAOPERATIVELY UNDER ANGIOGRAPHY THAT THE PROXIMAL END OF THE CATHETER WAS KINKED. WHEN THE PROXIMAL CATHETER WAS TURNED, THE DISTAL END COULD NOT BE TURNED WITH IT. THE KINKED CATHETER COULD NOT BE WITHDRAWN AT THAT TIME, AND ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO ROTATE THE CATHETER IN BOTH DIRECTIONS WHILE TRYING TO WITHDRAW THE KINKED CATHETER BY UNTWISTING IT USING A GUIDEWIRE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INJURY. THE HOSPITAL REPORTED THIS CASE AS A SERIOUS INJURY ADVERSE EVENT TO CHINA NMPA. THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22322273 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2025Crack; Crack

    AS REPORTED, THE HEAD OF THE 5F 125 CM SIDEWINDER II TEMPO AQUA CATHETER WAS FOUND TO BE BENT AND CRACKED, AND RINSING REVEALED LEAKAGE WHEN THE OPERATOR OPENED THE PACKAGE FOR CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY SUPER SELECTIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21547183 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 17, 2025Crack; Crack

    AS REPORTED, THE TIP OF 5F 125CM TEMPO AQUA CONTRAST CATHETER WAS FOUND TO BE CRACKED AT THE DISTAL END OF THE BODY/SHAFT WHEN OPENING THE PACKAGE. THE DEVICE CRACKED BUT DID NOT SEPARATE INTO TWO SEPARATE PIECES. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY CHANGING TO ANOTHER SIM2 CATHETER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED INJURY TO THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THE PACKAGING OF THE DEVICE, AND THE PRODUCT WAS STORED WITHOUT ANY DAMAGE IN THE LAB. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU), AND NO DIFFICULTY WAS EXPERIENCED DURING THE PREP. THE ACCESS SITE WAS THE RADIAL ARTERY, AND THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS FOR CAROTID ARTERY STENOSIS. THERE WAS NO VESSEL TORTUOSITY. THE DEVICE WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION AS MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS WERE MADE WITHOUT SUCCESS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21181091 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 27, 2024Crack; Degraded; Leak/Splash; Crack; Degraded; Leak/Splash

    AS REPORTED, THE OPERATOR PERFORMED CAROTID SUPER-SELECTION VIA THE RADIAL ARTERY, CHOOSING A 5FR TEMPO AQUA AND PREOPERATIVELY PREPARED TO FLUSH THE FIRST CATHETER. ITS RECURVE/BEND OCCURRED A JET OF WATER. THE FIRST DEVICE HAD A LEAK. THE SECOND 5F TEMPO AQUA CATHETER HAD AN OBVIOUS BREAK/LEAK AS WELL. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD CATHETER. THE DEVICES WERE NOT USED IN THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED INJURY. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO THE PACKAGING OF THE DEVICES. THE DEVICES WILL BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21025536 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 27, 2024Crack; Degraded; Leak/Splash; Crack; Degraded; Leak/Splash

    AS REPORTED, THE OPERATOR PERFORMED CAROTID SUPER-SELECTION VIA THE RADIAL ARTERY, CHOOSING A 5FR TEMPO AQUA AND PREOPERATIVELY PREPARED TO FLUSH THE FIRST CATHETER. ITS RECURVE/BEND OCCURRED A JET OF WATER. THE FIRST DEVICE HAD A LEAK. THE SECOND 5F TEMPO AQUA CATHETER HAD AN OBVIOUS BREAK/LEAK AS WELL. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD CATHETER. THE DEVICES WERE NOT USED IN THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED INJURY. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO THE PACKAGING OF THE DEVICES. THE DEVICES WILL BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21025486 ↗

Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices

All CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.