VIPER 186727770Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · VIPER SYSTEM FENESTRATED CORTICAL FIX POLYAXIAL SCREW 5.5 x 7 x 70mm · Class 2 · Implant
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10705034282725), received between Jun 11, 2019 and Jun 11, 2019 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
Patient problems
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 11, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2019, DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, THE CORTICAL FIX FENESTRATED SCREW MIS TI CFX FEN POLY 8X80 WAS BEING INSERTED INTO THE S2-ALAR POSITION AND BECAME TIGHT. AT THE POINT OF NO POSSIBLE FURTHER FORWARD MOMENTUM, THE DECISION WAS TAKEN TO REMOVE THE SCREW AND UTILIZE A SMALLER DIAMETER SCREW. THE SCREW CAME DETACHED FROM THE SCREW INSERTION INSTRUMENT (286725300) AS THE TORQUE REQUIRED WAS TOO LARGE. MANY ALTERNATIVE INSTRUMENTS WERE USED TO TRY AND REMOVE THE SCREW WITH COUNTERCLOCKWISE ROTATIONS HOWEVER THEY DIDN¿T WORK. DURING THIS SCREW REMOVAL ATTEMPT, A SCREW MIS TI CFX FEN POLY 7X70 PLACED INTRADISCALLY THOUGH S1-L5 WAS TO BE REVERSED SLIGHTLY IN ORDER TO GAIN FURTHER ROOM AND LEVERAGE ON MIS TI CFX FEN POLY 8X80. AT THE FIRST ATTEMPT TO REVERSE THIS SCREW, THE POLYAXIAL HEAD EVENTUALLY PULLED OVER THE HEAD OF THE SHANK OF THE SCREW WHICH HAD FATIGUED AND BROKEN. THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT PROUDNESS OF THE SCREW SHANK AND THEREFORE THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT TIME TAKEN TO TRY TO REMOVE THIS. EVENTUALLY, SEVERAL BURRS WERE USED TO ¿CUT THROUGH¿ THE SCREW AND GET IT FLUSH TO THE PATIENTS BONE WHERE IT WAS LEFT IN SITU. THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY ON AN UNKNO
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 8688834 ↗
Other bone cement, posterior screw augmentation devices
- VIPER 186727645Medos International Sàrl · bone cement, posterior screw augmentation3 deaths27 reports
- VIPER 186727745Medos International Sàrl · bone cement, posterior screw augmentation23 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199723645Medos International Sàrl · bone cement, posterior screw augmentation21 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199723745Medos International Sàrl · bone cement, posterior screw augmentation13 reports
- VIPER 186727640Medos International Sàrl · bone cement, posterior screw augmentation2 deaths11 reports
- VIPER 186727850Medos International Sàrl · bone cement, posterior screw augmentation9 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199723435Medos International Sàrl · bone cement, posterior screw augmentation6 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199723535Medos International Sàrl · bone cement, posterior screw augmentation4 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.