SYMPHONY 1020-00-000SRecalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · SYMPHONY OCT SYSTEM SET SCREW · Class 2 · Implant
All models of SYMPHONY (113)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 10
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034526799), received between Jul 5, 2022 and Aug 18, 2026 — classified as 10 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (7 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break7
- Migration3
- Device Slipped1
Patient problems
- Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture7
- Failure of Implant2
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 18, 2026Migration
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 50308237 ↗InjuryJan 17, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ALMOST ALL INNER SCREWS FROM A SYMPHONY CONSTRUCTION DETACHED FROM THE HEAD OF THE SCREW. THE FIRST SURGERY WAS ON (B)(6) 2024 AND IN POST OP EXAM IT WAS VERIFIED THAT THAT CONSTRUCTION FAILED WITH THE LOOSE LOCKING SCREWS. ALMOST ALL PEDICLE SCREWS REMAINED ON PLACE. NON UNION WAS ALSO NOTED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY, WHICH WENT WELL.
Patient problems: Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture
MAUDE report 21180760 ↗InjuryJan 17, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ALMOST ALL INNER SCREWS FROM A SYMPHONY CONSTRUCTION DETACHED FROM THE HEAD OF THE SCREW. THE FIRST SURGERY WAS ON (B)(6) 2024 AND IN POST OP EXAM IT WAS VERIFIED THAT THAT CONSTRUCTION FAILED WITH THE LOOSE LOCKING SCREWS. ALMOST ALL PEDICLE SCREWS REMAINED ON PLACE. NON UNION WAS ALSO NOTED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY, WHICH WENT WELL.
Patient problems: Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture
MAUDE report 21180698 ↗InjuryJan 17, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ALMOST ALL INNER SCREWS FROM A SYMPHONY CONSTRUCTION DETACHED FROM THE HEAD OF THE SCREW. THE FIRST SURGERY WAS ON (B)(6) 2024 AND IN POST OP EXAM IT WAS VERIFIED THAT CONSTRUCTION FAILED WITH THE LOOSE LOCKING SCREWS. ALMOST ALL PEDICLE SCREWS REMAINED ON PLACE. NON-UNION WAS ALSO NOTED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY, WHICH WENT WELL.
Patient problems: Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture
MAUDE report 21180685 ↗InjuryJan 17, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ALMOST ALL INNER SCREWS FROM A SYMPHONY CONSTRUCTION DETACHED FROM THE HEAD OF THE SCREW. THE FIRST SURGERY WAS ON (B)(6) 2024 AND IN POST OP EXAM IT WAS VERIFIED THAT CONSTRUCTION FAILED WITH THE LOOSE LOCKING SCREWS. ALMOST ALL PEDICLE SCREWS REMAINED ON PLACE. NON UNION WAS ALSO NOTED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY, WHICH WENT WELL.
Patient problems: Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture
MAUDE report 21180670 ↗InjuryJan 17, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ALMOST ALL INNER SCREWS FROM A SYMPHONY CONSTRUCTION DETACHED FROM THE HEAD OF THE SCREW. THE FIRST SURGERY WAS ON (B)(6) 2024 AND IN POST OP EXAM IT WAS VERIFIED THAT CONSTRUCTION FAILED WITH THE LOOSE LOCKING SCREWS. ALMOST ALL PEDICLE SCREWS REMAINED ON PLACE. NON-UNION WAS ALSO NOTED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY, WHICH WENT WELL.
Patient problems: Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture
MAUDE report 21180608 ↗InjuryJan 17, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ALMOST ALL INNER SCREWS FROM A SYMPHONY CONSTRUCTION DETACHED FROM THE HEAD OF THE SCREW. THE FIRST SURGERY WAS ON (B)(6) 2024 AND IN POST OP EXAM IT WAS VERIFIED THAT THAT CONSTRUCTION FAILED WITH THE LOOSE LOCKING SCREWS. ALMOST ALL PEDICLE SCREWS REMAINED ON PLACE. NON-UNION WAS ALSO NOTED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY, WHICH WENT WELL.
Patient problems: Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture
MAUDE report 21180152 ↗InjuryJan 17, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ALMOST ALL INNER SCREWS FROM A SYMPHONY CONSTRUCTION DETACHED FROM THE HEAD OF THE SCREW. THE FIRST SURGERY WAS ON (B)(6) 2024 AND IN POST OP EXAM IT WAS VERIFIED THAT CONSTRUCTION FAILED WITH THE LOOSE LOCKING SCREWS. ALMOST ALL PEDICLE SCREWS REMAINED ON PLACE. NON UNION WAS ALSO NOTED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY, WHICH WENT WELL.
Patient problems: Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture
MAUDE report 21180076 ↗InjuryMar 27, 2023Migration; Migration
DEVICE REPORT FROM DEPUY SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN JAPAN AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS WAS AN UNKNOWN SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. IN THE SURGERY, T2/3 WAS FIXED WITH SYMPHONY PRODUCTS, T5-S2 WERE FIXED WITH EXPEDIUM VERSE PRODUCTS. L1-S2 WERE CONNECTED BY STRIKER¿S OPENDOMINO PRODUCTS. ONLY THE SET SCREWS ON THE LEFT SIDE OF T2/3 HAVE COME OFF THIS MONTH. ON (B)(6) 2023, SYMPHONY SCREWS IN T2/3 WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH EXPEDIUM VERSE PRODUCTS, AND THE AFFECTED AREA WERE RE-FIXED IN THE REVISION SURGERY. THE REVISION SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) SET SCREW. THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 2 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 16624395 ↗InjuryMar 27, 2023Migration; Migration
DEVICE REPORT FROM DEPUY SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN JAPAN AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS WAS AN UNKNOWN SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. IN THE SURGERY, T2/3 WAS FIXED WITH SYMPHONY PRODUCTS, T5-S2 WERE FIXED WITH EXPEDIUM VERSE PRODUCTS. L1-S2 WERE CONNECTED BY STRIKER¿S OPENDOMINO PRODUCTS. ONLY THE SET SCREWS ON THE LEFT SIDE OF T2/3 HAVE COME OFF THIS MONTH. ON (B)(6) 2023, SYMPHONY SCREWS IN T2/3 WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH EXPEDIUM VERSE PRODUCTS, AND THE AFFECTED AREA WERE RE-FIXED IN THE REVISION SURGERY. THE REVISION SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) SET SCREW. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 2 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 16624337 ↗InjuryJul 5, 2022Device Slipped; Device Slipped
DEVICE REPORT FROM JAPAN REPORTS AN EVENT AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A PRIMARY POSTERIOR FUSION (C2-T1) FOR TREATING ATHETOID CEREBRAL PALSY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT SURGICAL DELAY. APPROXIMATELY 8 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL PROCEDURE, THE SCREWHEAD ON THE SETSCREW (T1 LEFT) HAD COME OFF A ROD. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE SURGEON MADE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: THE PATIENT¿S DAILY ACTIVITIES CHARACTERIZED BY THE CEREBRAL PALSY MIGHT HAVE TRIGGERED THE SCREWHEAD TO COME OFF A ROD. AS MENTIONED ON THE ABOVE, ONLY THE SCREWHEAD HAD COME OFF. ON THE OTHER HAND, HE USED A TORQUE DRIVER TO CHECK IF THE SETSCREW ITSELF HAD BEEN TIGHTENED IN THE LESION, AND IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE SETSCREW HAD BEEN SECURED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 14916600 ↗
Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices
- EXPEDIUM 179702000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL439 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721001Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL227 reports
- XIA 3 48230000Stryker Corporation · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL193 reports
- VIPER 186715000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL1 death167 reports
- NA 04.614.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL80 reports
- EXPEDIUM VIPER 196789480Depuy Spine, LLC · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- NA 04.615.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- Arsenal Deformity Spinal Fixation System 47127Alphatec Spine, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL66 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page